Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

Tersana vs Telecom Egypt SC: match statistics

Tersana crest
Tersana
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Telecom Egypt SC crest
Telecom Egypt SC
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a tight match with the draw scenario prevailing. Tersana exhibits poor recent form with four draws and one defeat in their last five matches, failing to register a single win. Telecom Egypt SC is also going through a slump, losing four of their last five fixtures. The hosts boast a better home goal difference (+2) and a higher xG (1.41 vs 1.1), but their high percentage of matches without a goal (46%) raises concerns. The visitors stand out with better efficiency (16% shot conversion rate) and a solid away record (42% wins, 42% draws), but their current form is alarming. Given the poor disposition of both teams and Tersana's history of home draws (38%), a sharing of points appears to be the most probable outcome.

Tersana vs Telecom Egypt SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tersana play Telecom Egypt SC in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 13 March 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Tersana: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Telecom Egypt SC: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tersana scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Telecom Egypt SC scores 0.88 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tersana 41%, Telecom Egypt SC 38%. Over 2.5: Tersana 26%, Telecom Egypt SC 41%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Tersana has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.12. Tersana: 8.4 shots per match, Telecom Egypt SC: 7.0.

Match halves

Tersana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.38. Telecom Egypt SC: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Tersana: 0-15 (8 goals). Telecom Egypt SC: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a tight match with the draw scenario prevailing. Tersana exhibits poor recent form with four draws and one defeat in their last five matches, failing to register a single win. Telecom Egypt SC is also going through a slump, losing four of their last five fixtures. The hosts boast a better home goal difference (+2) and a higher xG (1.41 vs 1.1), but their high percentage of matches without a goal (46%) raises concerns. The visitors stand out with better efficiency (16% shot conversion rate) and a solid away record (42% wins, 42% draws), but their current form is alarming. Given the poor disposition of both teams and Tersana's history of home draws (38%), a sharing of points appears to be the most probable outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
9Shots7
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
6Shots on target3
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
1.34xG0.99
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
4Corners3
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
48Dangerous attacks46
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
16Fouls8
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0Cards0
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0.91Goals scored / match0.88
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0.94Goals conceded / match1
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
44%Average possession45%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
3.35Shots on target / match2.65
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.38Shots per match6.97
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
3.35Shots on target2.65
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
10.9%Shot conversion12.7%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
44%Possession45%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
1.28xG for1.12
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
1.14xG against1.09
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

Shooting quality

Tersana: BalancedTelecom Egypt SC: Counter-attacking
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tersana is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Tersana · 0.6 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Tersana
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W47% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-16-10
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-4
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Telecom Egypt SC
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W38% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-13-10
1.35 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-8-4
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tersana is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Tersana · 1 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Tersana scoring profile: mixed

Tersana scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Telecom Egypt SC keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

Telecom Egypt SC scoring profile: mixed

Telecom Egypt SC scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

31Goals scored (season)30
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
32Goals conceded (season)34
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
1.85Average goals in match1.88
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
7Goals scored (last 5)2
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal56%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
21%2 goals29%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
12%3 goals3%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
3%4 goals0%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal65%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
21%2 goals26%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
6%3 goals9%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
3%4 goals0%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Telecom Egypt SC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 34 matches
41%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time6%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
6%BTTS in both halves3%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
18%Scored in both halves15%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
80%BTTS - last 540%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time6%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tersana - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing
Telecom Egypt SC - half-time state
26% leading44% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.24
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.32
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0.94Average goals (1st half)0.68
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
65%Clean sheet before half-time65%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
59%No goal before half-time68%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.21
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
0.91Average goals (2nd half)1.21
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
56%Clean sheet after half-time47%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC
68%No goal after half-time62%
TersanaTelecom Egypt SC

Tersana - second-half results

18% W53% R29% P
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Telecom Egypt SC - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
42
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tersana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.80.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Telecom Egypt SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tersana
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Telecom Egypt SC
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
0
2
16-30
7
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
7
6
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tersana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Telecom Egypt SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

TersanaLigaTelecom Egypt SC
Average goals in match 1.851.95 1.88
Both teams scored 41%41% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%32% 41%
Clean sheets 35%38% 35%
Goal before half-time 53%53% 62%
Goal after half-time 59%67% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tersana 0 - 0 - 1 Telecom Egypt SC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Telecom Egypt SC
1 : 0
Tersana

FAQ

What was the result of Tersana vs Telecom Egypt SC?

The Second Division match finished Tersana 2:2 Telecom Egypt SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Telecom Egypt SC?

Tersana score 0.91 goals per game on average and Telecom Egypt SC 0.88. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Tersana's matches and 38% of Telecom Egypt SC's.

What form are Tersana and Telecom Egypt SC in?

Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Telecom Egypt SC 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Telecom Egypt SC?

The statistical background for Tersana vs Telecom Egypt SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.