United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 07 September 2026

Tacoma Defiance vs Houston Dynamo FC II: match statistics

Tacoma Defiance vs Houston Dynamo FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tacoma Defiance played Houston Dynamo FC II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 18 June 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Tacoma Defiance: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Houston Dynamo FC II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tacoma Defiance scores 1.00 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Houston Dynamo FC II scores 2.42 and concedes 0.67. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tacoma Defiance 38%, Houston Dynamo FC II 50%. Over 2.5: Tacoma Defiance 54%, Houston Dynamo FC II 58%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Houston Dynamo FC II has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.36. Tacoma Defiance: 11.6 shots per match, Houston Dynamo FC II: 14.8.

Match halves

Tacoma Defiance: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.62. Houston Dynamo FC II: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

Tacoma Defiance: 46-60 (4 goals). Houston Dynamo FC II: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorites are the visitors — Houston Dynamo FC II; they sit 2nd in the table versus Tacoma Defiance’s 24th and record 9 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, while Tacoma have 3 wins, 3 draws and 7 losses. Offensively Houston clearly dominates: 29 goals this season and an average of 2.0 goals on the road versus Tacoma’s 13 goals and 1.14 average at home; in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 12 goals, the hosts only 5. Houston averages 14.38 shots and 6.38 on target per away match with a conversion rate around 14%, while Tacoma at home average 12.14 shots and 4.86 on target with a conversion around 9%; additionally Tacoma failed to score in 43% of their home games, whereas Houston have 0% such away matches. Defensively both teams concede on average 1.0 goal per match, however Houston have a better away goal difference (+8) and higher attacking xG 1.72 versus Tacoma’s 1.47 at home; Houston allow opponent xG of 1.9, which suggests opponents create many chances, but the visitors deal with them effectively, conceding only 1.0 actual goal per game. Considering 29 vs 13 goals, the advantage in shots on target (6.38 vs 4.86) and conversion (14% vs 9%), as well as the better points average in the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.4), I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS comes from Houston: season BTTS rate is 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, with an average of 2.4 goals per game in those five (12 goals) and conceding 1.2 on average. The league overall records 62% of matches with both teams scoring and an average of 3.23 goals per match, which supports a both-teams-to-score scenario. Tacoma has a season BTTS of 0% and 100% clean sheets, but in the last 5 their BTTS rose to 20% with averages of 1.0 goals scored and 1.2 conceded (5 for, 6 against), so the defensive setup is less stable than season figures suggest. xG comparison shows that in the last 5 Houston has xG_for 1.73 versus xG_against_home 1.44 (visitors create realistic chances), while Tacoma has last5 xG_for 1.23 versus xG_against_away 1.5, so the home side also has some scoring potential. Based on this I assign 70% to BTTS = Yes and 30% to BTTS = No, because the combination of the 75%/80% guest trend, the league 62% and the specific xG and goal averages (2.4 vs 1.2) produces a stronger signal for both teams to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model projects approximately 1.84 xG for Tacoma and 1.29 xG for Houston, totaling ~3.13 goals. Both teams regularly exceed the 1.5-goal threshold: Tacoma has 100% of matches over 1.5 this season, and Houston 88%. Tacoma averages 15.75 shots with 6.0 on target and has a 21% conversion rate, while Houston averages 14.38 shots with 6.38 on target and a 14% conversion, supporting a higher score; in the last 5 matches the combined goals per game average is 2.2 for Tacoma and 3.6 for Houston. Consequently the strongest market signal is Over 1.5 (over 90% probability), Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~72%), whereas the 3.5 line leans to Under (~64%), since the expected 3.13 goals remain below 3.5 and historical Over3.5 shares are 50% for Tacoma and 38% for Houston.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tacoma averages 3.25 goals per match and concedes no goals at home (seasonConcededAVG_home 0.0; seasonCSPercentage_home 100.0), which strongly favors a home victory. At half-time the hosts average 1.25 goals and lead in 50% of matches (scoredAVGHT_home 1.25; leadingAtHTPercentage_home 50.0), while Houston has 0.75 goals at the break and concedes 0.25 (scoredAVGHT_away 0.75; concededAVGHT_away 0.25), so Tacoma’s advantage is already evident before half-time. Tacoma scored 3 goals in minutes 31–45 versus 2 for Houston (goals_scored_min_31_to_45_home 3.0 vs goals_scored_min_31_to_45_away 2.0), increasing the likelihood of a host goal before the end of the first half. Additionally the hosts have a slightly higher xG (xg_for_avg_home 1.77 vs 1.72), better defensive xG conceded (xg_against_avg_home 0.86 vs xg_against_avg_away 1.9) and higher shot conversion rate (21.0% vs 14.0%), therefore the most likely scenario is Tacoma leading at half-time and holding on to win (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
13Shots12
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
4Shots on target5
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
1.4xG1.46
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
4Corners4
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
41Dangerous attacks48
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
15Fouls12
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
4Cards0
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
1Goals scored / match2.42
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
1.46Goals conceded / match0.67
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
45%Average possession48%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
3.77Shots on target / match6.25
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.62Shots per match14.83
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
3.77Shots on target6.25
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
8.6%Shot conversion16.3%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
45%Possession48%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
1.36xG for1.74
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
1.54xG against1.52
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

Shooting quality

Tacoma Defiance: BalancedHouston Dynamo FC II: Attacking
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)32%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Houston Dynamo FC II is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance · 2 pts / match - Houston Dynamo FC II

Tacoma Defiance
DLWWL
Season result split
23% W23% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Houston Dynamo FC II
WWDWL
Season result split
75% W17% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-1
2.42 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Houston Dynamo FC II is 142% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance · 2.42 goals / match - Houston Dynamo FC II

Houston Dynamo FC II is 118% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance · 0.67 goals / match - Houston Dynamo FC II

Tacoma Defiance scoring profile: mixed

Tacoma Defiance scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Houston Dynamo FC II keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).

Houston Dynamo FC II scoring profile: very strong

Houston Dynamo FC II scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

13Goals scored (season)29
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
19Goals conceded (season)8
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
2.46Average goals in match3.08
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
5Goals scored (last 5)12
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal100%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
31%2 goals67%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
8%3 goals42%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
8%4 goals25%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal50%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
46%2 goals8%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
15%3 goals8%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
8%4 goals0%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Houston Dynamo FC II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 12 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time8%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
15%Scored in both halves42%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
20%BTTS - last 580%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Houston Dynamo FC II is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance · 1.75 pts / match - Houston Dynamo FC II

Tacoma Defiance - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing
Houston Dynamo FC II - half-time state
42% leading50% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.75
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.92
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
0.92Average goals (1st half)1.08
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
54%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
77%No goal before half-time50%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)2.17
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
1.54Average goals (2nd half)2
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
38%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II
54%No goal after half-time8%
Tacoma DefianceHouston Dynamo FC II

Tacoma Defiance - second-half results

23% W38% R38% P
13
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Houston Dynamo FC II - second-half results

67% W17% R17% P
21
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding179%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tacoma Defiance - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Houston Dynamo FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tacoma Defiance
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
0
16-30
1
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Houston Dynamo FC II
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
0
31-45
6
3
46-60
6
1
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tacoma Defiance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Houston Dynamo FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
37%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Tacoma DefianceLigaHouston Dynamo FC II
Average goals in match 2.463.25 3.08
Both teams scored 38%62% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%65% 58%
Clean sheets 23%21% 50%
Goal before half-time 54%75% 58%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardXavi Gnaulati
  2. Houston Dynamo FC IIGoalVinicius SilvaAssist: Isaac Mwakutuya
  3. Tacoma DefianceGoalMark BronnikAssist: Charles Gaffney
  4. Tacoma DefianceGoalEdson Carli
  5. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardRafael Jauregui
  6. Houston Dynamo FC IISubstitutionOn: Mamadi JianaOff: Myles Gardner
  7. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardMark Bronnik
  8. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Mitchell EmertOff: Codey Phoenix
  9. Tacoma DefianceYellow cardEdson Carli
  10. Houston Dynamo FC IISubstitutionOn: David GarciaOff: Jahmani Jahi Camilo Bell
  11. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Leonardo Flores GonzalezOff: Mark Bronnik
  12. Houston Dynamo FC IISubstitutionOn: Micah HarrisOff: Gavin Wolff
  13. Tacoma DefianceSubstitutionOn: Daniel RoblesOff: Mark O'Neill

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Tacoma Defiance 2 - 0 - 1 Houston Dynamo FC II. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Houston Dynamo FC II
4 : 0
Tacoma Defiance
Tacoma Defiance
5 : 1
Houston Dynamo FC II
Houston Dynamo FC II
1 : 2
Tacoma Defiance

FAQ

What was the result of Tacoma Defiance vs Houston Dynamo FC II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Tacoma Defiance 2:1 Houston Dynamo FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tacoma Defiance and Houston Dynamo FC II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Tacoma Defiance won 2, Houston Dynamo FC II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tacoma Defiance vs Houston Dynamo FC II?

Tacoma Defiance score 1.00 goals per game on average and Houston Dynamo FC II 2.42. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Tacoma Defiance's matches and 50% of Houston Dynamo FC II's.

What form are Tacoma Defiance and Houston Dynamo FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Tacoma Defiance have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Houston Dynamo FC II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tacoma Defiance vs Houston Dynamo FC II?

The statistical background for Tacoma Defiance vs Houston Dynamo FC II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.