Sūduva vs Banga: match statistics
Sūduva vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sūduva play Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 13 June 2026 at 13:15. Venue: Marijampoles sporto centro stadione. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Sūduva: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Banga: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sūduva scores 1.55 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. Banga scores 1.41 and concedes 0.68. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sūduva 55%, Banga 32%. Over 2.5: Sūduva 50%, Banga 36%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Sūduva has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.37. Sūduva: 12.2 shots per match, Banga: 11.9.
Match halves
Sūduva: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.91. Banga: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.82.
Goals by minute
Sūduva: 76-90+ (11 goals). Banga: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
5 H2H matches: 4-0-1. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 40%.
Match description
Sūduva is the favorite in this match: undefeated at home (0% defeats) with a 63% home win rate, averaging 1.75 goals scored and 0.5 conceded per home game. Banga averages only 1.0 goals per away match, records 50% of away games without scoring and has a low shot conversion rate of 8%, despite generating 1.59 xG on the road, indicating finishing issues. In the last 5 matches Sūduva scored 9 goals and averaged 1.8 points per game, while Banga scored 4 goals and averaged 1.2 points per game, demonstrating better form and efficiency from the hosts. Additionally, Sūduva keeps clean sheets in 63% of home games and has a lower share of matches without a goal (25% vs 50% for Banga), and their home shot conversion is 15% versus 8% for the visitors, so the hosts convert chances more effectively. Based on this, I project a home win probability of 62%, a draw 22% and an away win 16%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sūduva | Banga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sūduva is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Sūduva · 2.4 pts / match - Banga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sūduva is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.55 goals / match - Sūduva · 1.41 goals / match - Banga
Banga is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.77 goals / match - Sūduva · 0.68 goals / match - Banga
Sūduva scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).
Banga scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Sūduva
Over / Under — Banga
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sūduva is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Sūduva · 1.32 pts / match - Banga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Banga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sūduva
Banga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Sūduva | Liga | Banga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.32 | 2.62 | ▼ 2.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 49% | ▼ 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 32% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 69% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Sūduva 4 - 0 - 1 Banga. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sūduva vs Banga?
The A Lyga match finished Sūduva 0:0 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sūduva and Banga?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Sūduva won 4, Banga won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sūduva vs Banga?
Sūduva score 1.55 goals per game on average and Banga 1.41. The A Lyga average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Sūduva's matches and 32% of Banga's.
What form are Sūduva and Banga in?
Over the last 5 games Sūduva have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Banga 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sūduva vs Banga?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.