Tabor Sežana vs Triglav: match statistics
Tabor Sežana vs Triglav: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tabor Sežana played Triglav in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Tabor Sežana: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Triglav: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tabor Sežana scores 1.26 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Triglav scores 2.59 and concedes 0.85. League average: 2.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tabor Sežana 41%, Triglav 37%. Over 2.5: Tabor Sežana 41%, Triglav 59%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.91 vs 1.63. Tabor Sežana: 12.3 shots per match, Triglav: 14.5.
Match halves
Tabor Sežana: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.74. Triglav: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.41.
Goals by minute
Tabor Sežana: 76-90+ (10 goals). Triglav: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Triglav is the clear favorite: the visitors have 19 wins this season versus Tabor’s 14 and sit 3rd while the hosts are 5th. In their last 5 matches Triglav are 5/5, scoring 12 and conceding just 1, whereas Tabor have lost all 5, scoring 3 and conceding 10. The visitors are markedly more efficient — averaging 2.23 goals per away game with xG 1.75 and a conversion rate of 16%, versus the hosts’ 0.92 goals per game with xG 1.60 and 8% conversion. Tabor at home concedes only 0.62 on average and have 54% clean sheets, but the last 5 matches (10 goals conceded) and the lower average of shots on target (3.85 vs 5.23) indicate a temporary defensive weakness. Considering form (3 pts average in the last 5 for Triglav vs 0 for Tabor) and the +70–34 goal difference in favor of the visitors, I expect a Triglav victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal goals average for Tabor Sežana is 2.93 per match, but in the last 5 games they have scored only 3 goals (0.6 avg) and conceded 10 goals (2.0 avg), while Triglav has 2.23 goals per match for the season and in the last 5 scored 12 goals (2.4 avg) and conceded only 1 (0.2 avg). From an xG perspective season xG are 2.05 for the home side and 1.75 for the visitors, and xG against are 1.20 and 1.35, yielding theoretical expected goals around 1.70 (Tabor) and 1.48 (Triglav) which would normally favor BTTS. However defensive signals and clean sheet stats contradict this: Triglav has 62% clean sheets for the season and only 1 conceded goal in their last five matches, and season BTTS rates are 43% (Tabor) and 31% (Triglav), both below the league average of 49%. Considering the five-match crisis of the hosts (3–10 in goals) and the excellent form of the visitors (12–1 in goals and a 5-win streak), I assign a higher probability to the 'No Goal' scenario. I assess BTTS at 35% for 'Yes' and 65% for 'No' and recommend backing 'No' as the most likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects 1.70 goals for Tabor Sežana and 1.48 for Triglav, totaling 3.18 goals. Season stats show Tabor with 93% of matches over 1.5 goals and Triglav 77% (average 85%), while over 2.5 goals are 64% vs 54% (average 59%). Additionally, xG and shot data support the outcome: Tabor has xG 2.05, 15.36 shots, and 6.5 shots on target with a 19% conversion, Triglav has xG 1.75, 13.54 shots, and 5.23 shots on target with a 16% conversion, indicating good goal-scoring chance potential. The last 5 matches confirm the visitors' form: Tabor scored 3 and conceded 10 (0.6 scored per match), Triglav scored 12 and conceded 1 (2.4 per match), which increases the likelihood of goals at both ends. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, play Over) — I rate Over 1.5 as the preferred pick, and Over 2.5 also looks likely (approx. 66%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First and foremost form: Tabor Sežana are in form 'lllll' (0 wins in the last 5), while Triglav are 'wwwww' (5/5, 100% wins), which already shifts the balance in favor of the visitors. Although seasonally both sides have similar half-time metrics (the home team scores on average 1.21 goals by half-time, the visitors 1.15), in the last 5 matches Triglav led at the break in 60% of games, while Tabor only in 20%, and on average in those five matches the visitors scored 0.8 goals by half-time vs 0.2 for the hosts. Over the season Tabor have an xG of 2.05 versus Triglav’s 1.75 and season-long win rates of 64% (home) vs 77% (away), but the key point is that in the last 5 matches the visitors concede on average only 0.2 goals, whereas the hosts concede 2.0, which favors the defensive stability of the visitors. Therefore the safest scenario is visitors leading at half-time and winning at full-time (HT/FT 2/2) — I estimate 39%; the second strong signal is draw at half-time and visitor win at full-time (HT/FT X/2) at 18%; the combined chance of Triglav winning after 90 minutes is about 62%. Options such as the hosts leading at half-time and holding on (HT/FT 1/1 at 6%) are unlikely given the hosts’ 0 points in the last 5 and just 0.2 goals scored by half-time in those matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tabor Sežana | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 106% better for: goals scored per match.
1.26 goals / match - Tabor Sežana · 2.59 goals / match - Triglav
Triglav is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Tabor Sežana · 0.85 goals / match - Triglav
Tabor Sežana scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 52% (14 of 27 matches).
Triglav scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Tabor Sežana keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tabor Sežana
Over / Under - Triglav
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / match - Tabor Sežana · 1.93 pts / match - Triglav
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tabor Sežana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tabor Sežana
Triglav
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Tabor Sežana | Liga | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.26 | 2.81 | ▲ 3.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 49% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 29% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 74% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 81% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tabor Sežana 1 - 0 - 0 Triglav. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tabor Sežana vs Triglav?
The 2. SNL match finished Tabor Sežana 0:1 Triglav. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tabor Sežana vs Triglav?
Tabor Sežana score 1.26 goals per game on average and Triglav 2.59. The 2. SNL average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Tabor Sežana's matches and 37% of Triglav's.
What form are Tabor Sežana and Triglav in?
Over the last 5 games Tabor Sežana have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Triglav 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tabor Sežana vs Triglav?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


