Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United: match statistics
Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tanjong Pagar played Hougang United in S.League (Singapore). The match was played on 18 May 2026. Venue: Jurong East Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Tanjong Pagar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Hougang United: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tanjong Pagar scores 0.75 and concedes 3.10 goals per match. Hougang United scores 1.25 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tanjong Pagar 50%, Hougang United 45%. Over 2.5: Tanjong Pagar 85%, Hougang United 70%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Hougang United has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.14. Tanjong Pagar: 9.5 shots per match, Hougang United: 10.4.
Match halves
Tanjong Pagar: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.50. Hougang United: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Tanjong Pagar: 61-75 (5 goals). Hougang United: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
S.League: 3.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (2) — the statistics clearly favor Hougang United. Hougang have scored 25 goals this season versus Tanjong Pagar’s 15 and show markedly better shooting efficiency on the road (17% vs 8%), translating to an average of 1.7 away goals per game versus the hosts’ 0.8 at home. Tanjong’s defense is highly prone to conceding — the home side concedes 3.0 goals per home match on average (62 conceded this season, 15 in the last 5), while Hougang concede 1.5 on the road (36 this season, 10 in the last 5); additionally, xG against is 2.37 for Tanjong vs 1.38 for Hougang. Form also favors the visitors: Tanjong have taken 0 points in their last 5 matches (5 losses) and fail to score in 60% of home games, whereas Hougang average 1.2 points over their last 5, have only 10% of away matches without a goal and 30% clean sheets. Considering the advantage in shooting efficiency (17% vs 8%), the xG edge (1.29 vs 1.13) and the hosts’ significantly weaker defense, I predict a clear favoritism for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics show Tanjong Pagar scores only 0.8 goals per match with xG 1.27, and in the last 5 matches they have scored a total of 2 goals (0.4 per match) and conceded 15 goals (3.0 per match), indicating serious offensive problems. Hougang United averages 1.7 goals scored and 1.5 conceded per match with xG 1.29 and a clearly better conversion rate of 17% (vs 8% for the home side), so the visitors are the more likely scorers. Seasonal BTTS rates are 30% for Tanjong and 60% for Hougang, while the league BTTS level is 49%, which gives mixed signals but highlights that the home side more often fails to score. Overall, accounting for Tanjong’s low efficiency (0.8 goals seasonally and 0.4 in the last 5) and Hougang’s strong scoring tendency, I assess BTTS probability at roughly 35% versus 65% for No BTTS. Therefore the best pick is 'No' — I expect at least one team (mainly Tanjong) not to find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model based on comparing attacking xG vs opponent defensive xG yields 1.33 xG for Tanjong Pagar (1.27 attacking xG vs 1.38 opponent defensive xG) and 1.48 for Hougang (1.29 vs 1.66), totaling 2.81 goals. This season the home side scores on average 0.8 and concedes 2.1 (15-62 on the season), while the visitors score 1.7 and concede 1.5 (25-36), indicating high susceptibility of the hosts to conceding. The last 5 matches confirm a high goal count: the hosts have seen 17 goals in 5 matches (3.4 per game), the visitors 16 goals in 5 matches (3.2), and the league averages 3.56 goals per match. Additionally, Hougang registers 4.6 shots on target with a 17% conversion rate versus 3.5 and 8% for the hosts, and seasonal over rates show over1.5=80% for the hosts and 100% for the visitors, and over2.5=60%/80%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (88% probability), while Over 2.5 is also strong (76%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hougang United are clear favorites: they have a 60% win rate this season versus Tanjong Pagar’s 20%, score on average 1.7 goals per game compared to the home side’s 0.8, and exhibit better shooting efficiency (17% vs 8%) and more shots on target (4.6 vs 3.5). In the last five matches Tanjong Pagar were leading at the break in 0% of games and were behind at half-time in 80% of cases, whereas Hougang led at the break in 40% of their last five matches and average 0.8 goals by half-time. The second half also favors the visitors: Hougang score on average 1.1 goals after the break, while the hosts concede on average 1.2 goals in that period, increasing the likelihood that the visitors will hold or extend a lead. The hosts’ xG is 1.27 versus 1.29 for the visitors, so quality is similar, but the difference in conversion and form (the hosts have five defeats in a row) supports maintaining Hougang’s advantage. For these reasons the most secure scenario is 2/2 (visitors leading at half-time and winning Full‑Time), although the X/2 outcome (draw at Half‑Time, visitors win Full‑Time) also has significant chances.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tanjong Pagar | Hougang United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hougang United is 67% better for: goals scored per match.
0.75 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 1.25 goals / match - Hougang United
Hougang United is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.
3.1 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 1.8 goals / match - Hougang United
Tanjong Pagar scores in 50% of matches (10 of 20 matches), while Hougang United keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
Hougang United scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanjong Pagar
Over / Under - Hougang United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hougang United is 229% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.35 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar · 1.15 pts / match - Hougang United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanjong Pagar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 5%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hougang United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -15 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tanjong Pagar
Hougang United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Tanjong Pagar | Liga | Hougang United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.85 | 3.58 | ▼ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 49% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 85% | 73% | ▼ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 27% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 85% | 88% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Tanjong Pagar 0 - 0 - 2 Hougang United. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United?
The S.League match finished Tanjong Pagar 2:1 Hougang United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tanjong Pagar and Hougang United?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tanjong Pagar won 0, Hougang United won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United?
Tanjong Pagar score 0.75 goals per game on average and Hougang United 1.25. The S.League average is 3.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tanjong Pagar's matches and 45% of Hougang United's.
What form are Tanjong Pagar and Hougang United in?
Over the last 5 games Tanjong Pagar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Hougang United 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United?
The statistical background for Tanjong Pagar vs Hougang United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


