Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad: match statistics
Abu Qair Semad occupies 3rd place in the table and presents significantly better form than Tanta SC (15th position). The guests have an impressive record of 50% wins on away grounds and a positive goal difference (+4), while the hosts have won just 11% of matches at home with a negative balance of -3. Abu Qair Semad averages 4.63 shots on target per away match with a conversion of 16%, which is twice as good as Tanta SC (2.71 shots on target, 8% conversion). The hosts fail to score in 33% of home matches, which, combined with the guests' solid defense (average 1 goal conceded away, 30% clean sheets), puts them in a disadvantageous position. xG statistics also favor Abu Qair Semad (1.37 vs 1.07), confirming their qualitative advantage. Taking all factors into account, the guests are the clear favorite in this meeting.
Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tanta SC played Abu Qair Semad in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 22 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Tanta SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Abu Qair Semad: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tanta SC scores 0.63 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Abu Qair Semad scores 1.26 and concedes 0.79. League average: 1.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tanta SC 47%, Abu Qair Semad 42%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 16%, Abu Qair Semad 37%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 31%.
xG, shots and style
Abu Qair Semad has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.16. Tanta SC: 6.7 shots per match, Abu Qair Semad: 7.1.
Match halves
Tanta SC: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.21. Abu Qair Semad: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Tanta SC: 16-30 (4 goals). Abu Qair Semad: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.91 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 31%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Abu Qair Semad occupies 3rd place in the table and presents significantly better form than Tanta SC (15th position). The guests have an impressive record of 50% wins on away grounds and a positive goal difference (+4), while the hosts have won just 11% of matches at home with a negative balance of -3. Abu Qair Semad averages 4.63 shots on target per away match with a conversion of 16%, which is twice as good as Tanta SC (2.71 shots on target, 8% conversion). The hosts fail to score in 33% of home matches, which, combined with the guests' solid defense (average 1 goal conceded away, 30% clean sheets), puts them in a disadvantageous position. xG statistics also favor Abu Qair Semad (1.37 vs 1.07), confirming their qualitative advantage. Taking all factors into account, the guests are the clear favorite in this meeting.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tanta SC | Abu Qair Semad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Abu Qair Semad is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Tanta SC · 1.6 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Abu Qair Semad is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
0.63 goals / match - Tanta SC · 1.26 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad
Abu Qair Semad is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.95 goals / match - Tanta SC · 0.79 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad
Tanta SC scores in 53% of matches (10 of 19 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).
Abu Qair Semad scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanta SC
Over / Under - Abu Qair Semad
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanta SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Abu Qair Semad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tanta SC
Abu Qair Semad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tanta SC | Liga | Abu Qair Semad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.58 | 1.91 | ▲ 2.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 40% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 16% | 31% | ▲ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 26% | 38% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 58% | 69% | • 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tanta SC 0 - 0 - 1 Abu Qair Semad. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?
The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 1:1 Abu Qair Semad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?
Tanta SC score 0.63 goals per game on average and Abu Qair Semad 1.26. The Second Division average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Tanta SC's matches and 42% of Abu Qair Semad's.
What form are Tanta SC and Abu Qair Semad in?
Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Abu Qair Semad 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tanta SC vs Abu Qair Semad: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.