Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 20 September 2026

Tabor Sežana vs Krško: match statistics

Tabor Sežana crest
Tabor Sežana
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Krško crest
Krško
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Tabor Sežana presents a decisive advantage in all key aspects of the game. The hosts sit in 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 11 wins, while Krško is in 12th position with only 5 victories. The home form of Tabor is particularly telling - a 56% win rate, 56% clean sheets, and only 0.44 goals conceded on average per home match. Krško, conversely, has not recorded a single clean sheet on the road, conceding an average of 2.11 goals, with a goal difference of -11 in away matches. Additionally, the hosts dominate in ball possession (58% vs 39%), shot efficiency, and xG parameters (1.75 vs 1.23). All statistics point to a confident victory for Tabor Sežana in front of their home crowd.

Tabor Sežana vs Krško: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tabor Sežana played Krško in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 14 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Tabor Sežana: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Krško: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tabor Sežana scores 1.28 and concedes 0.72 goals per match. Krško scores 0.78 and concedes 2.11. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tabor Sežana 33%, Krško 39%. Over 2.5: Tabor Sežana 33%, Krško 56%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Tabor Sežana has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.19. Tabor Sežana: 13.7 shots per match, Krško: 9.1.

Match halves

Tabor Sežana: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.72. Krško: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Tabor Sežana: 31-45+ (6 goals). Krško: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tabor Sežana presents a decisive advantage in all key aspects of the game. The hosts sit in 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 11 wins, while Krško is in 12th position with only 5 victories. The home form of Tabor is particularly telling - a 56% win rate, 56% clean sheets, and only 0.44 goals conceded on average per home match. Krško, conversely, has not recorded a single clean sheet on the road, conceding an average of 2.11 goals, with a goal difference of -11 in away matches. Additionally, the hosts dominate in ball possession (58% vs 39%), shot efficiency, and xG parameters (1.75 vs 1.23). All statistics point to a confident victory for Tabor Sežana in front of their home crowd.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
Tabor SežanaKrško
13Shots5
Tabor SežanaKrško
4Shots on target1
Tabor SežanaKrško
1.8xG0.75
Tabor SežanaKrško
5Corners6
Tabor SežanaKrško
96Dangerous attacks49
Tabor SežanaKrško
-1Fouls-1
Tabor SežanaKrško
-1Cards-1
Tabor SežanaKrško

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tabor SežanaKrško
1.28Goals scored / match0.78
Tabor SežanaKrško
0.72Goals conceded / match2.11
Tabor SežanaKrško
56%Average possession41%
Tabor SežanaKrško
4.89Shots on target / match3.56
Tabor SežanaKrško

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.72Shots per match9.06
Tabor SežanaKrško
4.89Shots on target3.56
Tabor SežanaKrško
9.3%Shot conversion8.6%
Tabor SežanaKrško
56%Possession41%
Tabor SežanaKrško
1.76xG for1.19
Tabor SežanaKrško
1.3xG against2.07
Tabor SežanaKrško

Shooting quality

Tabor Sežana: BalancedKrško: Balanced
Tabor SežanaKrško
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tabor Sežana is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Tabor Sežana · 1.4 pts / match - Krško

Tabor Sežana
WLWWD
Season result split
61% W22% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-3
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Krško
WWLLD
Season result split
28% W11% D61% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-11
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tabor Sežana is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

1.28 goals / match - Tabor Sežana · 0.78 goals / match - Krško

Tabor Sežana is 193% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.72 goals / match - Tabor Sežana · 2.11 goals / match - Krško

Tabor Sežana scoring profile: very strong

Tabor Sežana scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Krško keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 matches).

Krško scoring profile: more difficult

Krško scores in 44% of matches (8 of 18 matches), while Tabor Sežana keeps a clean sheet in 61% (11 of 18 matches).

23Goals scored (season)14
Tabor SežanaKrško
13Goals conceded (season)38
Tabor SežanaKrško
2Average goals in match2.89
Tabor SežanaKrško
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Tabor SežanaKrško
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Tabor SežanaKrško

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal44%
Tabor SežanaKrško
33%2 goals28%
Tabor SežanaKrško
11%3 goals6%
Tabor SežanaKrško
0%4 goals0%
Tabor SežanaKrško

How often they concede at least...

39%1 goal94%
Tabor SežanaKrško
11%2 goals50%
Tabor SežanaKrško
11%3 goals28%
Tabor SežanaKrško
6%4 goals22%
Tabor SežanaKrško

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time6%
Tabor SežanaKrško
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tabor SežanaKrško
17%Scored in both halves22%
Tabor SežanaKrško

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
Tabor SežanaKrško
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS28%
Tabor SežanaKrško
20%BTTS - last 540%
Tabor SežanaKrško

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Tabor SežanaKrško
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
Tabor SežanaKrško
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Tabor SežanaKrško

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Tabor SežanaKrško
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Tabor SežanaKrško
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Tabor SežanaKrško

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tabor Sežana is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / match - Tabor Sežana · 0.89 pts / match - Krško

Tabor Sežana - half-time state
39% leading44% draw17% trailing
Krško - half-time state
22% leading22% draw56% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per match (1st half)0.89
Tabor SežanaKrško
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.28
Tabor SežanaKrško
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)1
Tabor SežanaKrško
0.89Average goals (1st half)1.28
Tabor SežanaKrško
78%Clean sheet before half-time39%
Tabor SežanaKrško
56%No goal before half-time72%
Tabor SežanaKrško

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.06
Tabor SežanaKrško
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Tabor SežanaKrško
0.39Goals conceded (2nd half)1.11
Tabor SežanaKrško
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Tabor SežanaKrško
72%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Tabor SežanaKrško
44%No goal after half-time61%
Tabor SežanaKrško

Tabor Sežana - second-half results

33% W56% D11% L
29
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Krško - second-half results

28% W22% D50% L
16
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tabor Sežana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Krško - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tabor Sežana
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
6
1
31-45
6
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Krško
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
1
7
16-30
2
7
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
9
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tabor Sežana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Krško

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.88
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

Tabor SežanaLigaKrško
Average goals in match 2.002.85 2.89
Both teams scored 33%47% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%54% 56%
Clean sheets 61%30% 6%
Goal before half-time 56%78% 83%
Goal after half-time 61%79% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tabor SežanaGoalŽan Žabkar

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tabor Sežana 1 - 0 - 0 Krško. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

NK Krško
0 : 2
MND Tabor Sežana

FAQ

What was the result of Tabor Sežana vs Krško?

The 2. SNL match finished Tabor Sežana 1:0 Krško. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tabor Sežana vs Krško?

Tabor Sežana score 1.28 goals per game on average and Krško 0.78. The 2. SNL average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tabor Sežana's matches and 39% of Krško's.

What form are Tabor Sežana and Krško in?

Over the last 5 games Tabor Sežana have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Krško 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tabor Sežana vs Krško?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tabor Sežana vs Krško: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.