Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: match statistics
Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Super Nova II played JFK Ventspils in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Super Nova II: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. JFK Ventspils: 0-2-1, 0.67 points/match.
Goal statistics
Super Nova II scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. JFK Ventspils scores 1.67 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Super Nova II 100%, JFK Ventspils 67%. Over 2.5: Super Nova II 50%, JFK Ventspils 67%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 76%.
xG, shots and style
JFK Ventspils has higher xG: 1.46 vs 0.95. Super Nova II: 6.5 shots per match, JFK Ventspils: 8.3.
Match halves
Super Nova II: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. JFK Ventspils: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Super Nova II: 16-30 (1 goals). JFK Ventspils: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.59 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 76%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Super Nova II have a 1-1-0 (3:2) record this season and in their last 5 matches recorded 1 win and 1 draw, averaging 2.0 points per game; at home they score 2.0 and concede 1.0 on average, registering 5 shots (2 on target) with a conversion rate of 40% and xG for 0.84 versus xG against 1.62. JFK Ventspils have a 0-2-1 (5:6) record and in their last 5 matches 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats, averaging 1.0 point per game; away they score 3.0 and concede 3.0 on average, registering 13 shots (7 on target) with xG for 1.96 and xG against 1.77. The hosts’ main advantage is a lower goals conceded rate at home — 1.0 versus the visitors’ 3.0 conceded away — and a superior points per game average (2.0 vs 1.0). The visitors, however, create substantially more chances (13 shots and 7 on target versus 5/2 for the hosts) and have a higher xG, which increases their scoring probability; additionally, the share of matches without a goal is 0% for both teams, so both sides typically score. Considering the hosts’ defensive resilience and their high efficiency from fewer chances, I give Super Nova II a narrow edge and tip them to win (50% probability for the home side, 30% for a draw, 20% for the visitors).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics strongly favor BTTS: JFK Ventspils has a seasonal rate of matches with both teams scoring at 100% versus Super Nova II's 50%, while league-wide BTTS occurs in 64% of matches. Both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, meaning neither Super Nova II nor JFK have kept a match without conceding (0.0% vs 0.0%). xG analysis shows the away side creates 1.96 xG per match versus the home 1.21 xG, and xG against is 1.77 for JFK and 1.31 for Super Nova II, indicating both sides both score and are exposed to conceding. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Super Nova II has BTTS 100% with average goals for and against 1.5 and 1.0, while JFK has BTTS 60% with averages 1.6 scored and 1.8 conceded; the away advantage in shots and shots on target (13 vs 6 and 7 vs 3) increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. On this basis I assess BTTS as clearly more probable and recommend a "yes" bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect about 1.49 goals for Super Nova II and 1.63 for JFK Ventspils, totaling 3.12 goals. JFK Ventspils scores on average 3.0 goals per match, records 7.0 shots on target and a 23% conversion rate, and 100% of their season’s matches finished Over 2.5 and Over 3.5 goals. Super Nova II averages 1.0 goals scored and concedes 1.5, with their matches exceeding 2.5 in 50% of cases, so combining both profiles increases the likelihood of a high-scoring game. Additionally the league averages 3.64 goals per match and 71% of fixtures >2.5, therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 2.5 and that is the side I recommend.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data clearly indicate an away advantage at half-time: the away side led at the break in 100% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 100.0), while the home side was never leading at half-time (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 0.0). Offensively, the away team averages 3.0 goals per match versus 1.0 for the home team (seasonScoredAVG_away = 3.0 vs seasonScoredAVG_home = 1.0), and their xG is 1.96 compared to the home side’s 1.21, confirming a qualitative offensive edge. Shot statistics show 13.0 attempts and 7.0 on target for the away team versus 6.0/3.0 for the home team (shotsAVG_away = 13.0, shotsOnTargetAVG_away = 7.0 vs shotsAVG_home = 6.0, shotsOnTargetAVG_home = 3.0), indicating greater goal threat from the visitors. The home team concedes an average of 1.5 goals before half-time (concededAVGHT_home = 1.5), while the away team has 100% clean sheets at half-time (seasonCSPercentageHT_away = 100.0); therefore the most likely scenario is the away team leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova II | JFK Ventspils | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.75 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Super Nova II is 199% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Super Nova II · 0.67 pts / match - JFK Ventspils
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JFK Ventspils is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Super Nova II · 1.67 goals / match - JFK Ventspils
Super Nova II is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Super Nova II · 2 goals / match - JFK Ventspils
Super Nova II scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
JFK Ventspils scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Super Nova II
Over / Under - JFK Ventspils
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Super Nova II is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Super Nova II · 1 pts / match - JFK Ventspils
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
JFK Ventspils - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Super Nova II
JFK Ventspils
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova II | Liga | JFK Ventspils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 3.59 | • 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 76% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 18% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?
The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 0:0 JFK Ventspils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?
Super Nova II score 1.50 goals per game on average and JFK Ventspils 1.67. The 1. Liga average is 3.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 76% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Super Nova II's matches and 67% of JFK Ventspils's.
What form are Super Nova II and JFK Ventspils in?
Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and JFK Ventspils 0-2-1 (0.67 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.