Egypt - Second DivisionTanta StadiumData current as of 04 October 2026

Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood: match statistics

Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Haras El Hodood crest
Haras El Hodood

Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanta SC played Haras El Hodood in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 2 October 2026. Venue: Tanta Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Tanta SC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Haras El Hodood: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanta SC scores 0.67 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Haras El Hodood scores 1.33 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.14 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanta SC 33%, Haras El Hodood 33%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 33%, Haras El Hodood 33%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.15. Tanta SC: 7.8 shots per match, Haras El Hodood: 11.3.

Match halves

Tanta SC: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33. Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Tanta SC: 31-45+ (2 goals). Haras El Hodood: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.14 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Haras El Hodood are 2nd and remain unbeaten after 6 matches, while Tanta SC are 9th with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses. The visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 win for the hosts; over that period, they scored 6 and 2 goals respectively. Away from home, Haras average 1.33 goals scored and 0.33 conceded, compared with Tanta’s home averages of 1 goal scored and 0.67 conceded. The visitors’ advantage is also reflected in chance quality: their away xG stands at 1.48, with 1.04 xG conceded, while Tanta’s home figures are 1.21 and 1.47. Both teams have won 2 of their respective 3 away and home matches, so a draw remains a realistic possibility, but the visitors’ stronger defensive record and recent form make them the more compelling pick.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams kept a clean sheet in 67% of their matches under the conditions analysed, while matches with goals from both sides account for just 33% for each team, compared with 45% league-wide. Tanta have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4, while Haras El Hodood have conceded an average of 0.4 goals over the same period. The quality of chances also points to a difficult task for the hosts: their recent average xG is 0.87, while their opponents have allowed chances worth an average of 0.99 xG. The visitors have a higher recent attacking xG, at 1.35 compared with Tanta’s 0.87, so they may score—but that does not necessarily mean both teams will find the net. The strongest signal, therefore, is that at least one team will fail to score (BTTS - No); this does not automatically mean a 0-0 scoreline.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: none of the teams’ matches so far this season have gone over this line, although the sample size is small. In their last five matches, Tanta scored an average of just 0.4 goals, while Haras conceded 0.4, limiting expectations for the hosts. The visitors look more threatening in attack, with an average xG of 1.48 compared with Tanta’s 1.12, but both teams have conceded an average of 0.33 goals per match this season. The projected total of 1.94 goals is also close to the league average of 2.02, so despite the visitors’ attacking advantage, four goals look unlikely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as it occurred in 4 of Haras El Hodood’s last 5 matches and 3 of Tanta SC’s 5 fixtures. The visitors should gain the upper hand after the break: over their last 5 matches, they averaged 0.8 goals in the second half, while the hosts failed to score in that period. The visitors’ current form also points to an away win: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 for Tanta, averaging 1.2 goals against the hosts’ 0.4. Haras El Hodood also create more chances, posting an average xG of 1.48 compared with their opponents’ 1.12 and recording 5 shots on target per match against 3.67. With half-time draws occurring so frequently and a clear gap in recent results, the HT/FT scenario of a draw at the break followed by an away win at full-time has the strongest support in the data.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
5Shots10
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0Shots on target3
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0xG0
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
8Corners8
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0Dangerous attacks0
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
-1Fouls-1
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
-1Cards-1
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.67Goals scored / match1.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.83Goals conceded / match0.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
49%Average possession50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
3.17Shots on target / match4.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.83Shots per match11.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
3.17Shots on target4.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
8.5%Shot conversion11.8%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
49%Possession50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
1.15xG for1.3
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
1.34xG against1.12
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Shooting quality

Tanta SC: BalancedHaras El Hodood: Balanced
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haras El Hodood is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Tanta SC · 2.2 pts / match - Haras El Hodood

Tanta SC
DLLWD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Haras El Hodood
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 away
2-1-0
DWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haras El Hodood is 99% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - Tanta SC · 1.33 goals / match - Haras El Hodood

Haras El Hodood is 152% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Tanta SC · 0.33 goals / match - Haras El Hodood

Tanta SC scoring profile: more difficult

Tanta SC scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

Haras El Hodood scoring profile: mixed

Haras El Hodood scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

4Goals scored (season)8
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
5Goals conceded (season)2
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
1.5Average goals in match1.67
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
2Goals scored (last 5)6
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal67%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
17%2 goals67%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%3 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal33%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
17%2 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
17%3 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%Scored in both halves50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
20%BTTS - last 540%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haras El Hodood is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Tanta SC · 1.67 pts / match - Haras El Hodood

Tanta SC - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Haras El Hodood - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.67
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.67
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
50%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
67%No goal before half-time50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)2.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
83%Clean sheet after half-time83%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
83%No goal after half-time33%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Tanta SC - second-half results

17% W67% D17% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Haras El Hodood - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tanta SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.80.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Haras El Hodood - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Haras El Hodood
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
74%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Haras El Hodood

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
27%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Tanta SCLigaHaras El Hodood
Average goals in match▼ 1.502.14▼ 1.67
Both teams scored▼ 33%45%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%36%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 50%34%▲ 67%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%58%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 33%75%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.14
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
16%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Haras El HodoodGoalAhmed Nayel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?

The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 0:2 Haras El Hodood. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?

Tanta SC score 0.67 goals per game on average and Haras El Hodood 1.33. The Second Division average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tanta SC's matches and 33% of Haras El Hodood's.

What form are Tanta SC and Haras El Hodood in?

Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Haras El Hodood 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.