Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood: match statistics
Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tanta SC played Haras El Hodood in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 2 October 2026. Venue: Tanta Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Tanta SC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Haras El Hodood: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tanta SC scores 0.67 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Haras El Hodood scores 1.33 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tanta SC 33%, Haras El Hodood 33%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 33%, Haras El Hodood 33%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.15. Tanta SC: 7.8 shots per match, Haras El Hodood: 11.3.
Match halves
Tanta SC: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33. Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Tanta SC: 31-45+ (2 goals). Haras El Hodood: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.14 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haras El Hodood are 2nd and remain unbeaten after 6 matches, while Tanta SC are 9th with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses. The visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 win for the hosts; over that period, they scored 6 and 2 goals respectively. Away from home, Haras average 1.33 goals scored and 0.33 conceded, compared with Tanta’s home averages of 1 goal scored and 0.67 conceded. The visitors’ advantage is also reflected in chance quality: their away xG stands at 1.48, with 1.04 xG conceded, while Tanta’s home figures are 1.21 and 1.47. Both teams have won 2 of their respective 3 away and home matches, so a draw remains a realistic possibility, but the visitors’ stronger defensive record and recent form make them the more compelling pick.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams kept a clean sheet in 67% of their matches under the conditions analysed, while matches with goals from both sides account for just 33% for each team, compared with 45% league-wide. Tanta have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4, while Haras El Hodood have conceded an average of 0.4 goals over the same period. The quality of chances also points to a difficult task for the hosts: their recent average xG is 0.87, while their opponents have allowed chances worth an average of 0.99 xG. The visitors have a higher recent attacking xG, at 1.35 compared with Tanta’s 0.87, so they may score—but that does not necessarily mean both teams will find the net. The strongest signal, therefore, is that at least one team will fail to score (BTTS - No); this does not automatically mean a 0-0 scoreline.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: none of the teams’ matches so far this season have gone over this line, although the sample size is small. In their last five matches, Tanta scored an average of just 0.4 goals, while Haras conceded 0.4, limiting expectations for the hosts. The visitors look more threatening in attack, with an average xG of 1.48 compared with Tanta’s 1.12, but both teams have conceded an average of 0.33 goals per match this season. The projected total of 1.94 goals is also close to the league average of 2.02, so despite the visitors’ attacking advantage, four goals look unlikely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as it occurred in 4 of Haras El Hodood’s last 5 matches and 3 of Tanta SC’s 5 fixtures. The visitors should gain the upper hand after the break: over their last 5 matches, they averaged 0.8 goals in the second half, while the hosts failed to score in that period. The visitors’ current form also points to an away win: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 for Tanta, averaging 1.2 goals against the hosts’ 0.4. Haras El Hodood also create more chances, posting an average xG of 1.48 compared with their opponents’ 1.12 and recording 5 shots on target per match against 3.67. With half-time draws occurring so frequently and a clear gap in recent results, the HT/FT scenario of a draw at the break followed by an away win at full-time has the strongest support in the data.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tanta SC | Haras El Hodood | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Haras El Hodood is 120% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Tanta SC · 2.2 pts / match - Haras El Hodood
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haras El Hodood is 99% better for: goals scored per match.
0.67 goals / match - Tanta SC · 1.33 goals / match - Haras El Hodood
Haras El Hodood is 152% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Tanta SC · 0.33 goals / match - Haras El Hodood
Tanta SC scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).
Haras El Hodood scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanta SC
Over / Under - Haras El Hodood
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haras El Hodood is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Tanta SC · 1.67 pts / match - Haras El Hodood
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanta SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Haras El Hodood - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tanta SC
Haras El Hodood
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tanta SC | Liga | Haras El Hodood | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.50 | 2.14 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 45% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 36% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 34% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 33% | 75% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?
The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 0:2 Haras El Hodood. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?
Tanta SC score 0.67 goals per game on average and Haras El Hodood 1.33. The Second Division average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tanta SC's matches and 33% of Haras El Hodood's.
What form are Tanta SC and Haras El Hodood in?
Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Haras El Hodood 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


