Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 16 October 2026

Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah: match statistics

Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Olympic El Qanah crest
Olympic El Qanah
115%(4.91)
X20%(3.20)
265%(1.71)

Olympic El Qanah is the decisive favorite for this encounter, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 15 wins, 7 draws, and only 1 defeat. The visitors present phenomenal away form with a 75% win rate and just 0.08 goals conceded on average per away match, resulting in 92% clean sheets. Tanta SC sits in the relegation zone in 17th position, with only 9% of home matches won and a negative goal difference (-5) in home games. The form of the last five matches unequivocally favors the visitors (2.6 points per game vs 0.8 for the hosts), and the difference in offensive (1.42 vs 0.73 goals per game) and defensive quality is immense. Olympic El Qanah's advantage in xG statistics, shot conversion, and consistency in gaining points makes an away victory the most probable scenario.

Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanta SC played Olympic El Qanah in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 26 February 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Tanta SC: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Olympic El Qanah: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanta SC scores 0.65 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Olympic El Qanah scores 1.57 and concedes 0.43. League average: 1.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanta SC 52%, Olympic El Qanah 35%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 17%, Olympic El Qanah 30%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Olympic El Qanah has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.23. Tanta SC: 7.1 shots per match, Olympic El Qanah: 10.0.

Match halves

Tanta SC: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.26. Olympic El Qanah: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

Tanta SC: 16-30 (5 goals). Olympic El Qanah: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.85 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Olympic El Qanah is the decisive favorite for this encounter, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 15 wins, 7 draws, and only 1 defeat. The visitors present phenomenal away form with a 75% win rate and just 0.08 goals conceded on average per away match, resulting in 92% clean sheets. Tanta SC sits in the relegation zone in 17th position, with only 9% of home matches won and a negative goal difference (-5) in home games. The form of the last five matches unequivocally favors the visitors (2.6 points per game vs 0.8 for the hosts), and the difference in offensive (1.42 vs 0.73 goals per game) and defensive quality is immense. Olympic El Qanah's advantage in xG statistics, shot conversion, and consistency in gaining points makes an away victory the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
8Shots8
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
5Shots on target3
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1.26xG0.95
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
12Corners6
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
55Dangerous attacks32
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
16Fouls17
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0Cards0
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.65Goals scored / match1.57
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1Goals conceded / match0.43
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
45%Average possession44%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
3.04Shots on target / match4.22
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.13Shots per match10
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
3.04Shots on target4.22
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
9.1%Shot conversion15.7%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
45%Possession44%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1.23xG for1.5
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1.32xG against1.23
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Shooting quality

Tanta SC: BalancedOlympic El Qanah: Counter-attacking
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
Accuracy (shots on target)43%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Olympic El Qanah is 225% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Tanta SC · 2.6 pts / match - Olympic El Qanah

Tanta SC
DDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
9% W57% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-13-8
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Olympic El Qanah
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
65% W30% D4% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-7-1
2.26 pts / match · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Olympic El Qanah is 142% better for: goals scored per match.

0.65 goals / match - Tanta SC · 1.57 goals / match - Olympic El Qanah

Olympic El Qanah is 133% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Tanta SC · 0.43 goals / match - Olympic El Qanah

Tanta SC scoring profile: more difficult

Tanta SC scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Olympic El Qanah keeps a clean sheet in 61% (14 of 23 matches).

Olympic El Qanah scoring profile: very strong

Olympic El Qanah scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

15Goals scored (season)36
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
23Goals conceded (season)10
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
1.65Average goals in match2
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
6Goals conceded (last 5)0
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal87%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%2 goals48%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%3 goals17%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%4 goals4%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal39%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
22%2 goals4%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%3 goals0%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time9%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%Scored in both halves26%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
80%BTTS - last 50%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Olympic El Qanah is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - Tanta SC · 1.78 pts / match - Olympic El Qanah

Tanta SC - half-time state
17% leading65% draw17% trailing
Olympic El Qanah - half-time state
43% leading48% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.78
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.74Average goals (1st half)0.78
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
65%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
65%No goal before half-time52%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

After half-time (2nd half)

0.87Points per match (2nd half)1.96
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.26Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.26
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
0.91Average goals (2nd half)1.22
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
52%Clean sheet after half-time78%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah
74%No goal after half-time35%
Tanta SCOlympic El Qanah

Tanta SC - second-half results

13% W48% D39% L
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding53%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Olympic El Qanah - second-half results

57% W26% D17% L
41
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tanta SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Olympic El Qanah - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Olympic El Qanah
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
7
3
31-45
5
3
46-60
5
0
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Olympic El Qanah

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.80
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
173%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Tanta SCLigaOlympic El Qanah
Average goals in match▼ 1.651.85▲ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 52%40%▼ 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%29%• 30%
Clean sheets▼ 26%39%▲ 61%
Goal before half-time• 52%51%▲ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 61%66%▲ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.85
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.93
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Olympic El QanahGoalMostafa Hamada Abdel Kader

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tanta SC 0 - 1 - 0 Olympic El Qanah. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Olympic El Qanah
1 : 1
Tanta SC

FAQ

What was the result of Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah?

The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 0:1 Olympic El Qanah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah?

Tanta SC score 0.65 goals per game on average and Olympic El Qanah 1.57. The Second Division average is 1.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Tanta SC's matches and 35% of Olympic El Qanah's.

What form are Tanta SC and Olympic El Qanah in?

Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Olympic El Qanah 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah?

The statistical background for Tanta SC vs Olympic El Qanah — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.