Suzhou Dongwu vs Nanjing City: match statistics
Suzhou Dongwu vs Nanjing City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Suzhou Dongwu played Nanjing City in China League One (China). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Suzhou Dongwu: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Nanjing City: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Suzhou Dongwu scores 1.00 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Nanjing City scores 0.90 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Suzhou Dongwu 52%, Nanjing City 57%. Over 2.5: Suzhou Dongwu 48%, Nanjing City 33%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Suzhou Dongwu has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.30. Suzhou Dongwu: 10.0 shots per match, Nanjing City: 11.8.
Match halves
Suzhou Dongwu: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.76. Nanjing City: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Suzhou Dongwu: 76-90+ (6 goals). Nanjing City: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Suzhou Dongwu are clearly showing better current form: they have collected 11 points from their last 5 matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws, while Nanjing City have managed just 3 points and remain without a victory. The hosts have scored 10 goals during this period, compared with only 4 for the visitors, confirming Suzhou’s edge in attacking efficiency. At home, Suzhou create chances worth an average of 1.57 xG per match, compared with Nanjing’s 1.19 xG away from home, and they also register more shots on target: 3.27 versus 2.50. Nanjing lose 60% of their away matches and keep a clean sheet in only 10% of them, meaning their defence should struggle to contain the in-form hosts. Suzhou are not entirely reliable defensively either, conceding an average of 1.27 goals at home, so a draw remains a realistic alternative, but the data point towards a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes is more likely, as the seasonal BTTS rates for both teams stand at 55% for Suzhou Dongwu and 60% for Nanjing City, slightly above the league average of 56%. The signal is even stronger across their last five matches: BTTS landed in 60% and 80% of their games, respectively. Suzhou have recently averaged 2.0 goals per match, while Nanjing, despite scoring just 0.8 goals, concede 1.6, with opponents recording a high xG of 1.83. The hosts have created an average of 1.72 xG in their last five appearances, while their defence has allowed opponents 1.47 xG, giving the visitors a realistic chance of scoring at least once. The main risk to this pick is Nanjing’s low conversion rate of 6% and the fact that they have failed to score in 30% of their matches; however, the weak defensive form of both sides outweighs these concerns and supports a scenario with goals at both ends.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Suzhou Dongwu have clearly better conditions to score: they generate an average of 1.40 xG, while Nanjing City allow opponents 1.48 xG, and the hosts have scored 10 goals in their last five matches. The visitors remain less effective, averaging just 0.70 goals per game this season and 2.50 shots on target, although Suzhou’s defence concedes an average of 1.09 goals. Despite the hosts’ better recent form, a high-scoring game has not been the norm throughout the season: 82% of Suzhou’s matches and 90% of Nanjing’s games finished with under 3.5 goals. In addition, neither team has recorded a match with over 4.5 goals this season, and neither has scored more than two goals in a single game. The projected total of 2.60 goals points to a realistic chance of a 2:0, 2:1 or 1:1 scoreline, making Under 3.5 the strongest pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time followed by a Suzhou Dongwu victory is the most likely outcome, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches and did not lead in any of them. During the same period, Nanjing City were trailing at half-time in 60% of their matches, while their average first-half scoring output was just 0.4 goals. After the break, Suzhou clearly increases the tempo: they scored an average of 1.8 goals in their last five appearances and won the second half in 80% of cases, whereas Nanjing managed just 0.4 goals during that period. The hosts’ advantage is also evident over the full match: they average 1.09 goals compared with their opponents’ 0.70, and their most recent run includes a 60% win rate without defeat, while the visitors have failed to win any of their last five matches. In addition, Nanjing concede an average of 1.40 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in only 10% of games, further supporting the scenario of a home-team turnaround after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Suzhou Dongwu | Nanjing City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Suzhou Dongwu is 267% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu · 0.6 pts / match - Nanjing City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Suzhou Dongwu is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu · 0.9 goals / match - Nanjing City
Nanjing City is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu · 1.24 goals / match - Nanjing City
Suzhou Dongwu scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Nanjing City keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
Nanjing City scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Suzhou Dongwu keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Suzhou Dongwu
Over / Under - Nanjing City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nanjing City is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu · 1.19 pts / match - Nanjing City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Suzhou Dongwu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nanjing City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Suzhou Dongwu
Nanjing City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Suzhou Dongwu | Liga | Nanjing City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.38 | 2.72 | ▼ 2.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 56% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 53% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 71% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Suzhou Dongwu 1 - 0 - 2 Nanjing City. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Suzhou Dongwu vs Nanjing City?
The China League One match finished Suzhou Dongwu 2:0 Nanjing City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Suzhou Dongwu and Nanjing City?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Suzhou Dongwu won 1, Nanjing City won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Suzhou Dongwu vs Nanjing City?
Suzhou Dongwu score 1.00 goals per game on average and Nanjing City 0.90. The China League One average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Suzhou Dongwu's matches and 57% of Nanjing City's.
What form are Suzhou Dongwu and Nanjing City in?
Over the last 5 games Suzhou Dongwu have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Nanjing City 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Suzhou Dongwu vs Nanjing City?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


