Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 07 September 2026

Tanzania Prisons vs Azam: match statistics

Tanzania Prisons crest
Tanzania Prisons
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Azam crest
Azam
125%(6.66)
X30%(4.97)
245%(1.32)

Azam presents significantly better form and statistics in away matches. The visiting team remains unbeaten away this season (0 losses), with a record of 5 victories and 5 draws, along with an impressive goal difference of +12 throughout the season. Tanzania Prisons occupies a weak 14th position in the table, with only 29% of matches won at home and a worrying indicator of 57% of matches without scoring a goal at their own stadium. Azam dominates possession (54% vs 47%) and has better scoring statistics (1.5 goals per away match vs 0.71 for the hosts). The form of the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (2.0 points per match vs 0.8 for the hosts). Considering all these factors, an Azam victory is the most probable result, although the visitors' solid percentage of draws away (75%) suggests that a draw is also a realistic option.

Tanzania Prisons vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanzania Prisons played Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 5 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Tanzania Prisons: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Azam: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanzania Prisons scores 0.57 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Azam scores 1.60 and concedes 0.40. League average: 1.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanzania Prisons 21%, Azam 30%. Over 2.5: Tanzania Prisons 21%, Azam 30%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.11. Tanzania Prisons: 4.6 shots per match, Azam: 9.6.

Match halves

Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.36. Azam: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Tanzania Prisons: 61-75 (3 goals). Azam: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.91 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Azam presents significantly better form and statistics in away matches. The visiting team remains unbeaten away this season (0 losses), with a record of 5 victories and 5 draws, along with an impressive goal difference of +12 throughout the season. Tanzania Prisons occupies a weak 14th position in the table, with only 29% of matches won at home and a worrying indicator of 57% of matches without scoring a goal at their own stadium. Azam dominates possession (54% vs 47%) and has better scoring statistics (1.5 goals per away match vs 0.71 for the hosts). The form of the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (2.0 points per match vs 0.8 for the hosts). Considering all these factors, an Azam victory is the most probable result, although the visitors' solid percentage of draws away (75%) suggests that a draw is also a realistic option.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
2Shots3
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1Shots on target0
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.67xG0.86
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0Corners7
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
65Dangerous attacks93
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
-1Fouls-1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
-1Cards-1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.57Goals scored / match1.6
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.07Goals conceded / match0.4
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
37%Average possession51%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.57Shots on target / match3.2
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.64Shots per match9.6
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.57Shots on target3.2
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
12.3%Shot conversion16.7%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
37%Possession51%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.11xG for1.52
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.15xG against0.84
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Shooting quality

Tanzania Prisons: Counter-attackingAzam: Efficient finishing
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam is 175% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 2.2 pts / match - Azam

Tanzania Prisons
LDLWL
Season result split
21% W21% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-8
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.83Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Azam
WDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-0
Last 5 away
1-3-0
DDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 0.86BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 181% better for: goals scored per match.

0.57 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 1.6 goals / match - Azam

Azam is 167% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons · 0.4 goals / match - Azam

Tanzania Prisons scoring profile: more difficult

Tanzania Prisons scores in 36% of matches (5 of 14 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 70% (7 of 10 matches).

Azam scoring profile: strong

Azam scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

8Goals scored (season)16
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
15Goals conceded (season)4
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
1.64Average goals in match2
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
5Goals scored (last 5)10
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
10Goals conceded (last 5)2
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

How often they score at least...

36%1 goal80%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
14%2 goals60%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
7%3 goals20%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0%4 goals0%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal30%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
29%2 goals10%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
7%3 goals0%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
7%4 goals0%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

31%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0%Scored in both halves30%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
60%BTTS - last 520%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

2nd half

43%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 166% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons · 2.1 pts / match - Azam

Tanzania Prisons - half-time state
7% leading57% draw36% trailing
Azam - half-time state
60% leading30% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per match (1st half)2.1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.21Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.86Average goals (1st half)1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
57%Clean sheet before half-time90%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
79%No goal before half-time40%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.8
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.3
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
0.71Average goals (2nd half)1
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
71%Clean sheet after half-time70%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam
86%No goal after half-time50%
Tanzania PrisonsAzam

Tanzania Prisons - second-half results

14% W57% R29% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Azam - second-half results

50% W30% R20% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanzania Prisons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanzania Prisons
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
6
31-45
1
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Azam
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
1
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
26%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanzania Prisons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
155%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
232%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
33%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Tanzania PrisonsLigaAzam
Average goals in match 1.641.91 2.00
Both teams scored 21%31% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 21%29% 30%
Clean sheets 36%42% 70%
Goal before half-time 50%51% 70%
Goal after half-time 43%58% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.91
Average goals per match
31%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+77%
Home attack advantage
+43%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Tanzania Prisons vs Azam?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Tanzania Prisons 0:0 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanzania Prisons vs Azam?

Tanzania Prisons score 0.57 goals per game on average and Azam 1.60. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 21% of Tanzania Prisons's matches and 30% of Azam's.

What form are Tanzania Prisons and Azam in?

Over the last 5 games Tanzania Prisons have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Azam 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanzania Prisons vs Azam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.