Team Altamura vs Siracusa: match statistics
Team Altamura vs Siracusa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Team Altamura played Siracusa in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Team Altamura: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Siracusa: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Team Altamura scores 0.88 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Siracusa scores 1.24 and concedes 1.48. League average: 2.50 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Team Altamura 48%, Siracusa 61%. Over 2.5: Team Altamura 39%, Siracusa 58%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Siracusa has higher xG: 1.49 vs 0.97. Team Altamura: 7.6 shots per match, Siracusa: 12.2.
Match halves
Team Altamura: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.45. Siracusa: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Team Altamura: 31-45+ (6 goals). Siracusa: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group C: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home side due to a stronger home profile: Altamura average 1.19 goals and concede 1.38 at home with a low FTS (13%). Siracusa have a good recent run (PPG 2, 10 goals) but terrible away stats: 75% losses, 0% clean sheets and only 0.75 away goals on average. Visitors dominate possession (59%) and have higher xG (1.25 vs 1.04), yet low conversion (~7%) and high FTS (44%) reduce their real threat. Altamura convert better at home (14%) and fail to be goalless less often, giving them the edge. Given Siracusa’s poor away form and Altamura’s home advantages, I predict an Altamura win, though the result is not certain.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Stats indicate a clear probability of BTTS: season BTTS 65% hosts and 56% guests vs league average 50%. Both sides have relatively high xG (1.73 and 1.25) and combined expected goals ~2.98, increasing chances of goals both ways. CS rates are low (12% and 0%), visitors have strong last5 attacking form (10 goals) while hosts consistently create chances (STOT 5.41). Despite hosts' recent dip in scoring, overall match profile favors mutual goals. Recommendation: BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Forecast relies on markedly higher home xG (1.73) and relatively high away xG against (1.22), giving expected ~1.48 for Altamura and ~1.19 for Siracusa. Altamura generates significantly more shots and SOT (14.06 and 5.41 vs 10.25 and 2.38) and has higher conversion, increasing scoring likelihood. Both teams commonly score and concede (BTTS: home 65%, away 56%) and season Over1.5 at 82%/75% strongly favors Over 1.5. Total expected ~2.67 goals also supports Over 2.5 but with less certainty than Over 1.5. Strongest signal: Over 1.5 — recommend playing Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The data indicate a clear home advantage this season (PPG 1.59 vs 0.38, xG 1.73 vs 1.25, considerably more shots on target), favoring their match victory. At the same time the hosts have a higher rate of HT draws (drawingAtHTPercentage_home 41% vs leadingAtHT 29%), which raises the probability of a draw after 45 minutes. First-half goal stats show hosts more often score in the second half, which supports a post-break turnaround. Based on these indicators the most likely scenario is a HT draw and an Altamura win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Team Altamura | Siracusa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Siracusa is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Team Altamura · 2 pts / match - Siracusa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Siracusa is 41% better for: goals scored per match.
0.88 goals / match - Team Altamura · 1.24 goals / match - Siracusa
Team Altamura is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.24 goals / match - Team Altamura · 1.48 goals / match - Siracusa
Team Altamura scores in 70% of matches (23 of 33 matches), while Siracusa keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 33 matches).
Siracusa scores in 67% of matches (22 of 33 matches), while Team Altamura keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Team Altamura
Over / Under - Siracusa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Team Altamura - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Siracusa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Team Altamura
Siracusa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Team Altamura | Liga | Siracusa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.12 | 2.50 | ▲ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 50% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 47% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 29% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 67% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 79% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Team Altamura 0 - 1 - 0 Siracusa. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Team Altamura vs Siracusa?
The Serie C Group C match finished Team Altamura 1:0 Siracusa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Team Altamura vs Siracusa?
Team Altamura score 0.88 goals per game on average and Siracusa 1.24. The Serie C Group C average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Team Altamura's matches and 61% of Siracusa's.
What form are Team Altamura and Siracusa in?
Over the last 5 games Team Altamura have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Siracusa 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Team Altamura vs Siracusa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.