Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Stadion MiejskiData current as of 21 September 2026

Swit vs Lomza: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Swit vs Lomza: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Swit play Lomza in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match date is 25 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Miejski.

Current form

Swit: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Lomza: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Swit scores 1.33 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Lomza scores 1.11 and concedes 2.11. League average: 3.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Swit 56%, Lomza 67%. Over 2.5: Swit 67%, Lomza 44%. League level: BTTS 69%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Swit has higher xG: 2.08 vs 1.33. Swit: 12.7 shots per match, Lomza: 9.8.

Match halves

Swit: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.67. Lomza: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Swit: 16-30 (4 goals). Lomza: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.68 goals per match, BTTS 69%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match1.11
SwitLomza
1.11Goals conceded / match2.11
SwitLomza
40%Average possession42%
SwitLomza
4.33Shots on target / match3.22
SwitLomza

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.67Shots per match9.78
SwitLomza
4.33Shots on target3.22
SwitLomza
10.5%Shot conversion11.4%
SwitLomza
40%Possession42%
SwitLomza
2.08xG for1.33
SwitLomza
1.31xG against1.82
SwitLomza

Shooting quality

Swit: BalancedLomza: Balanced
SwitLomza
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Swit is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Swit · 0.4 pts / match - Lomza

Swit
DWLLW
Season result split
44% W22% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-3
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 at home
2-0-2
WLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Lomza
DLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-6
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Swit is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Swit · 1.11 goals / match - Lomza

Swit is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Swit · 2.11 goals / match - Lomza

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Lomza keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

Lomza scoring profile: strong

Lomza scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

12Goals scored (season)10
SwitLomza
10Goals conceded (season)19
SwitLomza
2.44Average goals in match3.22
SwitLomza
5Goals scored (last 5)5
SwitLomza
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
SwitLomza

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
SwitLomza
44%2 goals33%
SwitLomza
11%3 goals11%
SwitLomza
11%4 goals0%
SwitLomza

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal89%
SwitLomza
22%2 goals56%
SwitLomza
11%3 goals33%
SwitLomza
11%4 goals22%
SwitLomza

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
SwitLomza
0%BTTS in both halves11%
SwitLomza
11%Scored in both halves11%
SwitLomza

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
SwitLomza
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SwitLomza
60%BTTS - last 560%
SwitLomza

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
SwitLomza
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
SwitLomza
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
SwitLomza

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
SwitLomza
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
SwitLomza
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
SwitLomza

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lomza is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Swit · 1.44 pts / match - Lomza

Swit - half-time state
22% leading56% draw22% trailing
Lomza - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)1.44
SwitLomza
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.78
SwitLomza
0.22Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
SwitLomza
0.78Average goals (1st half)1.67
SwitLomza
78%Clean sheet before half-time44%
SwitLomza
78%No goal before half-time44%
SwitLomza

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.56
SwitLomza
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
SwitLomza
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.22
SwitLomza
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.56
SwitLomza
56%Clean sheet after half-time22%
SwitLomza
56%No goal after half-time78%
SwitLomza

Swit - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lomza - second-half results

11% W22% D67% L
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Lomza - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.20
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+3-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Swit
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Lomza
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
5
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Lomza

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

SwitLigaLomza
Average goals in match 2.443.68 3.22
Both teams scored 56%69% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%67% 44%
Clean sheets 33%17% 11%
Goal before half-time 44%73% 78%
Goal after half-time 67%83% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.68
Average goals per match
69%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
17%
Clean sheets
2.04
Home goals / match
1.64
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Swit 1 - 0 - 1 Lomza. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Swit
3 : 2
Lomza
Lomza
3 : 0
Swit

FAQ

When do Swit and Lomza play?

Swit face Lomza on 25 September 2026 in 3 Liga Group 1 at Stadion Miejski. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Swit and Lomza?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Swit won 1, Lomza won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Swit vs Lomza?

Swit score 1.33 goals per game on average and Lomza 1.11. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Swit's matches and 67% of Lomza's.

What form are Swit and Lomza in?

Over the last 5 games Swit have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lomza 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Swit vs Lomza?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Swit vs Lomza: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.