Tanjong Pagar vs Young Lions: match statistics
Tanjong Pagar vs Young Lions: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tanjong Pagar played Young Lions in S.League (Singapore). The match was played on 10 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Tanjong Pagar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Young Lions: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tanjong Pagar scores 0.87 and concedes 3.13 goals per match. Young Lions scores 0.53 and concedes 2.93. League average: 3.61 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tanjong Pagar 53%, Young Lions 53%. Over 2.5: Tanjong Pagar 87%, Young Lions 47%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Tanjong Pagar has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.07. Tanjong Pagar: 9.5 shots per match, Young Lions: 8.4.
Match halves
Tanjong Pagar: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.60. Young Lions: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.07.
Goals by minute
Tanjong Pagar: 61-75 (5 goals). Young Lions: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
S.League: 3.61 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). At home they concede on average 3.38 goals per match versus Young Lions’ 3.83 conceded away, and the hosts have 1 win this season compared to 0 for the visitors. Both teams struggle to score: the hosts average 0.88 goals per home match, Young Lions 0.83 away, and each side has scored only 1 goal total in their last 5 matches. Young Lions produce slightly higher xG (1.19 vs 1.09) and are less likely to be shut out on the road (17% of away matches without a goal vs 63% for the hosts), indicating superior chance creation. In the last 5 fixtures the visitors have conceded 12 goals (2.4 per match) and the hosts 16 (3.2), so Tanjong Pagar’s home defense looks marginally better. Considering these figures and the fact the hosts have a 13% home win rate versus 0% away win rate for the visitors, I assess the probabilities as: home win 55%, draw 20%, away win 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis favors BTTS - Yes: Young Lions have a seasonal Both Teams To Score rate of 83% and average xG 1.19 away, while Tanjong Pagar at home have xG 0.99 but score only 0.33 goals per game, indicating low finishing. Both teams have recorded zero clean sheets (0%) and concede on average 2.33 (Tanjong Pagar) and 3.83 (Young Lions) goals per game; their xG against is 1.95 and 2.57 respectively, highlighting defensive vulnerability. Although BTTS for both sides has dropped to 20% in the last 5 matches and their goals per game in that period are only 0.2, Young Lions register more shots on target (3.67 vs 2.67) and have higher conversion (9% vs 4%), increasing the likelihood of a goal from them. Weighing these data points — Young Lions’ strong seasonal tendency (83%), high concession rates on both sides and league average BTTS 51% — I assign 68% for Yes and 32% for No; therefore I recommend a 'yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have 100% of matches this season with over 1.5 goals (Tanjong Pagar 100%, Young Lions 100%), which is the strongest signal in favor of Over 1.5. xG is 0.99 for the home side and 1.19 for the visitors (total 2.18), so xG alone suggests ~2.18 expected goals, but both defenses are clearly vulnerable. Tanjong Pagar concedes an average of 2.33 goals this season and as many as 3.2 goals in the last 5 matches (16 conceded), while Young Lions concede 3.83 this season and 2.4 in the last 5 (12 conceded), which increases the likelihood of further goals. The league averages 3.61 goals per match, and the teams register 8 and 9 shots with 2.67 and 3.67 on target respectively, despite low conversion rates of 4% and 9% — this indicates a lot of created chances. Based on this, I recommend backing the Over at 1.5 as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~60%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (~35%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Young Lions victory at full-time (X/2) — I assign this scenario a 36% probability. I expect a draw at the break because neither team has recorded leads at half-time in their stats (0% leads), and the home side have been level at the interval in 67% of matches. Young Lions, however, hold the offensive edge: xG 1.19 versus 0.99, an average of 0.83 goals scored per game compared to Tanjong Pagar’s 0.33, higher shot conversion 9% vs 4% and more shots on target (3.67 vs 2.67), which gives them a better chance of a turnaround after the break. Additionally, more goals are scored in second halves (second-half average 2.17 for the visitors vs 1.33 for the hosts) and Young Lions’ matches finish with both teams scoring in 83% of cases, so I expect goals after the break and an advantage for the visitors in the final result. Form supports caution: the hosts have lost 5 of their last 5 matches, the visitors have 4 losses and 1 draw in their last 5, and the hosts have not won this season (0% wins); therefore X/2 is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tanjong Pagar | Young Lions | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tanjong Pagar is 64% better for: goals scored per match.
0.87 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 0.53 goals / match - Young Lions
Young Lions is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
3.13 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar · 2.93 goals / match - Young Lions
Tanjong Pagar scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while Young Lions keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 15 matches).
Young Lions scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanjong Pagar
Over / Under - Young Lions
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Young Lions is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.4 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar · 0.53 pts / match - Young Lions
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanjong Pagar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Young Lions - second-half results
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -9 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tanjong Pagar
Young Lions
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Tanjong Pagar | Liga | Young Lions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 3.61 | ▼ 3.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 87% | 73% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▼ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 87% | 86% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Tanjong Pagar 1 - 1 - 0 Young Lions. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanjong Pagar vs Young Lions?
The S.League match finished Tanjong Pagar 0:1 Young Lions. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tanjong Pagar and Young Lions?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tanjong Pagar won 1, Young Lions won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanjong Pagar vs Young Lions?
Tanjong Pagar score 0.87 goals per game on average and Young Lions 0.53. The S.League average is 3.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Tanjong Pagar's matches and 53% of Young Lions's.
What form are Tanjong Pagar and Young Lions in?
Over the last 5 games Tanjong Pagar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Young Lions 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanjong Pagar vs Young Lions?
The statistical background for Tanjong Pagar vs Young Lions — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


