Tersana vs Proxy: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a close competition with a leaning towards a draw. Tersana presents stable home form with a goal difference of +2 and 42% clean sheets, yet only 33% wins at home. Proxy stands out with an excellent recent streak – unbeaten in the last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and only 1 goal conceded, confirming their defensive solidity. The visitors have better scoring efficiency (16% conversion vs 9% for the hosts) and higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.2), but their average away result involves 45% draws. Considering the defensive stability of both teams (xGA hosts 1.05, visitors 1.47) and Proxy's tendency to draw on the road, the most probable scenario is a sharing of points.
Tersana vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tersana played Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 26 February 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
Tersana: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Proxy: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tersana scores 0.74 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. Proxy scores 1.00 and concedes 0.91. League average: 1.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tersana 30%, Proxy 57%. Over 2.5: Tersana 17%, Proxy 35%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 29%.
xG, shots and style
Proxy has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.30. Tersana: 8.3 shots per match, Proxy: 7.2.
Match halves
Tersana: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.35. Proxy: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.52.
Goals by minute
Tersana: 0-15 (6 goals). Proxy: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.85 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 29%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a close competition with a leaning towards a draw. Tersana presents stable home form with a goal difference of +2 and 42% clean sheets, yet only 33% wins at home. Proxy stands out with an excellent recent streak – unbeaten in the last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and only 1 goal conceded, confirming their defensive solidity. The visitors have better scoring efficiency (16% conversion vs 9% for the hosts) and higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.2), but their average away result involves 45% draws. Considering the defensive stability of both teams (xGA hosts 1.05, visitors 1.47) and Proxy's tendency to draw on the road, the most probable scenario is a sharing of points.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tersana | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Proxy is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Tersana · 1.8 pts / match - Proxy
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Proxy is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
0.74 goals / match - Tersana · 1 goals / match - Proxy
Tersana is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.78 goals / match - Tersana · 0.91 goals / match - Proxy
Tersana scores in 48% of matches (11 of 23 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).
Proxy scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tersana
Over / Under - Proxy
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Proxy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tersana
Proxy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tersana | Liga | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.52 | 1.85 | • 1.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 40% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 29% | ▲ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 39% | • 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 39% | 51% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 66% | • 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- ProxyGoalMohamed Gamal Fahim
- ProxyGoalAmr Marei
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tersana 0 - 1 - 0 Proxy. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tersana vs Proxy?
The Second Division match finished Tersana 3:3 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Proxy?
Tersana score 0.74 goals per game on average and Proxy 1.00. The Second Division average is 1.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Tersana's matches and 57% of Proxy's.
What form are Tersana and Proxy in?
Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Proxy 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Proxy?
The statistical background for Tersana vs Proxy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.