Egypt - Second DivisionTanta StadiumData current as of 18 September 2026

Tanta SC vs Nasr: match statistics

Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Nasr crest
Nasr

Tanta SC vs Nasr: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanta SC played Nasr in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 17 September 2026. Venue: Tanta Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Tanta SC: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Nasr: 1-3-0, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanta SC scores 0.75 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Nasr scores 1.00 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanta SC 50%, Nasr 50%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 50%, Nasr 0%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Tanta SC has higher xG: 1.15 vs 1.14. Tanta SC: 8.8 shots per match, Nasr: 7.0.

Match halves

Tanta SC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Nasr: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Tanta SC: 31-45+ (1 goals). Nasr: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nasr sit 8th, four places above 12th-placed Tanta SC, and remain unbeaten this season with 1 win and 3 draws. The visitors create more chances away from home: their average xG stands at 1.49 compared with Tanta SC’s 1.21, while they also average 11 shots and 7 on target, against 8.5 and 4 for the hosts. Tanta SC do, however, have home advantage, having won 1 of their 2 home matches, while both of Nasr’s away games ended in draws. Both teams score and concede an average of 1 goal per match at home or away, while the hosts have failed to score in 50% of their home appearances. Nasr’s edge in chance creation reduces the risk of an away defeat, but their tendency to draw and low away efficiency point primarily towards a share of the points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The “No” selection has a slight edge, as the league’s average BTTS rate is only 45%, while matches produce an average of 2.0 goals per game. Tanta have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches, conceding just 0.83 xG to opponents, which is a significant obstacle for Nasr. The hosts themselves create only 0.79 xG and have averaged 0.8 goals scored over their last five matches, so their finding the net is far from certain as well. Nasr register more shots on target, 7.0 compared with Tanta’s 4.5, and have a higher attacking xG of 1.49, but their recent average of goals scored is also 0.8. BTTS has landed in 60% of Tanta’s and 40% of Nasr’s last five matches, but the hosts’ defensive profile and both sides’ low scoring efficiency provide stronger support for a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, both teams averaged 0.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, pointing to games hovering around 2.0 total goals. Tanta’s average xG stands at 1.06 and Nasr’s at 1.16, while their opponents allowed 1.33 and 1.28 xG respectively, meaning the projected total of 2.12 goals does not suggest an open game. In the current data for both teams, all matches finished with Under 2.5 and Under 3.5 goals, although the sample size is limited. The 2.5-goal line was also exceeded in only 40% of Tanta’s and 20% of Nasr’s last five matches. The strongest option is Under 3.5, as even with a slight increase in finishing efficiency, the margin to four goals remains significant.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as Tanta have been level at the break in 100% of their home matches so far, while both teams have recorded a 60% draw rate after 45 minutes across their last five games. Nasr have failed to score before half-time in each of their last five matches, conceding an average of 0.8 goals in that period, which points to a cautious opening. However, the visitors are more dangerous creatively, posting an xG of 1.49 compared with Tanta’s 0.79 and averaging 7 shots on target to Tanta’s 4.5, meaning a draw followed by a late Nasr goal remains a significant possibility. Tanta have defended very solidly at home, have yet to concede and have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches, while Nasr have drawn all of their away fixtures so far. The league’s low average of 2.0 goals, together with the greater second-half scoring tendency—with over 0.5 goals scored in 78% of matches—suggests a balanced game more likely to be decided after the break than before it.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Tanta SCNasr
12Shots8
Tanta SCNasr
4Shots on target4
Tanta SCNasr
0xG0
Tanta SCNasr
5Corners4
Tanta SCNasr
0Dangerous attacks0
Tanta SCNasr
-1Fouls-1
Tanta SCNasr
-1Cards-1
Tanta SCNasr

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.75Goals scored / match1
Tanta SCNasr
1.25Goals conceded / match0.5
Tanta SCNasr
50%Average possession41%
Tanta SCNasr
3.75Shots on target / match3.75
Tanta SCNasr

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.75Shots per match7
Tanta SCNasr
3.75Shots on target3.75
Tanta SCNasr
8.6%Shot conversion14.3%
Tanta SCNasr
50%Possession41%
Tanta SCNasr
1.15xG for1.14
Tanta SCNasr
1.34xG against0.99
Tanta SCNasr

Shooting quality

Tanta SC: BalancedNasr: Counter-attacking
Tanta SCNasr
Accuracy (shots on target)43%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nasr is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Tanta SC · 1.5 pts / match - Nasr

Tanta SC
WDLL
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Nasr
DDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W75% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-0
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-0
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nasr is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

0.75 goals / match - Tanta SC · 1 goals / match - Nasr

Nasr is 150% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Tanta SC · 0.5 goals / match - Nasr

Tanta SC scoring profile: mixed

Tanta SC scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Nasr keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Nasr scoring profile: very strong

Nasr scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

3Goals scored (season)4
Tanta SCNasr
5Goals conceded (season)2
Tanta SCNasr
2Average goals in match1.5
Tanta SCNasr
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Tanta SCNasr
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
Tanta SCNasr

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal75%
Tanta SCNasr
25%2 goals25%
Tanta SCNasr
0%3 goals0%
Tanta SCNasr
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCNasr

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal50%
Tanta SCNasr
25%2 goals0%
Tanta SCNasr
25%3 goals0%
Tanta SCNasr
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCNasr

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
Tanta SCNasr
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanta SCNasr
0%Scored in both halves0%
Tanta SCNasr

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Tanta SCNasr
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Tanta SCNasr
50%BTTS - last 550%
Tanta SCNasr

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time25%
Tanta SCNasr
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Tanta SCNasr
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tanta SCNasr

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Tanta SCNasr
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Tanta SCNasr
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Tanta SCNasr

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nasr is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Tanta SC · 0.75 pts / match - Nasr

Tanta SC - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Nasr - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)0.75
Tanta SCNasr
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0
Tanta SCNasr
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Tanta SCNasr
1Average goals (1st half)0.25
Tanta SCNasr
25%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Tanta SCNasr
75%No goal before half-time100%
Tanta SCNasr

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)2
Tanta SCNasr
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
Tanta SCNasr
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
Tanta SCNasr
1Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Tanta SCNasr
75%Clean sheet after half-time75%
Tanta SCNasr
75%No goal after half-time25%
Tanta SCNasr

Tanta SC - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nasr - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tanta SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.25
Goals scored / match0.30.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal75%50%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet25%75%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nasr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.752.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.31.3
1 goal25%75%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet75%75%
No goal100%25%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 75% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Nasr
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
167%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Nasr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
40%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
75% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
75%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Tanta SCLigaNasr
Average goals in match 2.002.00 1.50
Both teams scored 50%45% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%35% 0%
Clean sheets 25%35% 50%
Goal before half-time 75%55% 25%
Goal after half-time 50%78% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.75
Away goals / match
+67%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Tanta SC vs Nasr?

The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 1:0 Nasr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Nasr?

Tanta SC score 0.75 goals per game on average and Nasr 1.00. The Second Division average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tanta SC's matches and 50% of Nasr's.

What form are Tanta SC and Nasr in?

Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Nasr 1-3-0 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Nasr?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.