Szeged 2011 vs Honvéd W: match statistics
Szeged 2011 vs Honvéd W: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Szeged 2011 played Honvéd W in NB II (Hungary). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Szeged 2011: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Honvéd W: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Szeged 2011 scores 0.96 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. Honvéd W scores 1.67 and concedes 0.78. League average: 2.51 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Szeged 2011 37%, Honvéd W 48%. Over 2.5: Szeged 2011 37%, Honvéd W 52%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Honvéd W has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.46. Szeged 2011: 11.3 shots per match, Honvéd W: 15.0.
Match halves
Szeged 2011: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.59. Honvéd W: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Szeged 2011: 46-60 (9 goals). Honvéd W: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Honvéd is the clear favorite: they have 17 wins this season versus Szeged’s 8 and sit 2nd while Szeged 2011 are 12th. The visitors have scored 45 goals this season and average 1.31 goals away, while the hosts have 26 goals and average 1.15 goals per home match. Honvéd registers more shots (14.23 per match) and more shots on target (4.54) than Szeged (12.23 and 3.15), which translates into a higher volume of scoring opportunities. Defensively the visitors are better: Szeged concedes 1.38 goals at home on average and has conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 avg), whereas Honvéd concedes 0.69 goals away and 6 goals in the last 5 (1.2 avg). Despite similar attacking xG (1.66 Szeged vs 1.68 Honvéd), the lower xG against for the visitors (1.01 vs 1.37) and a lower share of matches without a goal for Honvéd (23% vs 31%) incline the pick towards an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes: both teams are expected to score. Szeged posts a seasonal BTTS of 57% vs Honvéd 38%, with the league average at 47%, slightly favoring a Goal/Goal scenario. Szeged averages 2.0 goals, xG 1.99 and 6.71 shots on target, while Honvéd records 1.31 goals, xG 1.68 and 4.54 shots on target — both sides create scoring chances; Szeged also shows higher shot conversion 13% vs 9%. Although Szeged has underperformed in the last 5 matches with 0.6 goals scored and 2.0 conceded (recent BTTS 20%), Honvéd’s last 5 show BTTS 60% with 1.0 scored and 1.2 conceded, indicating defensive vulnerability. Considering Szeged’s superior xG (1.99 vs 1.68), advantage in shots on target and moderate clean sheet rates of 36% and 38%, I assess BTTS probability at ~62% and tip Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals were calculated based on xG: Szeged’s attacking xG is 1.99 and Honvéd’s conceded xG is 1.01, yielding 1.50 expected goals for the home side; similarly Honvéd’s attacking xG 1.68 and Szeged’s conceded xG 1.18 give 1.43 for the visitors, totaling 2.93. A Poisson model for a total of 2.93 indicates roughly a 79% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 56% for Over 2.5 goals and around 34% for Over 3.5 goals; these figures are consistent with seasonal indicators (Szeged has 71% of matches over 1.5, Honvéd 62%, league average 2.51 goals per game). The home side generates more high-quality chances (on average 6.71 shots on target and a conversion rate of 13%), while Honvéd records 4.54 shots on target and a 9% conversion, which increases the likelihood of home goals. In the last 5 matches Szeged has averaged 0.6 goals for and 2.0 against, while Honvéd has averaged 1.0 for and 1.2 against, which further raises the risk of goals due to weaker defensive form of the hosts. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (over) with a forecast around 79%, Over 2.5 is moderate (56%), and Over 3.5 does not offer a clear edge (34%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw: Szeged drew at the break in 57% of matches and Honvéd in 62% of their games, yielding about a 60% chance of a draw after 45 minutes. After 90 minutes I assign higher chances to the home side, who average 2.00 goals per match versus 1.31 for the visitors and have higher xG (1.99 vs 1.68) as well as a higher average points per match this season (2.14 vs 1.92), which favors a turnaround in the second half. Additionally, Szeged register more shots on target (6.71 vs 4.54) and have a better conversion rate (13% vs 9%), increasing the likelihood that they will score the decisive goal after the break. However, in the last 5 matches the hosts led at the break in 0% of cases while the visitors did so in 20%, and the average points at half-time in that period are 0.4 for Szeged versus 1.4 for Honvéd, so I give moderate priority to the X/1 scenario. In my model this translates to the highest single probability for X/1 (24%), clear support for 1/1 (18%) and the remaining distribution of outcomes consistent with the figures cited.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Szeged 2011 | Honvéd W | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Honvéd W is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.4 pts / match - Honvéd W
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Honvéd W is 74% better for: goals scored per match.
0.96 goals / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.67 goals / match - Honvéd W
Honvéd W is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.22 goals / match - Szeged 2011 · 0.78 goals / match - Honvéd W
Szeged 2011 scores in 59% of matches (16 of 27 matches), while Honvéd W keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 matches).
Honvéd W scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Szeged 2011
Over / Under - Honvéd W
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Honvéd W is 91% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.7 pts / match - Honvéd W
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Szeged 2011 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Honvéd W - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Szeged 2011
Honvéd W
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Szeged 2011 | Liga | Honvéd W | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.19 | 2.51 | • 2.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 47% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 44% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 30% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 69% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 80% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Szeged 2011 0 - 1 - 0 Honvéd W. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Szeged 2011 vs Honvéd W?
The NB II match finished Szeged 2011 0:0 Honvéd W. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Szeged 2011 vs Honvéd W?
Szeged 2011 score 0.96 goals per game on average and Honvéd W 1.67. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Szeged 2011's matches and 48% of Honvéd W's.
What form are Szeged 2011 and Honvéd W in?
Over the last 5 games Szeged 2011 have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Honvéd W 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Szeged 2011 vs Honvéd W?
The statistical background for Szeged 2011 vs Honvéd W — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


