Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Super Nova crest
Super Nova
1 : 1half-time 0:1
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
125%(3.17)
X30%(3.25)
245%(2.05)

FS Jelgava exhibits a clearly superior form compared to Super Nova, which is corroborated by the points per game average over the last five fixtures (1.4 vs 1.0). The visitors remain undefeated this season with one win and zero losses, whereas the hosts have already suffered one defeat without registering a win. Super Nova sits much lower in the standings (8th place) compared to FS Jelgava (4th place), reflecting the quality gap between the two sides. The visitors' recent form (ddddw) indicates stability and a win in their latest match, while Super Nova concludes their streak with results of ddlwl, highlighting inconsistency. Given the advantage in overall goal difference (7:6 for the visitors vs 7:7 for the hosts) and better point-scoring efficiency, FS Jelgava has a realistic chance of an away win, although a draw cannot be ruled out given the tendency of both teams to share points.

Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova played FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 15 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Super Nova: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. FS Jelgava: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova 100%, FS Jelgava 100%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 100%, FS Jelgava 100%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

FS Jelgava has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.25. Super Nova: 8.0 shots per match, FS Jelgava: 10.0.

Match halves

Super Nova: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. FS Jelgava: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Super Nova: 76-90+ (1 goals). FS Jelgava: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FS Jelgava exhibits a clearly superior form compared to Super Nova, which is corroborated by the points per game average over the last five fixtures (1.4 vs 1.0). The visitors remain undefeated this season with one win and zero losses, whereas the hosts have already suffered one defeat without registering a win. Super Nova sits much lower in the standings (8th place) compared to FS Jelgava (4th place), reflecting the quality gap between the two sides. The visitors' recent form (ddddw) indicates stability and a win in their latest match, while Super Nova concludes their streak with results of ddlwl, highlighting inconsistency. Given the advantage in overall goal difference (7:6 for the visitors vs 7:7 for the hosts) and better point-scoring efficiency, FS Jelgava has a realistic chance of an away win, although a draw cannot be ruled out given the tendency of both teams to share points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Super NovaFS Jelgava
14Shots15
Super NovaFS Jelgava
5Shots on target4
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.65xG1.8
Super NovaFS Jelgava
6Corners8
Super NovaFS Jelgava
58Dangerous attacks79
Super NovaFS Jelgava
12Fouls19
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0Cards2
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match2
Super NovaFS Jelgava
2Goals conceded / match1
Super NovaFS Jelgava
41%Average possession48%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
4Shots on target / match5
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match10
Super NovaFS Jelgava
4Shots on target5
Super NovaFS Jelgava
12.5%Shot conversion20%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
41%Possession48%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.25xG for1.42
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.76xG against1.3
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Super Nova: Counter-attackingFS Jelgava: Efficient finishing
Super NovaFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)50%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Super Nova
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
FS Jelgava
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FS Jelgava is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Super Nova · 2 goals / match - FS Jelgava

FS Jelgava is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Super Nova · 1 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: very strong

FS Jelgava scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

1Goals scored (season)2
Super NovaFS Jelgava
2Goals conceded (season)1
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3Average goals in match3
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1Goals scored (last 5)2
Super NovaFS Jelgava
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
Super NovaFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%2 goals100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%3 goals0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%4 goals0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
100%2 goals0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%3 goals0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%4 goals0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%Scored in both halves100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per match (1st half)1
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0Goals scored (1st half)1
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1Goals conceded (1st half)1
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1Average goals (1st half)2
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%Clean sheet before half-time0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
100%No goal before half-time0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)3
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Super NovaFS Jelgava
2Average goals (2nd half)1
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%No goal after half-time0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Super Nova - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.001.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Super NovaLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals in match 3.002.63 3.00
Both teams scored 100%50% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%50% 100%
Clean sheets 0%25% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%75% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%88% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FS JelgavaGoalGļebs Kačanovs
  2. FS JelgavaYellow cardMaksims Semeško
  3. Super NovaGoalRikuto IidaAssist: Facundo García
  4. FS JelgavaYellow cardAlans Kangars
  5. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Kristers SkadmanisOff: Amadou Samaté
  6. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Roberts MeļķisOff: Artūrs Janovskis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Super Nova 0 - 2 - 2 FS Jelgava. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
1 : 0
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
0 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 1
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 1:1 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and FS Jelgava?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 0, FS Jelgava won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

Super Nova score 1.00 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 2.00. The Virsliga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Super Nova's matches and 100% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Super Nova and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and FS Jelgava 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.