Tadamon Sour vs Al Hikma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tadamon Sour played Al Hikma in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match was played on 19 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Tadamon Sour: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Hikma: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tadamon Sour scores 0.78 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Al Hikma scores 1.33 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tadamon Sour 33%, Al Hikma 44%. Over 2.5: Tadamon Sour 33%, Al Hikma 56%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hikma has higher xG: 1.05 vs 0.78. Tadamon Sour: 3.6 shots per match, Al Hikma: 7.2.

Match halves

Tadamon Sour: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.44. Al Hikma: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Tadamon Sour: 16-30 (2 goals). Al Hikma: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
6Shots5
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
1Shots on target1
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0.66xG0.77
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
2Corners3
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
29Dangerous attacks53
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
-1Fouls-1
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
-1Cards-1
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0.78Goals scored / match1.33
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
1Goals conceded / match1.22
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
43%Average possession49%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
1.67Shots on target / match3.67
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.56Shots per match7.22
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
1.67Shots on target3.67
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
21.9%Shot conversion18.5%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
43%Possession49%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0.78xG for1.05
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
1.05xG against0.97
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

Shooting quality

Tadamon Sour: Counter-attackingAl Hikma: Efficient finishing
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
Accuracy (shots on target)47%51%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tadamon Sour is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Tadamon Sour · 1.2 pts / match - Al Hikma

Tadamon Sour
LDWWD
Season result split
22% W44% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-3
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-2
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Al Hikma
WWLLL
Season result split
44% W11% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-4
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
DWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Hikma is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

0.78 goals / match - Tadamon Sour · 1.33 goals / match - Al Hikma

Tadamon Sour is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Tadamon Sour · 1.22 goals / match - Al Hikma

Tadamon Sour scoring profile: mixed

Tadamon Sour scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 matches).

Al Hikma scoring profile: strong

Al Hikma scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Tadamon Sour keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 matches).

7Goals scored (season)12
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
9Goals conceded (season)11
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
1.78Average goals in match2.56
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal89%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
11%2 goals33%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
11%3 goals11%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0%4 goals0%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal44%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
33%2 goals44%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
22%3 goals22%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0%4 goals11%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

31%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time22%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
11%Scored in both halves33%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0%BTTS - last 560%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

2nd half

44%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Hikma is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Tadamon Sour · 1.22 pts / match - Al Hikma

Tadamon Sour - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing
Al Hikma - half-time state
33% leading22% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.22
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
1Average goals (1st half)1.22
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
67%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
67%No goal before half-time44%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.67
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
0.78Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma
67%No goal after half-time33%
Tadamon SourAl Hikma

Tadamon Sour - second-half results

11% W78% R11% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Hikma - second-half results

44% W33% R22% P
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tadamon Sour - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.80.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Al Hikma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tadamon Sour
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
3
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Hikma
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
6
0
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tadamon Sour

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Al Hikma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

Tadamon SourLigaAl Hikma
Average goals in match 1.782.27 2.56
Both teams scored 33%31% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%42% 56%
Clean sheets 56%42% 56%
Goal before half-time 56%56% 78%
Goal after half-time 44%75% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.27
Average goals per match
31%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.08
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+-9%
Home attack advantage
+-10%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Tadamon Sour vs Al Hikma?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Tadamon Sour 0:0 Al Hikma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tadamon Sour vs Al Hikma?

Tadamon Sour score 0.78 goals per game on average and Al Hikma 1.33. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tadamon Sour's matches and 44% of Al Hikma's.

What form are Tadamon Sour and Al Hikma in?

Over the last 5 games Tadamon Sour have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Hikma 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tadamon Sour vs Al Hikma?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tadamon Sour vs Al Hikma: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.