Teuta Durrës vs AF Elbasani: match statistics
Teuta Durrës vs AF Elbasani: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Teuta Durrës played AF Elbasani in Superliga (Albania). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Teuta Durrës: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. AF Elbasani: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Teuta Durrës scores 0.87 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. AF Elbasani scores 1.26 and concedes 0.84. League average: 2.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Teuta Durrës 45%, AF Elbasani 52%. Over 2.5: Teuta Durrës 26%, AF Elbasani 39%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
AF Elbasani has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.20. Teuta Durrës: 9.5 shots per match, AF Elbasani: 10.2.
Match halves
Teuta Durrës: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.45. AF Elbasani: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Teuta Durrës: 31-45+ (7 goals). AF Elbasani: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Superliga: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
AF Elbasani sit 2nd in the table while Teuta are 6th; visitors have 15 wins versus 8 and have scored 39 goals compared to the hosts' 27. In the last 5 matches Elbasani have scored 7 goals and average 1.6 points per game (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss), whereas Teuta have 5 goals and only 0.8 points per game (1-1-3). Chance quality is similar (attacking xG 1.21 for the visitors vs 1.23 for the hosts), but Elbasani are more efficient: conversion 15% vs 11%, 3.8 shots on target per game vs 3, and a lower risk of being shut out (FTS 13% vs 27%). Teuta’s defense at home looks better by xG against (0.96) and hosts concede 1.0 goal per home match on average, while visitors concede 1.2 on the road and have a higher xG against (1.64), indicating some defensive vulnerabilities for Elbasani. In summary, the visitors’ edge is supported by a better win record, higher efficiency and higher average goals scored per match (1.33 away vs 1.07 home), therefore I predict an AF Elbasani win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Teuta at home concedes only 0.5 goals per game this season and keeps a clean sheet in 56% of matches, while the league overall sees 67% of games ending with at least one clean sheet — a significant factor against BTTS. AF Elbasani averages 1.33 goals per game and has a seasonal BTTS rate of 60%; in the last 5 matches they score 1.4 goals on average, so they can find the net even against stronger defenses. In xG terms the hosts generate 1.44 xG with xG_against 1.1, while the visitors have xG_for 1.21 and xG_against 1.64, indicating Elbasani creates chances but Teuta seasonally limits conceded opportunities effectively. Although Teuta has conceded 8 goals in the last 5 matches (1.6 per game), the hosts’ 56% clean sheet rate and the low league BTTS frequency (45%) prevail; therefore I assign a higher probability to the “No” (No Goal/clean sheet expected) scenario — 60% vs 40% for BTTS (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis indicates a combined value of about 2.70 goals: Teuta has xG 1.44 while Elbasani concedes an average 1.64 xG (about 1.54 expected goals for the home side), whereas Elbasani has xG 1.21 with Teuta defending at 1.10 xG (≈1.16 for the away side). Seasonal figures support a moderate number of goals — Over 1.5 occurred in 56% of Teuta’s matches and 60% of Elbasani’s, while Over 2.5 is 31%/47%; in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 rose to 40% for Teuta and 60% for Elbasani. At the same time Teuta have a very solid home defense — conceding on average 0.5 goals per match and keeping 56% clean sheets, with 0% of matches above 3.5 goals, which limits the risk of a very high-scoring outcome. A Poisson model with lambda=2.70 yields estimates: Over 1.5 ≈75%, Over 2.5 ≈51% and Over 3.5 ≈29%, therefore the strongest and safest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a draw at half-time because the hosts were level at the break in 13 matches (81%) and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 94% of games; on average they score 0.38 goals by half-time and concede only 0.06. After the break I expect Teuta Durrës to win — the home side win 56% of their matches at home with just 6% defeats, and in second halves they score on average 0.81 goals and register 1.25 goals after the break, which has translated into 26 points and 1.63 points per game in second halves. Additionally, the advantage in quality of chances is with the hosts: xG is 1.44 versus 1.21 for the visitors, while opponents generate xG of 1.64 against the visitors whereas the hosts concede 1.10, suggesting greater chances for Teuta to produce a turnaround after the break. In light of these figures the strongest HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time and a home victory (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Teuta Durrës | AF Elbasani | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AF Elbasani is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Teuta Durrës · 2 pts / match - AF Elbasani
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AF Elbasani is 45% better for: goals scored per match.
0.87 goals / match - Teuta Durrës · 1.26 goals / match - AF Elbasani
AF Elbasani is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Teuta Durrës · 0.84 goals / match - AF Elbasani
Teuta Durrës scores in 65% of matches (20 of 31 matches), while AF Elbasani keeps a clean sheet in 45% (14 of 31 matches).
AF Elbasani scores in 84% of matches (26 of 31 matches), while Teuta Durrës keeps a clean sheet in 39% (12 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Teuta Durrës
Over / Under - AF Elbasani
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AF Elbasani is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Teuta Durrës · 1.48 pts / match - AF Elbasani
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Teuta Durrës - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
AF Elbasani - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Teuta Durrës
AF Elbasani
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Teuta Durrës | Liga | AF Elbasani | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.81 | 2.08 | • 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | • 45% | 45% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 26% | 33% | ▲ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 39% | 34% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 62% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 58% | 68% | • 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Teuta Durrës 0 - 2 - 1 AF Elbasani. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Teuta Durrës vs AF Elbasani?
The Superliga match finished Teuta Durrës 1:2 AF Elbasani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Teuta Durrës and AF Elbasani?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Teuta Durrës won 0, AF Elbasani won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Teuta Durrës vs AF Elbasani?
Teuta Durrës score 0.87 goals per game on average and AF Elbasani 1.26. The Superliga average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Teuta Durrës's matches and 52% of AF Elbasani's.
What form are Teuta Durrës and AF Elbasani in?
Over the last 5 games Teuta Durrës have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and AF Elbasani 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Teuta Durrës vs AF Elbasani?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Teuta Durrës vs AF Elbasani: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


