Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tersana play Kahraba Ismailia in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 8 October 2026. Venue: Mit Okba Stadium.
Current form
Tersana: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Kahraba Ismailia: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tersana scores 0.86 and concedes 0.71 goals per match. Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.86 and concedes 0.57. League average: 2.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tersana 43%, Kahraba Ismailia 29%. Over 2.5: Tersana 14%, Kahraba Ismailia 43%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Kahraba Ismailia has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.10. Tersana: 12.1 shots per match, Kahraba Ismailia: 10.1.
Match halves
Tersana: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.43. Kahraba Ismailia: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
Tersana: 0-15 (2 goals). Kahraba Ismailia: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tersana | Kahraba Ismailia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.09 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kahraba Ismailia is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Tersana · 2.4 pts / match - Kahraba Ismailia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kahraba Ismailia is 116% better for: goals scored per match.
0.86 goals / match - Tersana · 1.86 goals / match - Kahraba Ismailia
Kahraba Ismailia is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.71 goals / match - Tersana · 0.57 goals / match - Kahraba Ismailia
Tersana scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 matches).
Kahraba Ismailia scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tersana
Over / Under - Kahraba Ismailia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kahraba Ismailia is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / match - Tersana · 2.14 pts / match - Kahraba Ismailia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tersana
Kahraba Ismailia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tersana | Liga | Kahraba Ismailia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.57 | 2.21 | ▲ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 14% | 39% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 33% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 59% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
When do Tersana and Kahraba Ismailia play?
Tersana face Kahraba Ismailia on 8 October 2026 in Second Division at Mit Okba Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia?
Tersana score 0.86 goals per game on average and Kahraba Ismailia 1.86. The Second Division average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Tersana's matches and 29% of Kahraba Ismailia's.
What form are Tersana and Kahraba Ismailia in?
Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kahraba Ismailia 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia?
The statistical background for Tersana vs Kahraba Ismailia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.