Hungary - NB IIData current as of 23 July 2026

Szeged 2011 vs Tiszakécske: match statistics

Szeged 2011 crest
Szeged 2011
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Tiszakécske crest
Tiszakécske
155%(1.85)
X28%(3.30)
217%(3.95)

Szeged 2011 displays significantly better home form with 56% wins at home and an impressive goal difference (+5). The hosts have won 6 of 9 home matches, conceding an average of only 0.89 goals per game and maintaining a clean sheet in 44% of fixtures. Tiszakécske has poor results away with only 22% wins, conceding an average of 1.56 goals and recording a negative goal difference (-4). The form of the last five matches also favors the hosts, although Szeged is going through a rougher patch. The statistical advantage of the hosts in home matches, higher xG (1.72 vs 1.51), and Tiszakécske's weakness on the road point to a victory for Szeged 2011, although a draw is also a realistic scenario due to the recent form of both teams.

Szeged 2011 vs Tiszakécske: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Szeged 2011 play Tiszakécske in NB II (Hungary). The match date is 22 February 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Szeged 2011: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Tiszakécske: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Szeged 2011 scores 0.97 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Tiszakécske scores 1.23 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Szeged 2011 33%, Tiszakécske 63%. Over 2.5: Szeged 2011 37%, Tiszakécske 47%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Tiszakécske has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.46. Szeged 2011: 10.9 shots per match, Tiszakécske: 10.2.

Match halves

Szeged 2011: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Tiszakécske: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

Szeged 2011: 46-60 (10 goals). Tiszakécske: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Szeged 2011 displays significantly better home form with 56% wins at home and an impressive goal difference (+5). The hosts have won 6 of 9 home matches, conceding an average of only 0.89 goals per game and maintaining a clean sheet in 44% of fixtures. Tiszakécske has poor results away with only 22% wins, conceding an average of 1.56 goals and recording a negative goal difference (-4). The form of the last five matches also favors the hosts, although Szeged is going through a rougher patch. The statistical advantage of the hosts in home matches, higher xG (1.72 vs 1.51), and Tiszakécske's weakness on the road point to a victory for Szeged 2011, although a draw is also a realistic scenario due to the recent form of both teams.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
13Shots14
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
2Shots on target4
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
1.59xG1.63
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
3Corners2
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
84Dangerous attacks62
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
18Fouls15
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
4Cards3
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
0.97Goals scored / match1.23
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
1.13Goals conceded / match1.47
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
50%Average possession45%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
3.07Shots on target / match3.23
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.87Shots per match10.2
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
3.07Shots on target3.23
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
8.9%Shot conversion12.1%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
50%Possession45%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
1.46xG for1.59
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
1.32xG against1.44
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

Shooting quality

Szeged 2011: BalancedTiszakécske: Counter-attacking
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
Accuracy (shots on target)28%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tiszakécske is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.2 pts / match - Tiszakécske

Szeged 2011
LLDWL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-6
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
Tiszakécske
LLWWL
Season result split
33% W30% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tiszakécske is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.23 goals / match - Tiszakécske

Szeged 2011 is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.47 goals / match - Tiszakécske

Szeged 2011 scoring profile: strong

Szeged 2011 scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Tiszakécske keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).

Tiszakécske scoring profile: very strong

Tiszakécske scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

29Goals scored (season)37
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
34Goals conceded (season)44
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
2.1Average goals in match2.7
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal83%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
23%2 goals27%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
10%3 goals10%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
7%4 goals3%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal77%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
27%2 goals37%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
13%3 goals17%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
7%4 goals10%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time13%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
10%Scored in both halves20%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
0%BTTS - last 560%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time97%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Szeged 2011 is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Szeged 2011 · 0.87 pts / match - Tiszakécske

Szeged 2011 - half-time state
20% leading37% draw43% trailing
Tiszakécske - half-time state
17% leading37% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)0.87
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.3
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
0.87Average goals (1st half)1.1
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
77%No goal before half-time73%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.83
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
60%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske
57%No goal after half-time23%
Szeged 2011Tiszakécske

Szeged 2011 - second-half results

33% W40% R27% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tiszakécske - second-half results

57% W13% R30% P
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Szeged 2011 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Tiszakécske - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Szeged 2011
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
10
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Tiszakécske
ScoredConceded
2
12
0-15
1
7
16-30
6
5
31-45
11
8
46-60
5
5
61-75
12
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+108%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Szeged 2011

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Tiszakécske

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

Szeged 2011LigaTiszakécske
Average goals in match 2.102.51 2.70
Both teams scored 33%48% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%45% 47%
Clean sheets 33%29% 23%
Goal before half-time 67%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 70%80% 97%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Szeged 2011 1 - 0 - 0 Tiszakécske. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Duna Aszfalt TVSE Tiszakécske
1 : 4
Szeged 2011 FC

FAQ

What was the result of Szeged 2011 vs Tiszakécske?

The NB II match finished Szeged 2011 1:1 Tiszakécske. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Szeged 2011 vs Tiszakécske?

Szeged 2011 score 0.97 goals per game on average and Tiszakécske 1.23. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Szeged 2011's matches and 63% of Tiszakécske's.

What form are Szeged 2011 and Tiszakécske in?

Over the last 5 games Szeged 2011 have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Tiszakécske 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Szeged 2011 vs Tiszakécske?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Szeged 2011 vs Tiszakécske: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.