Tanjong Pagar vs Tampines Rovers: match statistics
Tampines Rovers are the clear favorites in this matchup, sitting 2nd in the table with an impressive record of 9 wins and no away defeats. The visitors have won 83% of their away matches, scoring an average of 2.83 goals while conceding just 0.5 per game, and their away form features a five-game winning streak. Tanjong Pagar is in a dramatic situation in 7th place, losing 83% of their home matches and recording a run of five consecutive defeats. The hosts have conceded an average of 3.33 goals per home game while scoring just 1.17, failing to keep a single clean sheet. The class difference is massive - Tampines boasts a +14 away goal difference, whereas Tanjong Pagar sits at -13 at home, which, combined with the visitors' dominance in ball possession (56% vs 42%) and shot conversion, practically seals the outcome. All statistical indicators, from xG (2.04 vs 1.31) to form and efficiency, point to a convincing Tampines Rovers victory.
Tanjong Pagar vs Tampines Rovers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tanjong Pagar played Tampines Rovers in S.League (Singapore). The match was played on 16 March 2026. Final score: 0:4.
Current form
Tanjong Pagar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Tampines Rovers: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tanjong Pagar scores 1.00 and concedes 3.08 goals per match. Tampines Rovers scores 2.83 and concedes 0.75. League average: 3.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tanjong Pagar 62%, Tampines Rovers 58%. Over 2.5: Tanjong Pagar 85%, Tampines Rovers 83%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 74%.
xG, shots and style
Tampines Rovers has higher xG: 2.04 vs 1.25. Tanjong Pagar: 10.5 shots per match, Tampines Rovers: 16.8.
Match halves
Tanjong Pagar: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.69. Tampines Rovers: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 1.42.
Goals by minute
Tanjong Pagar: 61-75 (5 goals). Tampines Rovers: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
S.League: 3.67 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 74%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tampines Rovers are the clear favorites in this matchup, sitting 2nd in the table with an impressive record of 9 wins and no away defeats. The visitors have won 83% of their away matches, scoring an average of 2.83 goals while conceding just 0.5 per game, and their away form features a five-game winning streak. Tanjong Pagar is in a dramatic situation in 7th place, losing 83% of their home matches and recording a run of five consecutive defeats. The hosts have conceded an average of 3.33 goals per home game while scoring just 1.17, failing to keep a single clean sheet. The class difference is massive - Tampines boasts a +14 away goal difference, whereas Tanjong Pagar sits at -13 at home, which, combined with the visitors' dominance in ball possession (56% vs 42%) and shot conversion, practically seals the outcome. All statistical indicators, from xG (2.04 vs 1.31) to form and efficiency, point to a convincing Tampines Rovers victory.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tanjong Pagar | Tampines Rovers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tampines Rovers is 183% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 2.83 goals / match - Tampines Rovers
Tampines Rovers is 311% better for: goals conceded per match.
3.08 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 0.75 goals / match - Tampines Rovers
Tanjong Pagar scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Tampines Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 matches).
Tampines Rovers scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanjong Pagar
Over / Under - Tampines Rovers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tampines Rovers is 372% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.46 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar · 2.17 pts / match - Tampines Rovers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanjong Pagar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tampines Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -9 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tanjong Pagar
Tampines Rovers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Tanjong Pagar | Liga | Tampines Rovers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.08 | 3.67 | • 3.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 85% | 74% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 85% | 87% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Tanjong Pagar 0 - 0 - 2 Tampines Rovers. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanjong Pagar vs Tampines Rovers?
The S.League match finished Tanjong Pagar 0:4 Tampines Rovers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tanjong Pagar and Tampines Rovers?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tanjong Pagar won 0, Tampines Rovers won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanjong Pagar vs Tampines Rovers?
Tanjong Pagar score 1.00 goals per game on average and Tampines Rovers 2.83. The S.League average is 3.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Tanjong Pagar's matches and 58% of Tampines Rovers's.
What form are Tanjong Pagar and Tampines Rovers in?
Over the last 5 games Tanjong Pagar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Tampines Rovers 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanjong Pagar vs Tampines Rovers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.