Team Altamura vs Audace Cerignola: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Team Altamura played Audace Cerignola in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 14 December 2025. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Team Altamura: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Audace Cerignola: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Team Altamura scores 0.94 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Audace Cerignola scores 1.24 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Team Altamura 59%, Audace Cerignola 53%. Over 2.5: Team Altamura 47%, Audace Cerignola 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Audace Cerignola has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.02. Team Altamura: 7.9 shots per match, Audace Cerignola: 13.1.

Match halves

Team Altamura: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.53. Audace Cerignola: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Team Altamura: 76-90+ (5 goals). Audace Cerignola: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group C: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
9Shots12
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
4Shots on target1
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
1.34xG1.24
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
2Corners4
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
68Dangerous attacks57
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
15Fouls8
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
2Cards2
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
0.94Goals scored / match1.24
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
1.47Goals conceded / match1.35
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
47%Average possession49%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
2.24Shots on target / match4.47
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.88Shots per match13.06
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
2.24Shots on target4.47
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
11.9%Shot conversion9.5%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
47%Possession49%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
1.02xG for1.54
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
1.41xG against1.27
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

Shooting quality

Team Altamura: BalancedAudace Cerignola: Balanced
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
Accuracy (shots on target)28%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Audace Cerignola is 225% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Team Altamura · 2.6 pts / match - Audace Cerignola

Team Altamura
LLDLW
Season result split
24% W41% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-6
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Audace Cerignola
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
35% W29% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-6
1.35 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Audace Cerignola is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Team Altamura · 1.24 goals / match - Audace Cerignola

Audace Cerignola is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Team Altamura · 1.35 goals / match - Audace Cerignola

Team Altamura scoring profile: strong

Team Altamura scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Audace Cerignola keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

Audace Cerignola scoring profile: very strong

Audace Cerignola scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Team Altamura keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

16Goals scored (season)21
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
25Goals conceded (season)23
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
2.41Average goals in match2.59
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
18%2 goals41%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
6%3 goals12%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
0%4 goals0%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal65%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
41%2 goals47%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
18%3 goals18%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
12%4 goals6%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time24%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
6%Scored in both halves24%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
60%BTTS - last 540%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Team Altamura is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.12 pts / match - Team Altamura · 1.06 pts / match - Audace Cerignola

Team Altamura - half-time state
24% leading41% draw35% trailing
Audace Cerignola - half-time state
18% leading53% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.12Points per match (1st half)1.06
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
1.12Average goals (1st half)0.94
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
65%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
71%No goal before half-time59%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.35
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
41%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola
53%No goal after half-time47%
Team AltamuraAudace Cerignola

Team Altamura - second-half results

29% W29% D41% L
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Audace Cerignola - second-half results

35% W29% D35% L
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Team Altamura - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Audace Cerignola - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Team Altamura
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
3
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Audace Cerignola
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
4
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Team Altamura

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Audace Cerignola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

Team AltamuraLigaAudace Cerignola
Average goals in match 2.412.60 2.59
Both teams scored 59%53% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%51% 53%
Clean sheets 24%27% 35%
Goal before half-time 59%68% 59%
Goal after half-time 88%80% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Audace CerignolaGoalLudovico D'Orazio
  2. Audace CerignolaYellow cardLorenzo Paolucci
  3. Audace CerignolaSubstitutionOn: Stefano GrecoOff: Velizar-Iliasv Svetozarov Iliev
  4. Team AltamuraSubstitutionOn: Alessio CurcioOff: Fabrizio Poli
  5. Team AltamuraGoalChec Doumbia
  6. Team AltamuraSubstitutionOn: Giuseppe SimoneOff: David Suazo
  7. Audace CerignolaYellow cardAndrea Gasbarro
  8. Team AltamuraYellow cardTobia Mogentale
  9. Team AltamuraSubstitutionOn: Vittorio Alberto AgostinelliOff: Mattia Florio
  10. Team AltamuraSubstitutionOn: Mattia EspositoOff: Lorenzo Peschetola
  11. Team AltamuraYellow cardTobia Mogentale

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Enrico GemelliMatches officiated: 10
3.2Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 210%Home wins60%Draws30%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Team Altamura vs Audace Cerignola?

The Serie C Group C match finished Team Altamura 1:1 Audace Cerignola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Team Altamura vs Audace Cerignola?

Team Altamura score 0.94 goals per game on average and Audace Cerignola 1.24. The Serie C Group C average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Team Altamura's matches and 53% of Audace Cerignola's.

What form are Team Altamura and Audace Cerignola in?

Over the last 5 games Team Altamura have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Audace Cerignola 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Team Altamura vs Audace Cerignola?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Team Altamura vs Audace Cerignola: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.