Suwon vs Seongnam: match statistics
Suwon vs Seongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Suwon played Seongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Suwon Civil Stadium Auxiliary. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Suwon: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Seongnam: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Suwon scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Seongnam scores 1.08 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Suwon 92%, Seongnam 67%. Over 2.5: Suwon 83%, Seongnam 42%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Seongnam has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.34. Suwon: 10.8 shots per match, Seongnam: 10.8.
Match halves
Suwon: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 1.00. Seongnam: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Suwon: 76-90+ (7 goals). Seongnam: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (Suwon). Suwon has scored 24 goals this season versus Seongnam’s 13 and has doubled Seongnam’s goals in the last 5 matches (10 vs 5). At home Suwon averages 2.2 goals per game with an xG of 1.46 and 12 shots, while Seongnam away averages 1.6 goals, xG 1.35 and 10.8 shots, indicating higher attacking efficiency for the hosts. Defensively Suwon concedes 1.2 goals at home versus Seongnam’s 1.4 conceded away; the hosts are unbeaten at home (0% losses) and have a 60% home win rate. Seongnam posts higher away possession (53% vs 45%), but both teams average the same shots on target (4), and Suwon’s shot conversion is higher (18% vs 15%), which favors Suwon. Considering the goal differential (24 vs 13), better points average in the last 5 matches (1.6 for Suwon vs 1.2 for Seongnam) and the unbeaten home record, I estimate Suwon’s win probability at ~60%, draw 25% and Seongnam win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes. Seongnam has a season-long BTTS rate of 100%, and Suwon has 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches while Seongnam has 80% in the same sample, producing a very strong signal for both teams to score. Goal stats show Seongnam averages 1.6 scored and 1.4 conceded per match, while Suwon seasonally scores 0.71 and concedes 0.86; additionally Suwon in the last 5 matches averages 2.0 scored and 1.4 conceded, so both sides have been finding the net recently. xG confirms chance creation: Suwon xG for 1.52 versus Seongnam xG against 1.45, and Seongnam xG for 1.35 versus Suwon xG against 1.13, meaning both teams generate ~1.1–1.5 xG per match. Moreover, Seongnam has zero clean sheets this season (0%), the league BTTS is 62%; shots on target are 4.0 for Seongnam vs 3.29 for Suwon, and shot conversion 15% vs 7% also supports goals. Given the strong historical BTTS indicators (100%/100%/80%) and the numbers above, I assess BTTS - Yes probability at 82% versus 18% No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based projection yields total expected goals of 2.73: Suwon expected 1.49 goals (attacking xG 1.52 vs opponent xG conceded 1.45), Seongnam 1.24 goals (attacking xG 1.35 vs xG conceded to Suwon 1.13). A Poisson distribution with λ=2.73 gives roughly a 76% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 51% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and around 29% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seongnam shows high efficiency: 4.0 shots on target per match and a 15% conversion rate, plus a season rate of matches over 1.5 goals at 100%, which increases the risk of them contributing goals. Suwon, despite a low actual goals average of 0.71, has xG 1.52 and 3.29 shots on target, indicating they create chances but do not always convert — this presents potential for that inefficiency to be broken. Therefore the strongest signal is to back Over 1.5 (line 1.5) with an implied probability of about 76% based on xG and the goal distribution.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The first-half model shows expected goals to half-time of 0.43 for Suwon and 0.80 for Seongnam; a simple Poisson model yields about a 41% chance of the visitors leading at the break, 40% for a half-time draw, and 19% for the hosts leading. Over the full match Seongnam scores on average 1.6 goals versus Suwon’s 0.71 and wins 40% of fixtures in the season, while Suwon wins only 14%; additionally the finishing rate is 15% for the visitors and 7% for the hosts, which increases the visitors’ chance of victory. Considering xG (1.35 for the visitors versus 1.52 for the hosts) and the higher conversion, I estimate that if the visitors lead at the break they will hold the win in about 55% of cases, making the 2/2 scenario the strongest signal (~23% total probability). However the form over the last 5 matches favors Suwon in the first half (Suwon led at half-time in 60% of the last 5 and averaged 1.0 half-time goals), hence there remain significant probabilities for a half-time draw followed by a visitors’ win (X/2 ≈18%) and for a full-time draw (≈14%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Suwon | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Suwon is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Suwon · 1.2 pts / match - Seongnam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Suwon is 85% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Suwon · 1.08 goals / match - Seongnam
Seongnam is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Suwon · 1.08 goals / match - Seongnam
Suwon scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
Seongnam scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Suwon keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Suwon
Over / Under - Seongnam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Suwon is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.83 pts / match - Suwon · 1.5 pts / match - Seongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Suwon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Suwon
Seongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Suwon | Liga | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.50 | 2.75 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 92% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 56% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 75% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Suwon vs Seongnam?
The K League 2 match finished Suwon 0:0 Seongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Suwon vs Seongnam?
Suwon score 2.00 goals per game on average and Seongnam 1.08. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 92% of Suwon's matches and 67% of Seongnam's.
What form are Suwon and Seongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Suwon have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Seongnam 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Suwon vs Seongnam?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Suwon vs Seongnam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


