China - China League OneData current as of 13 September 2026

Suzhou Dongwu vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: match statistics

Suzhou Dongwu vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Suzhou Dongwu played Heilongjiang Lava Spring in China League One (China). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Suzhou Dongwu: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Suzhou Dongwu scores 0.80 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Suzhou Dongwu 40%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 100%. Over 2.5: Suzhou Dongwu 40%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.05. Suzhou Dongwu: 7.4 shots per match, Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 9.2.

Match halves

Suzhou Dongwu: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Suzhou Dongwu: 46-60 (2 goals). Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.22 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Heilongjiang Lava Spring are slight favorites in this matchup: the visitors average 1.8 points over the last five matches versus Suzhou’s 1.2 and are unbeaten in those five (2 wins, 3 draws), while Suzhou’s form is 2 wins and 3 losses. Offensively the visitors’ edge is clear — 1.5 goals per away game versus 1.0 goals for the hosts in home matches, with average shots 8 vs 6, shots on target 5 vs 1.5 and conversion 19% vs 17%. xG, however, paints an even picture: average xG for the visitors is 1.08 versus 1.07 for the hosts, whereas the hosts have a higher xG against (1.96 vs 1.52), indicating Suzhou concedes more valuable chances. Suzhou defends relatively well at home — conceding 1.0 goals per match on average and keeping 50% clean sheets in home fixtures, while simultaneously failing to have any matches without scoring at home (0% matches without a goal), which may limit the visitors’ dominance. Based on this I tip the visitors to win, estimating probabilities: away win 45%, draw 30%, home win 25%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have BTTS at 100% this season (Suzhou Dongwu 100% and Heilongjiang 100%), and clean sheets at 0% for both, strongly supporting Goal/Goal. Average goals scored and conceded are 1.33 and 1.0 for Suzhou, and 1.5 and 1.0 for Heilongjiang, yielding a combined expected total of 2.83 goals per match versus the league average of 2.26. xG indicates both teams create chances (xG 1.38 for Suzhou vs 1.08 for Heilongjiang) while being vulnerable defensively (xG against 1.23 vs 1.52), and average shots on target are 5.0 per team. In the last 5 matches Heilongjiang had BTTS 100% compared to Suzhou's 40%, suggesting better recent form for the visitors, but the season-long metrics (100% BTTS and 0% clean sheets) remain dominant. I recommend a BTTS - Yes bet with probability 85% and No 15%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have 100.0% of their season matches over 1.5 goals (seasonOver15Percentage_home=100.0%, away=100.0%), which is the strongest signal for Over 1.5. Based on xG: hosts have xG_for 1.38 versus opponents’ xG_against 1.52, yielding an expected ~1.45 goals for Suzhou; visitors have xG_for 1.08 and hosts’ xG_against 1.23, yielding an expected ~1.16 for Heilongjiang, totaling ≈2.61 goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.61 gives about a 73% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 48% for three or more (Over 2.5), so Over 1.5 is more reliable than Over 2.5. Additionally, both teams have BTTS 100% and average 5 shots on target with conversion rates of 13% (hosts) vs 19% (visitors), which increases the probability of goals from both sides.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Both teams have 100% BTTS this season (seasonBTTSPercentage_home = 100% and seasonBTTSPercentage_away = 100%), so I expect goals before the final whistle. The away side are in better form: seasonally they average 1.5 goals versus the home 1.33, have higher points per game (2.0 vs 1.67) and a higher win rate (50% vs 33%). The second half favors the visitors – their average in second halves is 2.5 goals compared to 1.33 for the hosts, and the visitors have scored over 0.5 goals in the second half in 100% of matches; additionally the away team have scored twice in the 76–90 minute period (value 2.0). Although the hosts have a higher xG (1.38 vs 1.08) and more shots (10 vs 8), the visitors are more efficient (shot conversion 19% vs 13%) and convert chances more often late in games, therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at the break and an away win at full-time (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8Shots7
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
3Shots on target4
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.27xG1.01
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
6Corners3
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
78Dangerous attacks40
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
17Fouls16
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1Cards4
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.8Goals scored / match1.4
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1Goals conceded / match1
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
42%Average possession53%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.4Shots on target / match5
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.4Shots per match9.2
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.4Shots on target5
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
10.8%Shot conversion15.2%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
42%Possession53%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.05xG for1.26
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.5xG against1.34
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Shooting quality

Suzhou Dongwu: BalancedHeilongjiang Lava Spring: Efficient finishing
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Accuracy (shots on target)32%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu · 1.8 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Suzhou Dongwu
LWLLW
Season result split
40% W0% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
WDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W60% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu · 1.4 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Suzhou Dongwu scoring profile: very strong

Suzhou Dongwu scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scoring profile: very strong

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Suzhou Dongwu keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

4Goals scored (season)7
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
5Goals conceded (season)5
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.8Average goals in match2.4
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal100%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
20%2 goals40%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%3 goals0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%4 goals0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
20%2 goals0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%3 goals0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%4 goals0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

100%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 5 matches
44%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
20%Scored in both halves20%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Suzhou Dongwu is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu · 1 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Suzhou Dongwu - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.2
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.6Average goals (1st half)0.6
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
80%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
60%No goal before half-time80%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

After half-time (2nd half)

0.6Points per match (2nd half)2.2
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
20%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring
60%No goal after half-time0%
Suzhou DongwuHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Suzhou Dongwu - second-half results

0% W60% D40% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results

60% W40% D0% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Suzhou Dongwu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Suzhou Dongwu
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
3
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Suzhou Dongwu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Suzhou DongwuLigaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Average goals in match 1.802.22 2.40
Both teams scored 40%44% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%49% 40%
Clean sheets 20%33% 0%
Goal before half-time 60%66% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.22
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardDaciel Elis Santos
  2. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardJiaxuan Zhu
  3. Suzhou DongwuYellow cardMirzat Ali
  4. Heilongjiang Lava SpringGoalErikys da Silva FerreiraAssist: Bojian Fan
  5. Suzhou DongwuSubstitutionOn: Pan SongOff: Jiancong Wang
  6. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardErikys da Silva Ferreira
  7. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Nizamdin EpendiOff: Yucheng Hao
  8. Suzhou DongwuSubstitutionOn: Lingfeng ZhangOff: Rong Chen
  9. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardNizamdin Ependi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Suzhou Dongwu 1 - 0 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Suzhou Dongwu FC
1 : 0
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
3 : 1
Suzhou Dongwu FC

FAQ

What was the result of Suzhou Dongwu vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

The China League One match finished Suzhou Dongwu 0:1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Suzhou Dongwu and Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Suzhou Dongwu won 1, Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Suzhou Dongwu vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

Suzhou Dongwu score 0.80 goals per game on average and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.40. The China League One average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Suzhou Dongwu's matches and 100% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's.

What form are Suzhou Dongwu and Heilongjiang Lava Spring in?

Over the last 5 games Suzhou Dongwu have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Suzhou Dongwu vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

The statistical background for Suzhou Dongwu vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.