Lithuania - A LygaMarijampoles sporto centro stadioneData current as of 06 September 2026

Sūduva vs Banga: match statistics

Sūduva crest
Sūduva
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Banga crest
Banga

Sūduva vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sūduva played Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 13 June 2026. Venue: Marijampoles sporto centro stadione. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Sūduva: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Banga: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sūduva scores 1.44 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Banga scores 1.38 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sūduva 50%, Banga 38%. Over 2.5: Sūduva 44%, Banga 38%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Sūduva has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.44. Sūduva: 12.4 shots per match, Banga: 12.4.

Match halves

Sūduva: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.88. Banga: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Sūduva: 76-90+ (8 goals). Banga: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-0-1. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sūduva is the favorite in this match: undefeated at home (0% defeats) with a 63% home win rate, averaging 1.75 goals scored and 0.5 conceded per home game. Banga averages only 1.0 goals per away match, records 50% of away games without scoring and has a low shot conversion rate of 8%, despite generating 1.59 xG on the road, indicating finishing issues. In the last 5 matches Sūduva scored 9 goals and averaged 1.8 points per game, while Banga scored 4 goals and averaged 1.2 points per game, demonstrating better form and efficiency from the hosts. Additionally, Sūduva keeps clean sheets in 63% of home games and has a lower share of matches without a goal (25% vs 50% for Banga), and their home shot conversion is 15% versus 8% for the visitors, so the hosts convert chances more effectively. Based on this, I project a home win probability of 62%, a draw 22% and an away win 16%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis shows conflicting signals: Sūduva at home has 63% BTTS in the season and 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches and scores on average 1.75 goals at the stadium (last 5: 1.8), suggesting the hosts regularly find the net. This is countered by Banga’s defensive consistency away — only 13% BTTS matches and 50% clean sheets on the road with an average of 0.5 goals conceded, which significantly reduces the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Offensively Banga generates 1.59 xG away and averages 5.13 shots on target, but a low shot conversion rate of 8% and a season goals average of 1.0 show these chances are often wasted. After weighing form and seasonal indicators I assess BTTS - Yes probability at about 40% and No at 60%, therefore I recommend backing No due to Banga’s high clean sheet rate (50%) and low away BTTS rate (13%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Combining seasonal averages (1.75 for Sūduva, 1.00 for Banga) and xG (1.30 for Sūduva, 1.59 for Banga) yields an averaged estimate of 1.47 goals for the home side and 1.23 for the visitors, totaling 2.70 goals. Sūduva at home have 75% of matches with over 1.5 goals, and in the last 5 matches they have averaged 1.8 goals (9 goals in 5), which supports a high probability of Over 1.5 (~75%). I assess Over 2.5 at around 51%: Sūduva record 63% of season matches above 2.5, Banga only 13%, and the league average is 2.56 goals, giving a moderate tilt toward Over 2.5. However, Banga keep 50% clean sheets and concede on average 0.5 goals per match, which reduces the chance of a very high-scoring affair (Over 3.5 ~29%). Therefore the best and strongest option from the data is Over 1.5 — the highest, well-documented probability supported by Sūduva’s offense and Banga’s moderate defense.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Based on half-time statistics, a draw at the break is the most likely: Sūduva had a draw at half-time in 38% of home matches season-to-date and in 80% of their last 5 games, while Banga led at the break in 0% of their last 5 matches and only 25% of away fixtures. However, Sūduva are more dangerous in the second half — they score on average 0.75 goals after the break and win 50% of second halves, while Banga concedes on average 0.25 goals after half-time, which gives the hosts an advantage late on. Additionally, Sūduva convert chances more efficiently (conversion 15% versus Banga’s 8%), and although Banga’s xG is 1.59 compared to Sūduva’s 1.3, the visitors’ low conversion rate reduces their real chances. Sūduva average 1.75 goals at home versus Banga’s 1.0 on the road and, despite the visitors conceding only 0.5 goals away, the hosts’ superior finishing increases the likelihood of a turnaround after a draw at half-time; therefore I pick X/1 with a 28% probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
SūduvaBanga
9Shots9
SūduvaBanga
3Shots on target3
SūduvaBanga
1.49xG1.27
SūduvaBanga
7Corners4
SūduvaBanga
99Dangerous attacks69
SūduvaBanga
10Fouls10
SūduvaBanga
1Cards0
SūduvaBanga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.44Goals scored / match1.38
SūduvaBanga
0.81Goals conceded / match0.81
SūduvaBanga
49%Average possession45%
SūduvaBanga
4.69Shots on target / match4.44
SūduvaBanga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.44Shots per match12.44
SūduvaBanga
4.69Shots on target4.44
SūduvaBanga
11.6%Shot conversion11.1%
SūduvaBanga
49%Possession45%
SūduvaBanga
1.46xG for1.44
SūduvaBanga
1.26xG against1.22
SūduvaBanga

Shooting quality

Sūduva: BalancedBanga: Balanced
SūduvaBanga
Accuracy (shots on target)38%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sūduva is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Sūduva · 1.6 pts / match - Banga

Sūduva
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W44% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-3
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Banga
WDWLD
Season result split
38% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-5
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sūduva scoring profile: strong

Sūduva scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

Banga scoring profile: mixed

Banga scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 matches).

23Goals scored (season)22
SūduvaBanga
13Goals conceded (season)13
SūduvaBanga
2.25Average goals in match2.19
SūduvaBanga
9Goals scored (last 5)8
SūduvaBanga
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
SūduvaBanga

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal63%
SūduvaBanga
38%2 goals44%
SūduvaBanga
19%3 goals13%
SūduvaBanga
6%4 goals13%
SūduvaBanga

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal69%
SūduvaBanga
25%2 goals13%
SūduvaBanga
0%3 goals0%
SūduvaBanga
0%4 goals0%
SūduvaBanga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
SūduvaBanga
13%BTTS in both halves0%
SūduvaBanga
31%Scored in both halves25%
SūduvaBanga

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
SūduvaBanga
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
SūduvaBanga
80%BTTS - last 540%
SūduvaBanga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
SūduvaBanga
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
SūduvaBanga
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
SūduvaBanga

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
SūduvaBanga
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
SūduvaBanga
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
SūduvaBanga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sūduva is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Sūduva · 1.38 pts / match - Banga

Sūduva - half-time state
31% leading56% draw13% trailing
Banga - half-time state
31% leading44% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.38
SūduvaBanga
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.69
SūduvaBanga
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
SūduvaBanga
0.81Average goals (1st half)1.06
SūduvaBanga
75%Clean sheet before half-time69%
SūduvaBanga
56%No goal before half-time63%
SūduvaBanga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.56
SūduvaBanga
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
SūduvaBanga
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
SūduvaBanga
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.13
SūduvaBanga
50%Clean sheet after half-time56%
SūduvaBanga
38%No goal after half-time50%
SūduvaBanga

Sūduva - second-half results

31% W63% R6% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Banga - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sūduva - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Banga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.0
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sūduva
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
6
4
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Banga
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
4
0
46-60
4
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sūduva

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Banga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

SūduvaLigaBanga
Average goals in match 2.252.65 2.19
Both teams scored 50%49% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%54% 38%
Clean sheets 44%31% 31%
Goal before half-time 56%71% 56%
Goal after half-time 69%77% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SūduvaSubstitutionOn: Lucky TomOff: Faustas Steponavičius
  2. SūduvaSubstitutionOn: Titas MilašiusOff: Aleksandar Živanović
  3. SūduvaSubstitutionOn: Rati GrigalavaOff: Henry Uzochokwu
  4. SūduvaYellow cardRati Grigalava

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Sūduva 4 - 0 - 1 Banga. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Banga
2 : 1
Sūduva
FK Banga Gargždai
0 : 1
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
2 : 1
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
0 : 1
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
1 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai

FAQ

What was the result of Sūduva vs Banga?

The A Lyga match finished Sūduva 0:0 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sūduva and Banga?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Sūduva won 4, Banga won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sūduva vs Banga?

Sūduva score 1.44 goals per game on average and Banga 1.38. The A Lyga average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sūduva's matches and 38% of Banga's.

What form are Sūduva and Banga in?

Over the last 5 games Sūduva have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Banga 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sūduva vs Banga?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.