Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 22 July 2026

Super Nova vs Riga: match statistics

Super Nova crest
Super Nova
1 : 4half-time 1:3
Riga crest
Riga

Super Nova vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova play Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 14 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova scores 1.09 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Riga scores 2.96 and concedes 0.87. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova 61%, Riga 57%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 57%, Riga 83%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.19. Super Nova: 9.0 shots per match, Riga: 17.1.

Match halves

Super Nova: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.52. Riga: half-time lead 70%, second-half goals 1.43.

Goals by minute

Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 0-0-5. Average goals 4.20, BTTS 40%.

Match description

I predict an away win (Riga): their offensive superiority is substantial — Riga have scored 18 goals this season and 18 in the last 5 matches, translating to an average of 3.67 goals per away game, while Super Nova have 7 goals this season and average 1.00 goal per home match. Quality of chances favors the visitors: Riga’s average xG on the road is 1.86 versus Super Nova’s 1.65 xG at home, and the visitors’ shot conversion rate is 23% compared to the hosts’ 7%. Riga average 6.33 shots on target and 15.67 attempts away versus Super Nova’s 5 on target and 14 attempts at home, and additionally Riga register 64% possession versus the hosts’ 48%, indicating game control and more opportunities. Defensively both teams concede around 1 goal per game (Super Nova 1.00 at home, Riga 1.00 away), but Super Nova have 0% clean sheets and 0% home wins in their home stats, while Riga have 33% clean sheets and 67% away wins, which favors the visitors. Considering the visitors’ 3.67 goals per away game, 23% conversion and 64% possession versus the hosts’ 1.00 goals and 7% conversion, I assess the probabilities as 65% for Riga, 20% for a draw and 15% for Super Nova.

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

30Possession (%)70
Super NovaRiga
7Shots16
Super NovaRiga
3Shots on target6
Super NovaRiga
0.87xG1.91
Super NovaRiga
3Corners9
Super NovaRiga
29Dangerous attacks67
Super NovaRiga
15Fouls16
Super NovaRiga
1Cards0
Super NovaRiga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.09Goals scored / match2.96
Super NovaRiga
1.52Goals conceded / match0.87
Super NovaRiga
45%Average possession63%
Super NovaRiga
3.61Shots on target / match6.43
Super NovaRiga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.04Shots per match17.13
Super NovaRiga
3.61Shots on target6.43
Super NovaRiga
12%Shot conversion17.3%
Super NovaRiga
45%Possession63%
Super NovaRiga
1.19xG for2.03
Super NovaRiga
1.67xG against0.94
Super NovaRiga

Shooting quality

Super Nova: Counter-attackingRiga: Dominant
Super NovaRiga
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Super Nova · 2.6 pts / match - Riga

Super Nova
LLWLW
Season result split
35% W13% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-12
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Riga
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
78% W17% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-4-1
2.52 pts / match · goal difference +48
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 2.07Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 172% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Super Nova · 2.96 goals / match - Riga

Riga is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Super Nova · 0.87 goals / match - Riga

Super Nova scoring profile: strong

Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

25Goals scored (season)68
Super NovaRiga
35Goals conceded (season)20
Super NovaRiga
2.61Average goals in match3.83
Super NovaRiga
6Goals scored (last 5)12
Super NovaRiga
10Goals conceded (last 5)1
Super NovaRiga

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal96%
Super NovaRiga
26%2 goals87%
Super NovaRiga
4%3 goals65%
Super NovaRiga
0%4 goals30%
Super NovaRiga

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal57%
Super NovaRiga
48%2 goals22%
Super NovaRiga
13%3 goals9%
Super NovaRiga
9%4 goals0%
Super NovaRiga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time26%
Super NovaRiga
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Super NovaRiga
9%Scored in both halves61%
Super NovaRiga

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Super NovaRiga
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS26%
Super NovaRiga
60%BTTS - last 520%
Super NovaRiga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
Super NovaRiga
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time70%
Super NovaRiga
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time35%
Super NovaRiga

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Super NovaRiga
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
Super NovaRiga
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Super NovaRiga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 113% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / match - Super Nova · 2.22 pts / match - Riga

Super Nova - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing
Riga - half-time state
70% leading13% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)2.22
Super NovaRiga
0.57Goals scored (1st half)1.52
Super NovaRiga
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
Super NovaRiga
1.39Average goals (1st half)2
Super NovaRiga
52%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Super NovaRiga
57%No goal before half-time22%
Super NovaRiga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)2.22
Super NovaRiga
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)1.43
Super NovaRiga
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
Super NovaRiga
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Super NovaRiga
48%Clean sheet after half-time70%
Super NovaRiga
57%No goal after half-time22%
Super NovaRiga

Super Nova - second-half results

35% W17% R48% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding206%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga - second-half results

65% W26% R9% P
51
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+24
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
4
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Riga
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
12
3
16-30
16
4
31-45
9
4
46-60
8
3
61-75
16
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.93
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
224%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Super NovaLigaRiga
Average goals in match 2.612.98 3.83
Both teams scored 61%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%55% 83%
Clean sheets 22%24% 43%
Goal before half-time 61%75% 91%
Goal after half-time 87%84% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Super Nova 0 - 0 - 5 Riga. Average goals 4.20, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Riga
3 : 0
Super Nova
SK Super Nova
2 : 6
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 0
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 5
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 0
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova vs Riga?

The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 1:4 Riga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and Riga?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 0, Riga won 5 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs Riga?

Super Nova score 1.09 goals per game on average and Riga 2.96. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Super Nova's matches and 57% of Riga's.

What form are Super Nova and Riga in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Riga 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs Riga?

The statistical background for Super Nova vs Riga — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.