Szeged 2011 vs Videoton: match statistics
Szeged 2011 vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Szeged 2011 played Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Szeged 2011: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Videoton: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Szeged 2011 scores 1.04 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Videoton scores 1.28 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Szeged 2011 40%, Videoton 48%. Over 2.5: Szeged 2011 36%, Videoton 32%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Szeged 2011 has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.37. Szeged 2011: 11.5 shots per match, Videoton: 9.9.
Match halves
Szeged 2011: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.64. Videoton: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Szeged 2011: 46-60 (9 goals). Videoton: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB II: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (Videoton). Videoton this season has 9 wins, 9 draws and 7 losses with 32 goals scored, while Szeged 2011 has 8 wins, 8 draws, 9 losses and 26 goals; Videoton sits 6th in the table, Szeged 10th. In their last five matches Videoton have scored 7, conceded 3 and remain unbeaten (2 wins, 3 draws) averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Szeged in the same period scored 5, conceded 7 and have a 2-1-2 record averaging 1.4 points per game. Statistically Szeged at home generates higher expected goals (xG 1.68) and more possession (53%), but actually scores only 1.25 goals per home match and has 25% of home games without scoring; Videoton away have xG 1.44, score 1.33 goals, average 3.8 shots on target and have a lower share of goalless matches (17%). Considering the visitors’ better form and efficiency over the last five matches (7–3 in goals, 1.8 pts per game) and the small seasonal offensive differentials, I favor Videoton with approximate probabilities: 42% win, 30% draw and 28% home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal stats paint a mixed picture: Szeged has only 31% of matches with both teams scoring and keeps a clean sheet in 54% of games with an average of 0.62 goals conceded per match, while Videoton records 67% BTTS matches and averages 1.33 goals scored and 1.42 conceded per game. In the last 5 fixtures Szeged averaged 1.0 goals scored and 1.4 conceded per match, whereas Videoton averaged 1.4 scored and 0.6 conceded, which increases the likelihood of both teams getting on the scoresheet. Additionally, xG favors the visitors — Videoton has xG for 1.44 versus Szeged xG against 1.08 — and the visitors average 12.2 shots per match with 11% conversion compared to the hosts’ 10.83 shots and 8% conversion. Szeged’s seasonal defensive edge (0.62 conceded and 54% clean sheets) is notable, but Videoton’s high season BTTS rate (67% vs Szeged 31%) and the visitors’ recent offensive form are the stronger signal. Therefore I assign 62% to BTTS - Yes and 38% to No, recommending the 'Yes' selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect Szeged to generate about 1.43 expected goals (xG) and Videoton about 1.12, totaling 2.55 expected goals. Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: Szeged 62% at home and Videoton 83% away, averaging 72%, which increases the probability of at least two goals. Looking at xG: Szeged’s attacking xG is 1.33 and Videoton’s xG against is 1.73, translating to an estimated ~1.53 for the home side; similarly Videoton has attacking xG 1.44 and xG against versus Szeged 1.08 giving ~1.26; averaging seasonal values and xG leads to 1.43/1.12. A Poisson model with lambda=2.55 estimates ~47% chance for Over 2.5 goals and ~25% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (approx ~73% after accounting for seasonal shares and xG). Although Szeged has 54% clean sheets this season, Videoton’s greater tendency to exceed 1.5 goals away and the calculated xG support backing Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Szeged led at the break in 54% of their home matches and averages 0.77 goals by half-time, while Videoton has an HT average of 0.5, which strongly favors the home side after 45 minutes. The hosts have won the full match in 46% of home fixtures, whereas the visitors win only 25% of away games and concede an average of 1.42 goals per match compared to 0.62 conceded by Szeged, so the final advantage lies with Szeged. xG analysis shows Szeged generates 1.33 xG while Videoton allows 1.73 xG per match, indicating realistic opportunities for the hosts despite the visitors’ higher conversion rate (11% vs 8%). At the same time, the risk of a turnaround after the break is real: Videoton has an AVG_2hg_away of 1.75 and scores on average 0.83 goals in the second half, with their second halves ending with >0.5 goals in 100% of cases. Therefore the most likely scenario based on the data is Szeged leading at half-time and the hosts winning after 90 minutes (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Szeged 2011 | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Videoton is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.8 pts / match - Videoton
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Videoton is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.28 goals / match - Videoton
Videoton is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.12 goals / match - Szeged 2011 · 1 goals / match - Videoton
Szeged 2011 scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).
Videoton scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Szeged 2011
Over / Under - Videoton
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Videoton is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.92 pts / match - Szeged 2011 · 1.6 pts / match - Videoton
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Szeged 2011 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Videoton - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Szeged 2011
Videoton
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Szeged 2011 | Liga | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.16 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 48% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 44% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 29% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 70% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 81% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Szeged 2011 0 - 0 - 1 Videoton. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?
The NB II match finished Szeged 2011 0:3 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?
Szeged 2011 score 1.04 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.28. The NB II average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Szeged 2011's matches and 48% of Videoton's.
What form are Szeged 2011 and Videoton in?
Over the last 5 games Szeged 2011 have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Videoton 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Szeged 2011 vs Videoton?
The statistical background for Szeged 2011 vs Videoton — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


