Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Louisville City: match statistics
Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Louisville City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tampa Bay Rowdies played Louisville City in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Final score: 5:4.
Current form
Tampa Bay Rowdies: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Louisville City: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.56 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Louisville City scores 1.63 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tampa Bay Rowdies 44%, Louisville City 56%. Over 2.5: Tampa Bay Rowdies 38%, Louisville City 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Louisville City has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.77. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 16.0 shots per match, Louisville City: 16.5.
Match halves
Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.75. Louisville City: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (9 goals). Louisville City: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-3. Average goals 3.20, BTTS 80%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win. Tampa Bay Rowdies average 1.88 goals at home and have an xG of 1.97 with 17.88 shots and 5.88 shots on target, while Louisville average 1.75 goals away with 13.88 shots and 4.13 on target. Rowdies concede 1.25 goals at home, whereas visitors concede 1.75 away and have an xG against of 1.41, giving the hosts the advantage in chance quality (xG 1.97 vs 1.41). In the last 5 matches Rowdies scored 9 goals and are 3-1-1, averaging 2.0 points per game; Louisville scored 8 goals and are 2-2-1, averaging 1.6 points per game, which indicates better form for the hosts. Additionally, Rowdies have 38% clean sheets at home and only 13% of matches without scoring, while Louisville have 0% away matches without scoring and a higher shot conversion (13% vs 10%), so I expect Both Teams to Score, with an edge to Tampa Bay.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The dominant signal is BTTS - Yes for the visitors — Louisville has a season BTTS rate of 75% versus Tampa’s 38%, and in the last 5 matches both teams record BTTS at 60%. xG analysis supports the likelihood of both teams scoring: Tampa averages xG 2.20 while the average xG against Louisville is 1.41; Louisville’s xG is 1.71, higher than the average xG against Tampa of 0.95. Shot statistics also favor goals from both sides — Tampa averages 19.13 shots (5.88 on target), Louisville 13.88 (4.13 on target) with conversion rates of 13% for the visitors versus 8% for the home team. Although Tampa has a better defensive season record (only 15 goals conceded and 25% clean sheets), the last 5 matches (Tampa 9 scored/7 conceded, Louisville 8/7) and the league BTTS level of 56% indicate an open game. Based on this, I tip BTTS 'Yes' with a probability of 66% versus 34% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect 1.65 goals for Tampa Bay and 1.54 for Louisville, totaling 3.19 goals — values derived by averaging xG (home xG_for 2.20 vs Louisville xG_against 1.41 gives a base of 1.805) and seasonal scoring averages (1.50 vs 1.75), adjusted for shot conversion. Over 1.5 is the strongest signal: in 75% of Tampa Bay’s matches and 88% of Louisville’s matches there were more than 1.5 goals, and the combined seasonal goals average is 3.25 (1.5+1.75), so I price over 1.5 at 86%. For the 2.5 line we see mixed stats: Tampa Bay has 38% of matches over 2.5 vs 63% for Louisville, and in the last 5 matches over2.5 occurred about 40%/60%; with predicted 3.19 goals I give a 60% probability for over 2.5. Over 3.5 is less certain — the seasonal over 3.5 rate is 38% for both teams, and although shot volume (19.13 vs 13.88) and shots on target (5.88 vs 4.13) indicate chance creation, Tampa Bay’s low conversion 8% limits expected goals, therefore I rate over 3.5 at 38%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast HT/FT X/1 (draw at the break, Tampa Bay Rowdies win) with a probability of 40%. Seasonally the home side draws at the break in 63% of matches and the visitors in 75%, and both teams average 0.63 goals at half-time, indicating a high likelihood of an even first half. Nevertheless, the advantage should lie with the home team in the second half: Tampa Bay has a higher xG (2.20 vs 1.71), more shots (19.13 vs 13.88) and more shots on target (5.88 vs 4.13), and seasonally wins 50% of matches versus Louisville’s 38%. Additionally, in their last five games the home team have won 60% of matches and led at the break in 4 of 5 (80%), which suggests form favoring a turnaround after the interval. Therefore, as alternative scenarios I assign 20% to a draw after 90' (X/X), 14% in total to an away win (X/2 8% + 1/2 3% + 2/2 3%), and the remaining combinations distributed as 1/1 14%, 1/X 6%, 2/X 4% and 2/1 2%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tampa Bay Rowdies | Louisville City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Louisville City is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.6 pts / match - Louisville City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tampa Bay Rowdies is 93% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.81 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.56 goals / match - Louisville City
Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while Louisville City keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
Louisville City scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tampa Bay Rowdies
Over / Under — Louisville City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tampa Bay Rowdies is 127% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 0.88 pts / match - Louisville City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Louisville City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Louisville City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Tampa Bay Rowdies | Liga | Louisville City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.38 | 2.79 | ▲ 3.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 26% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 67% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Tampa Bay Rowdies 2 - 0 - 3 Louisville City. Average goals 3.20, both teams scored in 80% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Louisville City?
The USL Championship match finished Tampa Bay Rowdies 5:4 Louisville City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tampa Bay Rowdies and Louisville City?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tampa Bay Rowdies won 2, Louisville City won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Louisville City?
Tampa Bay Rowdies score 1.56 goals per game on average and Louisville City 1.63. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's matches and 56% of Louisville City's.
What form are Tampa Bay Rowdies and Louisville City in?
Over the last 5 games Tampa Bay Rowdies have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Louisville City 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Louisville City?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Louisville City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


