Argentina - Prim B NacionalData current as of 23 July 2026

Temperley vs Agropecuario: match statistics

Temperley crest
Temperley
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Agropecuario crest
Agropecuario
130%(2.15)
X25%(2.70)
245%(3.50)

Agropecuario shows clearly better form in their last five matches, averaging 1.8 points per game compared to Temperley's 1.2. The visitors started the season with a win (1 win, 0 draws, 0 losses), while the hosts only managed a draw (0 wins, 1 draw, 0 losses). In their last five matches, Agropecuario scored 7 goals and secured 3 wins, while Temperley netted 5 goals with just 1 victory. The visitors' goal difference in the current season (2:1) is better than the hosts' (0:0), indicating higher offensive efficiency. Agropecuario's result sequence (wlwlw) demonstrates greater stability than Temperley's indecisive form (dwldd), which speaks in favor of an away win.

Temperley vs Agropecuario: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Temperley play Agropecuario in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match date is 23 February 2026 at 00:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Temperley: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Agropecuario: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Temperley scores 1.00 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Agropecuario scores 0.71 and concedes 1.19. League average: 1.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Temperley 38%, Agropecuario 38%. Over 2.5: Temperley 24%, Agropecuario 24%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Temperley has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.27. Temperley: 9.7 shots per match, Agropecuario: 10.6.

Match halves

Temperley: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.38. Agropecuario: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Temperley: 16-30 (8 goals). Agropecuario: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Prim B Nacional: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 0.33, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Agropecuario shows clearly better form in their last five matches, averaging 1.8 points per game compared to Temperley's 1.2. The visitors started the season with a win (1 win, 0 draws, 0 losses), while the hosts only managed a draw (0 wins, 1 draw, 0 losses). In their last five matches, Agropecuario scored 7 goals and secured 3 wins, while Temperley netted 5 goals with just 1 victory. The visitors' goal difference in the current season (2:1) is better than the hosts' (0:0), indicating higher offensive efficiency. Agropecuario's result sequence (wlwlw) demonstrates greater stability than Temperley's indecisive form (dwldd), which speaks in favor of an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
TemperleyAgropecuario
9Shots5
TemperleyAgropecuario
3Shots on target3
TemperleyAgropecuario
0.95xG0.68
TemperleyAgropecuario
3Corners9
TemperleyAgropecuario
22Dangerous attacks19
TemperleyAgropecuario
-1Fouls-1
TemperleyAgropecuario
5Cards4
TemperleyAgropecuario

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TemperleyAgropecuario
1Goals scored / match0.71
TemperleyAgropecuario
0.81Goals conceded / match1.19
TemperleyAgropecuario
50%Average possession49%
TemperleyAgropecuario
3.48Shots on target / match3.57
TemperleyAgropecuario

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.67Shots per match10.57
TemperleyAgropecuario
3.48Shots on target3.57
TemperleyAgropecuario
10.3%Shot conversion6.8%
TemperleyAgropecuario
50%Possession49%
TemperleyAgropecuario
1.31xG for1.27
TemperleyAgropecuario
1.29xG against1.31
TemperleyAgropecuario

Shooting quality

Temperley: BalancedAgropecuario: Balanced
TemperleyAgropecuario
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Temperley is 450% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Temperley · 0.4 pts / match - Agropecuario

Temperley
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W48% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-10-3
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 0.76BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Agropecuario
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W38% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-9
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Temperley is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Temperley · 0.71 goals / match - Agropecuario

Temperley is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - Temperley · 1.19 goals / match - Agropecuario

Temperley scoring profile: strong

Temperley scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Agropecuario keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

Agropecuario scoring profile: mixed

Agropecuario scores in 48% of matches (10 of 21 matches), while Temperley keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).

21Goals scored (season)15
TemperleyAgropecuario
17Goals conceded (season)25
TemperleyAgropecuario
1.81Average goals in match1.9
TemperleyAgropecuario
8Goals scored (last 5)2
TemperleyAgropecuario
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
TemperleyAgropecuario

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal48%
TemperleyAgropecuario
24%2 goals19%
TemperleyAgropecuario
10%3 goals5%
TemperleyAgropecuario
5%4 goals0%
TemperleyAgropecuario

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal67%
TemperleyAgropecuario
10%2 goals43%
TemperleyAgropecuario
10%3 goals5%
TemperleyAgropecuario
5%4 goals5%
TemperleyAgropecuario

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time10%
TemperleyAgropecuario
5%BTTS in both halves0%
TemperleyAgropecuario
14%Scored in both halves14%
TemperleyAgropecuario

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
TemperleyAgropecuario
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TemperleyAgropecuario
40%BTTS - last 540%
TemperleyAgropecuario

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
TemperleyAgropecuario
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
TemperleyAgropecuario
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
TemperleyAgropecuario

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
TemperleyAgropecuario
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
TemperleyAgropecuario
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
TemperleyAgropecuario

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Temperley is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Temperley · 0.76 pts / match - Agropecuario

Temperley - half-time state
38% leading52% draw10% trailing
Agropecuario - half-time state
10% leading48% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)0.76
TemperleyAgropecuario
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.19
TemperleyAgropecuario
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
TemperleyAgropecuario
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.81
TemperleyAgropecuario
71%Clean sheet before half-time52%
TemperleyAgropecuario
52%No goal before half-time81%
TemperleyAgropecuario

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.24
TemperleyAgropecuario
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
TemperleyAgropecuario
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
TemperleyAgropecuario
0.76Average goals (2nd half)1.1
TemperleyAgropecuario
67%Clean sheet after half-time62%
TemperleyAgropecuario
71%No goal after half-time57%
TemperleyAgropecuario

Temperley - second-half results

24% W43% R33% P
35
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Agropecuario - second-half results

29% W38% R33% P
16
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding190%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Temperley - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Agropecuario - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Temperley
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
8
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Agropecuario
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-82%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Temperley

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Agropecuario

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).

Teams vs league

TemperleyLigaAgropecuario
Average goals in match 1.811.89 1.90
Both teams scored 38%39% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%30% 24%
Clean sheets 48%39% 33%
Goal before half-time 57%56% 57%
Goal after half-time 57%70% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.89
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / match
0.75
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Temperley 1 - 2 - 0 Agropecuario. Average goals 0.33, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Agropecuario
0 : 0
Temperley
Club Agropecuario Argentino
0 : 0
CA Temperley
CA Temperley
1 : 0
Club Agropecuario Argentino

FAQ

What was the result of Temperley vs Agropecuario?

The Prim B Nacional match finished Temperley 1:0 Agropecuario. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Temperley and Agropecuario?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Temperley won 1, Agropecuario won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 0.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Temperley vs Agropecuario?

Temperley score 1.00 goals per game on average and Agropecuario 0.71. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Temperley's matches and 38% of Agropecuario's.

What form are Temperley and Agropecuario in?

Over the last 5 games Temperley have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Agropecuario 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Temperley vs Agropecuario?

The statistical background for Temperley vs Agropecuario — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.