Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Swit vs Mławianka Mława: match statistics

Swit crest
Swit
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Mławianka Mława crest
Mławianka Mława
165%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Swit displays significantly better home form with 55% wins and an impressive +8 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.82 goals per match at home while conceding only 1.09, indicating a solid defense. On the other hand, Mławianka Mława has very poor away results - only 20% wins, as many as 50% losses, and a negative goal difference of -8. The visitors concede an average of 2.2 goals per match in away games, which, given their mere 1.4 goals scored, makes them highly susceptible to defeats. The recent form of both teams also favors the hosts - Swit has earned 1.2 points per match in the last five games, while Mławianka managed only 0.8 points. All key indicators, including xG (1.27 vs 1.18), shot accuracy, and clean sheet percentage, clearly favor the hosts in this clash.

Swit vs Mławianka Mława: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Swit play Mławianka Mława in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match date is 21 March 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Swit: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Mławianka Mława: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Swit scores 1.50 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. Mławianka Mława scores 1.62 and concedes 1.74. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Swit 59%, Mławianka Mława 71%. Over 2.5: Swit 65%, Mławianka Mława 71%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Mławianka Mława has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.29. Swit: 6.9 shots per match, Mławianka Mława: 9.9.

Match halves

Swit: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79. Mławianka Mława: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 1.15.

Goals by minute

Swit: 76-90+ (16 goals). Mławianka Mława: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Swit displays significantly better home form with 55% wins and an impressive +8 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.82 goals per match at home while conceding only 1.09, indicating a solid defense. On the other hand, Mławianka Mława has very poor away results - only 20% wins, as many as 50% losses, and a negative goal difference of -8. The visitors concede an average of 2.2 goals per match in away games, which, given their mere 1.4 goals scored, makes them highly susceptible to defeats. The recent form of both teams also favors the hosts - Swit has earned 1.2 points per match in the last five games, while Mławianka managed only 0.8 points. All key indicators, including xG (1.27 vs 1.18), shot accuracy, and clean sheet percentage, clearly favor the hosts in this clash.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
SwitMławianka Mława
6Shots11
SwitMławianka Mława
1Shots on target4
SwitMławianka Mława
0.91xG1.54
SwitMławianka Mława
3Corners8
SwitMławianka Mława
64Dangerous attacks78
SwitMławianka Mława
-1Fouls-1
SwitMławianka Mława
-1Cards-1
SwitMławianka Mława

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SwitMławianka Mława
1.5Goals scored / match1.62
SwitMławianka Mława
1.94Goals conceded / match1.74
SwitMławianka Mława
39%Average possession36%
SwitMławianka Mława
2.68Shots on target / match4.06
SwitMławianka Mława

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.88Shots per match9.91
SwitMławianka Mława
2.68Shots on target4.06
SwitMławianka Mława
21.8%Shot conversion16.3%
SwitMławianka Mława
39%Possession36%
SwitMławianka Mława
1.29xG for1.82
SwitMławianka Mława
1.64xG against1.35
SwitMławianka Mława

Shooting quality

Swit: Counter-attackingMławianka Mława: Counter-attacking
SwitMławianka Mława
Accuracy (shots on target)39%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Swit
WWLLL
Season result split
35% W15% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-17
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Mławianka Mława
LLWWL
Season result split
32% W21% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-16
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.04Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mławianka Mława is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Swit · 1.62 goals / match - Mławianka Mława

Mławianka Mława is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.94 goals / match - Swit · 1.74 goals / match - Mławianka Mława

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Mławianka Mława keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 matches).

Mławianka Mława scoring profile: very strong

Mławianka Mława scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).

51Goals scored (season)55
SwitMławianka Mława
66Goals conceded (season)59
SwitMławianka Mława
3.44Average goals in match3.35
SwitMławianka Mława
9Goals scored (last 5)6
SwitMławianka Mława
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
SwitMławianka Mława

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal82%
SwitMławianka Mława
41%2 goals53%
SwitMławianka Mława
24%3 goals21%
SwitMławianka Mława
6%4 goals6%
SwitMławianka Mława

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal85%
SwitMławianka Mława
53%2 goals56%
SwitMławianka Mława
35%3 goals21%
SwitMławianka Mława
15%4 goals6%
SwitMławianka Mława

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

71%
Mławianka Mława - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.24 of 34 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time26%
SwitMławianka Mława
9%BTTS in both halves18%
SwitMławianka Mława
24%Scored in both halves26%
SwitMławianka Mława

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
SwitMławianka Mława
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
SwitMławianka Mława
60%BTTS - last 540%
SwitMławianka Mława

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
SwitMławianka Mława
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
SwitMławianka Mława
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
SwitMławianka Mława

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
SwitMławianka Mława
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
SwitMławianka Mława
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time41%
SwitMławianka Mława

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Swit is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Swit · 0.94 pts / match - Mławianka Mława

Swit - half-time state
26% leading38% draw35% trailing
Mławianka Mława - half-time state
15% leading50% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)0.94
SwitMławianka Mława
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.44
SwitMławianka Mława
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
SwitMławianka Mława
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.32
SwitMławianka Mława
44%Clean sheet before half-time38%
SwitMławianka Mława
56%No goal before half-time65%
SwitMławianka Mława

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.76
SwitMławianka Mława
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)1.15
SwitMławianka Mława
0.97Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
SwitMławianka Mława
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.94
SwitMławianka Mława
41%Clean sheet after half-time44%
SwitMławianka Mława
47%No goal after half-time29%
SwitMławianka Mława

Swit - second-half results

35% W24% R41% P
40
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mławianka Mława - second-half results

50% W26% R24% P
32
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
60
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding213%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Mławianka Mława - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Swit
ScoredConceded
9
8
0-15
7
10
16-30
8
15
31-45
8
11
46-60
3
10
61-75
16
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Mławianka Mława
ScoredConceded
3
11
0-15
7
12
16-30
6
9
31-45
7
5
46-60
14
8
61-75
18
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+106%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Mławianka Mława

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

SwitLigaMławianka Mława
Average goals in match 3.443.33 3.35
Both teams scored 59%62% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%66% 71%
Clean sheets 21%20% 15%
Goal before half-time 76%74% 71%
Goal after half-time 82%83% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Swit 1 - 0 - 0 Mławianka Mława. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Mławianka Mława
3 : 4
Swit

FAQ

What was the result of Swit vs Mławianka Mława?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Swit 1:1 Mławianka Mława. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Swit vs Mławianka Mława?

Swit score 1.50 goals per game on average and Mławianka Mława 1.62. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Swit's matches and 71% of Mławianka Mława's.

What form are Swit and Mławianka Mława in?

Over the last 5 games Swit have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Mławianka Mława 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Swit vs Mławianka Mława?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Swit vs Mławianka Mława: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.