Italy - Serie C Group BData current as of 07 September 2026

Ternana vs Città di Campobasso: match statistics

Ternana crest
Ternana
2 : 4half-time 1:1
Città di Campobasso crest
Città di Campobasso
155%(1.80)
X27%(3.20)
218%(4.00)

Ternana demonstrates significantly better form in home matches, winning as many as 62% of their home games with only 23% losses. The hosts show a clear advantage in key offensive metrics – averaging 1.38 goals per match and an xG of 1.89, which significantly exceeds Città di Campobasso's away figures (1.21 goals, xG 1.20). Particularly concerning for the visitors is the high percentage of matches without a goal scored away from home (43% FTS%), indicating issues with attacking efficiency. The recent form of both teams over the last five matches is similar; however, Ternana boasts a positive goal difference at home (+6), while Campobasso has a negative goal difference away (-2). Taking all statistics into account, the hosts' advantage is evident, though the visitors' experience in drawing away matches (36%) justifies a moderate probability of a points split.

Ternana vs Città di Campobasso: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ternana played Città di Campobasso in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

Ternana: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Città di Campobasso: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ternana scores 1.23 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Città di Campobasso scores 1.33 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ternana 46%, Città di Campobasso 52%. Over 2.5: Ternana 35%, Città di Campobasso 48%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Ternana has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.38. Ternana: 11.4 shots per match, Città di Campobasso: 11.6.

Match halves

Ternana: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.69. Città di Campobasso: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Ternana: 76-90+ (7 goals). Città di Campobasso: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.25 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ternana demonstrates significantly better form in home matches, winning as many as 62% of their home games with only 23% losses. The hosts show a clear advantage in key offensive metrics – averaging 1.38 goals per match and an xG of 1.89, which significantly exceeds Città di Campobasso's away figures (1.21 goals, xG 1.20). Particularly concerning for the visitors is the high percentage of matches without a goal scored away from home (43% FTS%), indicating issues with attacking efficiency. The recent form of both teams over the last five matches is similar; however, Ternana boasts a positive goal difference at home (+6), while Campobasso has a negative goal difference away (-2). Taking all statistics into account, the hosts' advantage is evident, though the visitors' experience in drawing away matches (36%) justifies a moderate probability of a points split.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
15Shots6
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
5Shots on target4
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
2.09xG0.99
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
5Corners2
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
110Dangerous attacks44
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
6Fouls19
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
1Cards2
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TernanaCittà di Campobasso
1.23Goals scored / match1.33
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
0.88Goals conceded / match1.19
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
50%Average possession50%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
3.77Shots on target / match4.04
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.42Shots per match11.63
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
3.77Shots on target4.04
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
10.8%Shot conversion11.5%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
50%Possession50%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
1.55xG for1.38
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
1.19xG against1.25
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

Shooting quality

Ternana: BalancedCittà di Campobasso: Balanced
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ternana is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Ternana · 1.8 pts / match - Città di Campobasso

Ternana
LDWWW
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Città di Campobasso
WLLWW
Season result split
41% W30% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-8
1.52 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Città di Campobasso is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Ternana · 1.33 goals / match - Città di Campobasso

Ternana is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - Ternana · 1.19 goals / match - Città di Campobasso

Ternana scoring profile: strong

Ternana scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Città di Campobasso keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

Città di Campobasso scoring profile: strong

Città di Campobasso scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Ternana keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).

32Goals scored (season)36
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
23Goals conceded (season)32
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
2.12Average goals in match2.52
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
9Goals scored (last 5)8
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal70%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
42%2 goals48%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
8%3 goals11%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
0%4 goals4%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal70%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
19%2 goals33%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
4%3 goals7%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
0%4 goals4%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Città di Campobasso - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 27 matches
48%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time15%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
4%BTTS in both halves4%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
35%Scored in both halves22%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
40%BTTS - last 580%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ternana is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / match - Ternana · 1.07 pts / match - Città di Campobasso

Ternana - half-time state
27% leading54% draw19% trailing
Città di Campobasso - half-time state
22% leading41% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per match (1st half)1.07
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.44
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
0.96Average goals (1st half)1.04
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
69%Clean sheet before half-time56%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
54%No goal before half-time67%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)1.63
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.48
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
58%Clean sheet after half-time59%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso
38%No goal after half-time41%
TernanaCittà di Campobasso

Ternana - second-half results

46% W27% R27% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Città di Campobasso - second-half results

41% W41% R19% P
29
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ternana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Città di Campobasso - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.202.00
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ternana
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
5
6
46-60
6
4
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Città di Campobasso
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
7
16-30
3
4
31-45
6
5
46-60
6
3
61-75
12
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ternana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Città di Campobasso

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

TernanaLigaCittà di Campobasso
Average goals in match 2.122.25 2.52
Both teams scored 46%48% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%38% 48%
Clean sheets 35%30% 30%
Goal before half-time 58%64% 63%
Goal after half-time 85%71% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.25
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Città di CampobassoGoalCristian PadulaAssist: Antonio Gala
  2. TernanaGoalŽan Majer
  3. Città di CampobassoYellow cardRoberto Pierno
  4. TernanaSubstitutionOn: Giuseppe PanicoOff: Stefano Pettinari
  5. TernanaGoalLiam KerriganAssist: Angelo Ndrecka
  6. Città di CampobassoYellow cardAlessandro Martina
  7. Città di CampobassoGoalEdoardo Lancini
  8. Città di CampobassoGoalAlfredo Bifulco
  9. TernanaYellow cardGiuseppe Panico
  10. Città di CampobassoSubstitutionOn: Antonello SerraOff: Alfredo Bifulco
  11. Città di CampobassoGoalSimone MagnaghiAssist: Antonio Gala

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ternana 1 - 0 - 0 Città di Campobasso. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Città di Campobasso
0 : 1
Ternana

FAQ

What was the result of Ternana vs Città di Campobasso?

The Serie C Group B match finished Ternana 2:4 Città di Campobasso. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ternana vs Città di Campobasso?

Ternana score 1.23 goals per game on average and Città di Campobasso 1.33. The Serie C Group B average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Ternana's matches and 52% of Città di Campobasso's.

What form are Ternana and Città di Campobasso in?

Over the last 5 games Ternana have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Città di Campobasso 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ternana vs Città di Campobasso?

The statistical background for Ternana vs Città di Campobasso — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.