Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: match statistics

Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II
0 : 0half-time 1:0
JFK Ventspils crest
JFK Ventspils

Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova II play JFK Ventspils in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Super Nova II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. JFK Ventspils: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova II scores 1.54 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. JFK Ventspils scores 1.23 and concedes 1.77. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova II 69%, JFK Ventspils 62%. Over 2.5: Super Nova II 46%, JFK Ventspils 62%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

JFK Ventspils has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.19. Super Nova II: 7.9 shots per match, JFK Ventspils: 6.3.

Match halves

Super Nova II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.85. JFK Ventspils: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Super Nova II: 16-30 (4 goals). JFK Ventspils: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Super Nova II have a 1-1-0 (3:2) record this season and in their last 5 matches recorded 1 win and 1 draw, averaging 2.0 points per game; at home they score 2.0 and concede 1.0 on average, registering 5 shots (2 on target) with a conversion rate of 40% and xG for 0.84 versus xG against 1.62. JFK Ventspils have a 0-2-1 (5:6) record and in their last 5 matches 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats, averaging 1.0 point per game; away they score 3.0 and concede 3.0 on average, registering 13 shots (7 on target) with xG for 1.96 and xG against 1.77. The hosts’ main advantage is a lower goals conceded rate at home — 1.0 versus the visitors’ 3.0 conceded away — and a superior points per game average (2.0 vs 1.0). The visitors, however, create substantially more chances (13 shots and 7 on target versus 5/2 for the hosts) and have a higher xG, which increases their scoring probability; additionally, the share of matches without a goal is 0% for both teams, so both sides typically score. Considering the hosts’ defensive resilience and their high efficiency from fewer chances, I give Super Nova II a narrow edge and tip them to win (50% probability for the home side, 30% for a draw, 20% for the visitors).

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
-1Shots-1
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
-1Shots on target-1
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0xG0
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
-1Corners-1
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0Dangerous attacks0
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
-1Fouls-1
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
-1Cards-1
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
1.54Goals scored / match1.23
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
1.46Goals conceded / match1.77
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
43%Average possession41%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
3.62Shots on target / match2.92
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.92Shots per match6.31
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
3.62Shots on target2.92
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
19.4%Shot conversion19.5%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
43%Possession41%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
1.19xG for1.27
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
1.74xG against1.49
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

Shooting quality

Super Nova II: Counter-attackingJFK Ventspils: Counter-attacking
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
Accuracy (shots on target)46%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JFK Ventspils is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Super Nova II · 1.4 pts / match - JFK Ventspils

Super Nova II
DLWDL
Season result split
38% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-4
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 2.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
JFK Ventspils
WLDWL
Season result split
15% W31% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-7
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Super Nova II is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1.54 goals / match - Super Nova II · 1.23 goals / match - JFK Ventspils

Super Nova II is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - Super Nova II · 1.77 goals / match - JFK Ventspils

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

JFK Ventspils scoring profile: very strong

JFK Ventspils scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

20Goals scored (season)16
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
19Goals conceded (season)23
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
3Average goals in match3
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal69%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
46%2 goals38%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
23%3 goals15%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0%4 goals0%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal85%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
23%2 goals54%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
15%3 goals31%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
8%4 goals8%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time15%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
23%Scored in both halves23%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
80%BTTS - last 560%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / match - Super Nova II · 1.23 pts / match - JFK Ventspils

Super Nova II - half-time state
38% leading46% draw15% trailing
JFK Ventspils - half-time state
31% leading31% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1.23
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.31
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
77%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
46%No goal before half-time54%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.69
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
31%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils
46%No goal after half-time54%
Super Nova IIJFK Ventspils

Super Nova II - second-half results

23% W54% R23% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JFK Ventspils - second-half results

23% W31% R46% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
JFK Ventspils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+4-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

JFK Ventspils
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

JFK Ventspils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Super Nova IILigaJFK Ventspils
Average goals in match 3.003.43 3.00
Both teams scored 69%60% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%68% 62%
Clean sheets 23%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 62%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?

The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 0:0 JFK Ventspils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?

Super Nova II score 1.54 goals per game on average and JFK Ventspils 1.23. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Super Nova II's matches and 62% of JFK Ventspils's.

What form are Super Nova II and JFK Ventspils in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and JFK Ventspils 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.