Telecom Egypt SC vs El Seka El Hadid: match statistics
Telecom Egypt SC vs El Seka El Hadid: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Telecom Egypt SC played El Seka El Hadid in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 7 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Telecom Egypt SC: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. El Seka El Hadid: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Telecom Egypt SC scores 0.94 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. El Seka El Hadid scores 0.88 and concedes 1.03. League average: 1.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Telecom Egypt SC 41%, El Seka El Hadid 38%. Over 2.5: Telecom Egypt SC 41%, El Seka El Hadid 41%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
El Seka El Hadid has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.13. Telecom Egypt SC: 7.0 shots per match, El Seka El Hadid: 6.8.
Match halves
Telecom Egypt SC: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.59. El Seka El Hadid: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.66.
Goals by minute
Telecom Egypt SC: 76-90+ (8 goals). El Seka El Hadid: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
El Seka El Hadid displays clearly superior form over the last 5 matches: 3 wins and 2 losses (3-0-2), averaging 1.8 points per game, while Telecom Egypt SC has not won in their last 5 (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses) and averages only 0.6 points per game. In attack the visitors scored 6 goals in their last 5 matches and produce 1.06 goals per away game with 4 shots on target and 13% conversion, whereas Telecom at home have only 4 goals in their last 5 and average 0.69 goals per game with 2.73 shots on target and 9% conversion. Defensively the hosts are theoretically stronger at home (0.75 goals conceded per home game and 44% clean sheets), however Telecom have conceded as many as 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per game), while El Seka conceded 9 in those five. Chance quality also favors the visitors: average xG for El Seka away is 1.18 versus Telecom’s home xG of 1.05, which together with the higher conversion (13% vs 9%) gives an edge in creating and finishing chances. Considering Telecom’s 0 wins in the last 5, higher conversion and lower share of goalless away matches for the visitors (31% away matches without scoring vs 50% home matches for Telecom without a goal), the higher probability points to an El Seka victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The main signal favors No BTTS: both teams have a season BTTS rate of only 38% (Telecom 38%, El Seka 38%), and in the league 76% of matches end with a clean sheet for one side. Seasonal goals averages show low home output 0.69 goals per match versus 1.06 for the away side, with average goals conceded 1.0 (home) and 1.06 (away), increasing the likelihood of a one-scoring-team game. In the short term both teams have higher BTTS rates at 60% in the last 5 matches and higher recent goals conceded (2.0 for home, 1.8 for away), but this is a limited sample and does not outweigh the seasonal trend. Combined xG around ~2.42 (1.24 + 1.18), low shots on target 3.69 vs 4.0 and lower home conversion 9% versus 13% for the away team suggest a moderate number of chances, so overall I assign greater probability to the "No" scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and statistical analysis indicate total expected goals around 2.44: home attack xG 1.24 vs away defense xG 1.16 yields ~1.20 for the home side, while away attack xG 1.18 vs home defense xG 1.29 yields ~1.24 for the visitors. Seasonal goal averages show Telecom scores 0.69 and concedes 1.00, while El Seka scores 1.06 and concedes 1.06; combined with xG (1.24 and 1.18) and high over 0.5 rates (75% and 88%) this increases the likelihood of at least two goals. Given the expected 2.44 goals and that over 2.5 occurred in the last 5 matches at 60% for hosts and 80% for guests, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I assess 82% for Over 1.5). For the 2.5 line I forecast 48% Over vs 52% Under. Over 3.5 is low at 15% (hosts have 0% >3.5 this season, guests 31%), so I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the safest option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw appears to be the strongest signal: hosts were level at the break in 44% of matches, while visitors were level at half-time in 75%, so I anticipate a high share of HT draws (around 75%). After the break the advantage lies with the visitors — they score on average 0.94 goals in the second half and win second halves in 50% of matches, whereas hosts score 0.38 and win 19% of second halves. xG is similar (1.24 for the hosts versus 1.18 for the visitors), but the visitors have better finishing (13% vs 9%) and form (last five matches: visitors 60% wins, hosts 0%), which favors them in the second half. Therefore the most likely scenario is a half-time draw and a visitor turnaround to win the match (X/2 — 41%); I rate the hosts holding their lead (1/1 ~14%) or a full-time draw (X/X ~19%) as less likely, and combinations that start with the visitors leading at half-time are historically rare, hence a low weighting for 2/x options.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Telecom Egypt SC | El Seka El Hadid | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
El Seka El Hadid is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC · 1.8 pts / match - El Seka El Hadid
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Telecom Egypt SC is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC · 0.88 goals / match - El Seka El Hadid
Telecom Egypt SC is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.97 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC · 1.03 goals / match - El Seka El Hadid
Telecom Egypt SC scores in 59% of matches (19 of 32 matches), while El Seka El Hadid keeps a clean sheet in 41% (13 of 32 matches).
El Seka El Hadid scores in 59% of matches (19 of 32 matches), while Telecom Egypt SC keeps a clean sheet in 34% (11 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Telecom Egypt SC
Over / Under - El Seka El Hadid
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Telecom Egypt SC is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.28 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC · 0.88 pts / match - El Seka El Hadid
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Telecom Egypt SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
El Seka El Hadid - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Telecom Egypt SC
El Seka El Hadid
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Telecom Egypt SC | Liga | El Seka El Hadid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.91 | 1.93 | • 1.91 |
| Both teams scored | • 41% | 41% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 41% | 32% | ▲ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 34% | 38% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 68% | • 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Telecom Egypt SC 1 - 0 - 0 El Seka El Hadid. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Telecom Egypt SC vs El Seka El Hadid?
The Second Division match finished Telecom Egypt SC 0:0 El Seka El Hadid. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Telecom Egypt SC vs El Seka El Hadid?
Telecom Egypt SC score 0.94 goals per game on average and El Seka El Hadid 0.88. The Second Division average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Telecom Egypt SC's matches and 38% of El Seka El Hadid's.
What form are Telecom Egypt SC and El Seka El Hadid in?
Over the last 5 games Telecom Egypt SC have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and El Seka El Hadid 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Telecom Egypt SC vs El Seka El Hadid?
The statistical background for Telecom Egypt SC vs El Seka El Hadid — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


