United States - USL ChampionshipAl Lang StadiumData current as of 14 October 2026

Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Miami FC II: match statistics

Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Miami FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tampa Bay Rowdies played Miami FC II in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 3 October 2026. Venue: Al Lang Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Tampa Bay Rowdies: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Miami FC II: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.73 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Miami FC II scores 1.33 and concedes 1.63. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tampa Bay Rowdies 38%, Miami FC II 56%. Over 2.5: Tampa Bay Rowdies 42%, Miami FC II 56%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Tampa Bay Rowdies has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.34. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 15.0 shots per match, Miami FC II: 11.4.

Match halves

Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Miami FC II: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (16 goals). Miami FC II: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 5-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tampa Bay Rowdies sit 1st in the table and win 67% of their home matches, while 20th-placed Miami FC II win 21% of their away games. The hosts average 2.33 goals and 6.08 shots on target per match at home; the visitors score just 0.86 goals away and fail to find the net in half of those matches. Tampa Bay’s advantage is also reflected in the quality of chances: their home xG is 1.95, while Miami concede chances worth an average xG of 1.67 away from home. Both teams have scored 7 goals in their last 5 matches, but the hosts have conceded just 3 in that period, compared with 9 by the visitors. This defensive gap, combined with Tampa Bay’s significantly more effective home form, points to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is the visitors’ lack of scoring efficiency: Miami FC II failed to score in 50% of its matches, and its season average is just 0.86 goals compared with Tampa Bay Rowdies’ 1.67. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 17% of their matches this season, but have conceded an average of just 0.6 goals across their last 5 games, increasing the risk that the visitors fail to score. On the other hand, BTTS - Yes landed in 67% of Tampa Bay’s matches and 43% of Miami’s, so a Goal/Goal outcome cannot be ruled out. Despite this uncertainty, Miami’s weaker scoring record and the hosts’ recent defensive improvement give a slight edge to the scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least 2 goals were scored in 83% of Tampa Bay Rowdies matches and 71% of Miami FC II matches, providing a strong basis for selecting Over 1.5 goals. The home side averages 1.67 goals per match, while the visitors concede 1.50, so Tampa should contribute the most to the projected total of 2.69 goals. Miami averages only 0.86 goals and failed to score in 50% of its matches, making the 2.5-goal line less reliable. Additionally, Tampa conceded a total of 3 goals in its last 5 appearances, compared with 9 for Miami, strengthening expectations of goals from the home side but offering less support for the higher line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is likely, as Miami FC II were level at the break in 10 of 14 matches, while Tampa Bay Rowdies were level in 2 of their last 5. The case for a home win is supported by their higher average goals scored this season — 1.67 compared with the visitors’ 0.86 — as well as their xG advantage: 1.46 to 1.22. In their last 5 matches, Tampa Bay conceded an average of 0.6 goals, compared with 1.8 for Miami, strengthening the hosts’ chances of winning. The likelihood of the match being decided after half-time is also supported by second-half averages: Tampa Bay scored 0.91 goals after the break, while Miami conceded 0.86. However, the X/1 pick is not a clear-cut one, as the hosts have conceded an average of 1.83 goals per match over the season.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
16Shots10
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
6Shots on target4
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
2.17xG1.42
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
7Corners7
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
102Dangerous attacks69
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
15Fouls13
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
1Cards0
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
1.73Goals scored / match1.33
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
0.88Goals conceded / match1.63
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
53%Average possession50%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
4.69Shots on target / match4.26
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.04Shots per match11.44
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
4.69Shots on target4.26
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
11.5%Shot conversion11.7%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
53%Possession50%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
1.7xG for1.34
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
1.17xG against1.63
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

Shooting quality

Tampa Bay Rowdies: AttackingMiami FC II: Balanced
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)31%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Miami FC II is 38% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 2.2 pts / match - Miami FC II

Tampa Bay Rowdies
DWLWD
Season result split
58% W27% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-7-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Miami FC II
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W33% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-10
1.22 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.73 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.33 goals / match - Miami FC II

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.63 goals / match - Miami FC II

Tampa Bay Rowdies scoring profile: very strong

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 matches).

Miami FC II scoring profile: mixed

Miami FC II scores in 63% of matches (17 of 27 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 matches).

45Goals scored (season)36
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
23Goals conceded (season)44
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
2.62Average goals in match2.96
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal63%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
50%2 goals44%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
27%3 goals15%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
8%4 goals11%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

How often they concede at least...

46%1 goal74%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
23%2 goals52%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
12%3 goals22%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
8%4 goals11%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Tampa Bay Rowdies - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 26 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time33%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
4%BTTS in both halves15%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
27%Scored in both halves33%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
20%BTTS - last 580%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.81 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies · 1.19 pts / match - Miami FC II

Tampa Bay Rowdies - half-time state
50% leading31% draw19% trailing
Miami FC II - half-time state
22% leading52% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.81Points per match (1st half)1.19
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.59
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.26
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
73%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
50%No goal before half-time52%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
62%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II
38%No goal after half-time56%
Tampa Bay RowdiesMiami FC II

Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results

42% W38% D19% L
47
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Miami FC II - second-half results

22% W44% D33% L
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tampa Bay Rowdies - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Miami FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tampa Bay Rowdies
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
8
5
16-30
5
3
31-45
9
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
16
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Miami FC II
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
5
5
16-30
9
8
31-45
5
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tampa Bay Rowdies

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Miami FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.98
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Tampa Bay RowdiesLigaMiami FC II
Average goals in match▼ 2.622.73▲ 2.96
Both teams scored▼ 38%54%▲ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 42%50%▲ 56%
Clean sheets▲ 54%28%▼ 26%
Goal before half-time▲ 69%66%▼ 63%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%78%▼ 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Diego MelloOff: Mason Tunbridge
  2. Tampa Bay RowdiesGoalCharlie OstremAssist: Nathan Dossantos
  3. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Thomas MustoOff: Riyon Tori
  4. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Walid YacoubouOff: Rodrigo Da Costa
  5. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Evan ConwayOff: Lewis Hilton
  6. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Leland ArcherOff: Laurence Wyke
  7. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Angelo CalfoOff: Mouhamadou Bachir Ndiaye
  8. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Jonathan Levin KolanguiOff: Matías Alexis Romero
  9. Tampa Bay RowdiesYellow cardCharlie Ostrem

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Tampa Bay Rowdies 5 - 0 - 0 Miami FC II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Miami FC II
2 : 3
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
2 : 1
Miami FC II
Miami FC II
1 : 2
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
2 : 0
Miami FC II
Miami FC II
2 : 5
Tampa Bay Rowdies

FAQ

What was the result of Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Miami FC II?

The USL Championship match finished Tampa Bay Rowdies 1:2 Miami FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tampa Bay Rowdies and Miami FC II?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tampa Bay Rowdies won 5, Miami FC II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Miami FC II?

Tampa Bay Rowdies score 1.73 goals per game on average and Miami FC II 1.33. The USL Championship average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's matches and 56% of Miami FC II's.

What form are Tampa Bay Rowdies and Miami FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Tampa Bay Rowdies have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Miami FC II 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Miami FC II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.