Estonia - MeistriliigaA. Le Coq ArenaData current as of 08 September 2026

Tallinna FC Flora vs Paide: match statistics

Tallinna FC Flora crest
Tallinna FC Flora
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Paide crest
Paide

Tallinna FC Flora vs Paide: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tallinna FC Flora played Paide in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 21 June 2026. Venue: A. Le Coq Arena. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Tallinna FC Flora: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Paide: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tallinna FC Flora scores 2.13 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Paide scores 1.50 and concedes 1.25. League average: 3.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tallinna FC Flora 33%, Paide 63%. Over 2.5: Tallinna FC Flora 73%, Paide 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Tallinna FC Flora has higher xG: 2.08 vs 1.56. Tallinna FC Flora: 17.1 shots per match, Paide: 13.1.

Match halves

Tallinna FC Flora: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20. Paide: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Tallinna FC Flora: 61-75 (9 goals). Paide: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Meistriliiga: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-2. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back Tallinna FC Flora to win; the hosts average 2.71 goals per home game versus Paide’s 1.88 on the road. Flora concede only 0.71 goals at home, while Paide concede 1.5 away, and the hosts have 57% clean sheets compared to just 13% for the visitors. This is supported by xG values — Flora’s home xG is 1.95 with xG against 1.38, whereas Paide record xG 1.71 and xG against 1.53 — indicating higher quality chance creation for the hosts. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 15 goals and recorded 4 wins, averaging 2.4 points per game, while Paide scored 4 goals, won only once and averaged 1.0 point per game. Considering the higher conversion rate (17% vs 13%), more shots on target (5.57 vs 5.0) and 71% home win rate versus Paide’s 38% away win rate, I rate the hosts’ chances significantly higher.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Key signals favor BTTS - Yes: Paide has a season BTTS of 75% and only 13% clean sheets, while Flora has BTTS 50% and 38% clean sheets, which together increases the likelihood both teams will score. Paide averages 1.88 goals per match, produces 1.71 xG, attempts 14.38 shots with 5.0 on target, and has a conversion rate of 13%; Flora has 1.13 goals, 1.41 xG, 11.75 shots and 3.0 shots on target, so the visitors are more active offensively. Flora has scored 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per match) and conceded 5 goals (1.0 per match), while Paide in the last 5 had 4 scored (0.8) and 8 conceded (1.6), indicating Flora is in scoring form and Paide is prone to conceding. Additionally, the league average goals is 3.08 and the season BTTS rate is 54%, and the fact both teams have BTTS at 60% in their last 5 matches supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. Based on this I assess the probability of BTTS at about 72% for 'Yes' and 28% for 'No', therefore I recommend the 'Yes' bet as the strongest signal from the available data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model combining offensive xG and opponent-adjusted xG yields expected goals of 1.47 for Tallinna FC Flora (xG attack 1.41, xG against Paide 1.53) and 1.63 for Paide (xG attack 1.71, xG against Flora 1.55), total 3.10 goals. In the last 5 matches Flora averaged 3.0 goals (15 goals) and Paide 0.8 (4 goals), with Paide registering more shots on target (5.0 vs 3.0) and a higher seasonal xG (1.71 vs 1.41), which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Season percentages show Flora’s matches have a 50% rate of games over 1.5 goals and Paide 75%, while the league averages 3.08 goals per match — additional supports for goals. With an expected total of 3.10 goals, calculated probabilities suggest approximately 82% for Over 1.5, 60% for Over 2.5 and 37% for Over 3.5. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (line 1.5, Over) — the high probability edge of 82% combined with xG and form alignment (Flora: 100% of last 5 matches over 2.5) gives an advantage for this play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tallinna FC Flora are in better form: in their last 5 matches they won 4 of 5 (80%) and led at the break in 60% of games, averaging 1.4 goals by Half-Time, whereas Paide have 1 win in the last 5 (20%) and average 0.4 HT goals. Season-long metrics favor Paide in chance creation (xG 1.71 vs Flora’s 1.41 and 5.0 shots on target vs 3.0), which explains their higher season BTTS rate of 75% versus the hosts’ 50%. Nonetheless, Flora’s superiority in recent results (an average of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 compared to Paide’s 1.0) and more frequent leads at the break lead me to expect the hosts to take a HT lead and hold it. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (44%), with a meaningful probability for a turnaround after an HT draw (X/1 16%) and a possibility of goals from both sides (e.g. X/2 7% and 2/2 6%) due to the visitors’ xG and shots advantage.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
20Shots15
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
8Shots on target7
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
2.5xG1.98
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
5Corners7
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
95Dangerous attacks75
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
11Fouls11
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
3Cards1
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tallinna FC FloraPaide
2.13Goals scored / match1.5
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
1.07Goals conceded / match1.25
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
59%Average possession54%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
5.67Shots on target / match4
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.07Shots per match13.06
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
5.67Shots on target4
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
12.5%Shot conversion11.5%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
59%Possession54%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
2.08xG for1.56
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
1.26xG against1.54
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

Shooting quality

Tallinna FC Flora: DominantPaide: Balanced
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
Accuracy (shots on target)33%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tallinna FC Flora is 140% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Tallinna FC Flora · 1 pts / match - Paide

Tallinna FC Flora
WWWLW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-0-5
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.35Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Paide
LLDDW
Season result split
44% W25% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-5
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tallinna FC Flora is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

2.13 goals / match - Tallinna FC Flora · 1.5 goals / match - Paide

Tallinna FC Flora is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Tallinna FC Flora · 1.25 goals / match - Paide

Tallinna FC Flora scoring profile: very strong

Tallinna FC Flora scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Paide scoring profile: strong

Paide scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Tallinna FC Flora keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

32Goals scored (season)24
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
16Goals conceded (season)20
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
3.2Average goals in match2.75
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
11Goals scored (last 5)4
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal88%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
60%2 goals38%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
33%3 goals19%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
20%4 goals6%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal75%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
27%2 goals38%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
20%3 goals13%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
7%4 goals0%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
Tallinna FC Flora - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 15 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time19%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
0%BTTS in both halves13%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
47%Scored in both halves31%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
40%BTTS - last 560%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tallinna FC Flora - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Paide - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.63
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
0.93Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.13
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
67%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
47%No goal before half-time44%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

After half-time (2nd half)

1.93Points per match (2nd half)1.25
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
1.87Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
67%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide
27%No goal after half-time38%
Tallinna FC FloraPaide

Tallinna FC Flora - second-half results

60% W13% R27% P
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding168%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paide - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tallinna FC Flora - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Paide - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tallinna FC Flora
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
0
31-45
4
4
46-60
9
3
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Paide
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
1
31-45
4
0
46-60
4
5
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tallinna FC Flora

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.82
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Paide

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

Tallinna FC FloraLigaPaide
Average goals in match 3.203.05 2.75
Both teams scored 33%55% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%63% 50%
Clean sheets 47%24% 25%
Goal before half-time 73%72% 63%
Goal after half-time 93%90% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.72
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tallinna FC FloraGoalDanil KuraksinAssist: Tony Varjund
  2. PaideYellow cardMartin Miller
  3. Tallinna FC FloraYellow cardMihhail Kolobov
  4. PaideSubstitutionOn: Henrik OjamaaOff: Kristofer Piht
  5. Tallinna FC FloraSubstitutionOn: Rauno AllikuOff: Danil Kuraksin
  6. PaideGoalHenri Anier
  7. Tallinna FC FloraYellow cardRauno Alliku
  8. Tallinna FC FloraYellow cardSander Tovstik

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Tallinna FC Flora 2 - 1 - 2 Paide. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Paide
1 : 2
Tallinna FC Flora
Paide Linnameeskond
1 : 1
Tallinna FC Flora
Paide Linnameeskond
2 : 1
Tallinna FC Flora
Tallinna FC Flora
1 : 2
Paide Linnameeskond
Tallinna FC Flora
1 : 0
Paide Linnameeskond

FAQ

What was the result of Tallinna FC Flora vs Paide?

The Meistriliiga match finished Tallinna FC Flora 1:2 Paide. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tallinna FC Flora and Paide?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tallinna FC Flora won 2, Paide won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tallinna FC Flora vs Paide?

Tallinna FC Flora score 2.13 goals per game on average and Paide 1.50. The Meistriliiga average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tallinna FC Flora's matches and 63% of Paide's.

What form are Tallinna FC Flora and Paide in?

Over the last 5 games Tallinna FC Flora have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Paide 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tallinna FC Flora vs Paide?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tallinna FC Flora vs Paide: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.