Singapore - S.LeagueData current as of 24 July 2026

Tanjong Pagar vs Geylang International: match statistics

125%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
250%(0.00)

Geylang International presents significantly better away form than Tanjong Pagar does at home. The hosts have won just 33% of home matches, conceding a massive average of 3.67 goals per match, with a zero percentage of clean sheets. The visitors, conversely, win half of their away matches (50%), maintaining 50% clean sheets and conceding an average of only 0.75 goals per game. The difference in defensive quality is immense - xG Against for the hosts is 2.51, while for the visitors it is only 1.29. Tanjong Pagar has lost four of their last five matches, whereas Geylang shows stability with a +2 goal difference on the road. All key indicators point to an advantage for the visitors, who should exploit the hosts' poor disposition.

Tanjong Pagar vs Geylang International: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanjong Pagar play Geylang International in S.League (Singapore). The match date is 6 February 2026 at 12:30. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Tanjong Pagar: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Geylang International: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanjong Pagar scores 0.81 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Geylang International scores 1.30 and concedes 1.90. League average: 3.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanjong Pagar 52%, Geylang International 55%. Over 2.5: Tanjong Pagar 86%, Geylang International 65%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Geylang International has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.15. Tanjong Pagar: 9.5 shots per match, Geylang International: 13.4.

Match halves

Tanjong Pagar: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.57. Geylang International: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Tanjong Pagar: 61-75 (5 goals). Geylang International: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

S.League: 3.57 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Geylang International presents significantly better away form than Tanjong Pagar does at home. The hosts have won just 33% of home matches, conceding a massive average of 3.67 goals per match, with a zero percentage of clean sheets. The visitors, conversely, win half of their away matches (50%), maintaining 50% clean sheets and conceding an average of only 0.75 goals per game. The difference in defensive quality is immense - xG Against for the hosts is 2.51, while for the visitors it is only 1.29. Tanjong Pagar has lost four of their last five matches, whereas Geylang shows stability with a +2 goal difference on the road. All key indicators point to an advantage for the visitors, who should exploit the hosts' poor disposition.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
13Shots11
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
6Shots on target5
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
1.7xG1.32
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
4Corners4
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
64Dangerous attacks38
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
11Fouls20
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
1Cards6
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tanjong PagarGeylang International
0.81Goals scored / match1.3
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
3Goals conceded / match1.9
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
42%Average possession47%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
3.19Shots on target / match4.1
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.52Shots per match13.4
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
3.19Shots on target4.1
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
8.5%Shot conversion9.7%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
42%Possession47%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
1.15xG for1.54
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
2.37xG against1.52
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

Shooting quality

Tanjong Pagar: BalancedGeylang International: Balanced
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Geylang International is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar · 0.8 pts / match - Geylang International

Tanjong Pagar
LLLLW
Season result split
10% W5% R86% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-18
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -46
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-9
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 2.12BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Geylang International
WLLDL
Season result split
35% W15% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-10
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 2.04Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Geylang International is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 1.3 goals / match - Geylang International

Geylang International is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

3 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 1.9 goals / match - Geylang International

Tanjong Pagar scoring profile: strong

Tanjong Pagar scores in 52% of matches (11 of 21 matches), while Geylang International keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

Geylang International scoring profile: very strong

Geylang International scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 21 matches).

17Goals scored (season)26
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
63Goals conceded (season)38
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
3.81Average goals in match3.2
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
4Goals scored (last 5)9
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
15Goals conceded (last 5)13
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

How often they score at least...

52%1 goal70%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
14%2 goals45%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
5%3 goals15%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
5%4 goals0%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal80%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
81%2 goals55%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
52%3 goals35%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
29%4 goals15%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
Geylang International - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 20 matches
50%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time35%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
0%BTTS in both halves15%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
5%Scored in both halves35%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
38%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
60%BTTS - last 580%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

95%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Geylang International is 203% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.38 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar · 1.15 pts / match - Geylang International

Tanjong Pagar - half-time state
5% leading24% draw71% trailing
Geylang International - half-time state
25% leading40% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.38Points per match (1st half)1.15
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.7
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
1.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.55
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
10%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
76%No goal before half-time45%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)0.95
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
1.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
2.14Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
24%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International
67%No goal after half-time50%
Tanjong PagarGeylang International

Tanjong Pagar - second-half results

14% W29% R57% P
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-25
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-21
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 10%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Geylang International - second-half results

20% W35% R45% P
23
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanjong Pagar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Geylang International - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match2.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanjong Pagar
ScoredConceded
0
9
0-15
2
7
16-30
3
14
31-45
2
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
5
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

Geylang International
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
10
16-30
7
6
31-45
2
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanjong Pagar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Geylang International

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).

Teams vs league

Tanjong PagarLigaGeylang International
Average goals in match 3.813.57 3.20
Both teams scored 52%50% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 86%73% 65%
Clean sheets 0%26% 20%
Goal before half-time 95%80% 80%
Goal after half-time 86%88% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.57
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.84
Away goals / match
+-6%
Home attack advantage
+-6%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Tanjong Pagar 0 - 0 - 2 Geylang International. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Geylang International
2 : 1
Tanjong Pagar
Geylang International
2 : 1
Tanjong Pagar

FAQ

What was the result of Tanjong Pagar vs Geylang International?

The S.League match finished Tanjong Pagar 1:3 Geylang International. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tanjong Pagar and Geylang International?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tanjong Pagar won 0, Geylang International won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanjong Pagar vs Geylang International?

Tanjong Pagar score 0.81 goals per game on average and Geylang International 1.30. The S.League average is 3.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Tanjong Pagar's matches and 55% of Geylang International's.

What form are Tanjong Pagar and Geylang International in?

Over the last 5 games Tanjong Pagar have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Geylang International 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanjong Pagar vs Geylang International?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tanjong Pagar vs Geylang International: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.