Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildData current as of 06 September 2026

Thór vs Fram: match statistics

Thór crest
Thór
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Fram crest
Fram

Thór vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Thór played Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 23 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Thór: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Fram: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Thór scores 2.00 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Fram scores 3.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Thór 100%, Fram 100%. Over 2.5: Thór 100%, Fram 100%. League level: BTTS 80%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Fram has higher xG: 1.92 vs 1.21. Thór: 10.5 shots per match, Fram: 15.5.

Match halves

Thór: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50. Fram: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 2.50.

Goals by minute

Thór: 76-90+ (2 goals). Fram: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.67 goals per match, BTTS 80%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fram appears the favorite due to higher league position (4th vs 7th for Thór) and superior goal output this season: 6 scored vs 4 for the hosts. In the last 5 matches Fram has scored 16 and conceded 14, while Thór has scored 11 and conceded 13, indicating the visitors are more productive offensively (16 vs 11) despite similar defensive vulnerability (14 vs 13). In terms of form Fram averages 1.4 points per game over the last 5 fixtures, Thór 1.2, and recent results patterns (Fram: 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses; Thór: 2 wins, 3 losses) give a slight edge to the visitors. Seasonal defensive numbers also favor Fram — seasonally Fram concedes 4 goals vs 6 for Thór, and the season goal difference (Fram +2 vs Thór -2) suggests the visitors are more effective at deciding matches. Considering higher position, greater efficiency in the last 5 matches and better season balance, I tip a victory for the visitors, although an open game with multiple goals is likely given the high number of goals conceded by both teams in the last 5 matches.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

League and seasonal indicators strongly favor BTTS - Yes: league BTTS rate is 83%, and Thór has seasonal BTTS at 100% with 0% clean sheets. Fram’s seasonal data is partially incomplete (goals for avg 0.0 and goals against avg 0.0), so I place greater weight on last 5 matches form, where Fram has BTTS 100%. In the last 5 matches Thór averages 2.2 goals scored and concedes 2.6, while Fram averages 3.2 scored and concedes 2.8, which clearly indicates both teams regularly score and concede. xG confirms this picture: Thór seasonally has xG 1.91 versus opponent xG 1.49, and in the last 5 matches Thór’s xG for is 1.33 versus 1.69 xG against; Fram in the last 5 has xG for 1.62 and xG against 1.62, so both sides create chances and allow opportunities. Considering Thór’s 100% BTTS, Fram’s 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches, league BTTS share of 83% and a combined 27 goals scored in the last 5 matches between both teams (11+16), I estimate the probability of BTTS at 85% (Yes) versus 15% (No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistical analysis points to a high-goals potential: Thór averages 3.0 goals scored at home and concedes 2.0 this season, with a match xG of 1.91 versus xG against 1.49. Fram's last 5 matches show xG 1.62 while Thór's is 1.33, yielding combined expected xG of ~2.95 (1.33+1.62); therefore I forecast roughly 2.95 total goals. Thór’s season home Over 2.5 rate is 100%, and in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 occurred in 80% for hosts and 100% for guests; the league averages 3.75 goals per match and 83% of matches feature goals for both teams, which reinforces goal expectations. Based on this I assign a high probability for Over 1.5 (97%) and moderately high for Over 2.5 (76%), while Over 3.5 is rated lower (28%) because the goals average from the last 5 matches is about 2.7 per game (27 goals in 10 matches). The best market to play is Over 2.5 (back the over), since the expected 2.95 goals combined with strong Over indicators and a high percentage of BTTS in form provide the greatest edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Thór scores on average 3.0 goals per match and concedes 2.0 (goal difference +1.0), with xG of 1.91 versus 1.49 xG conceded, providing the home side an offensive edge. At half-time Thór led in 50% of the season’s matches and were level in 50%, with an average of 0.5 goals scored at the break and 0.0 conceded, so HT more often finishes 1-0 than 0-1. In the second half the hosts average 2.5 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, and as many as 3 goals were scored in minutes 76–90, indicating they can hold or extend a lead after the break. A season-long 100% BTTS at Thór’s stadium suggests the opponent is also likely to score, but the xG advantage and the 3.0 vs 2.0 average incline toward a home win. Therefore I project HT/FT 1/1 as the strongest scenario with a 33% probability, with alternatives 1/X (12%) and X/1 (30%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
ThórFram
5Shots20
ThórFram
3Shots on target2
ThórFram
0.72xG2.02
ThórFram
2Corners11
ThórFram
26Dangerous attacks86
ThórFram
15Fouls15
ThórFram
2Cards1
ThórFram

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match3
ThórFram
3Goals conceded / match2
ThórFram
37%Average possession53%
ThórFram
2.5Shots on target / match5.5
ThórFram

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match15.5
ThórFram
2.5Shots on target5.5
ThórFram
19%Shot conversion19.4%
ThórFram
37%Possession53%
ThórFram
1.21xG for1.92
ThórFram
2.45xG against1.49
ThórFram

Shooting quality

Thór: Counter-attackingFram: Attacking
ThórFram
Accuracy (shots on target)24%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.800.55

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fram is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Thór · 2 pts / match - Fram

Thór
WL
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 2.45BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Fram
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fram is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Thór · 3 goals / match - Fram

Fram is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

3 goals / match - Thór · 2 goals / match - Fram

Thór scoring profile: very strong

Thór scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)6
ThórFram
6Goals conceded (season)4
ThórFram
5Average goals in match5
ThórFram
4Goals scored (last 5)6
ThórFram
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
ThórFram

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
ThórFram
100%2 goals100%
ThórFram
0%3 goals100%
ThórFram
0%4 goals0%
ThórFram

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
ThórFram
50%2 goals50%
ThórFram
50%3 goals50%
ThórFram
50%4 goals0%
ThórFram

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
ThórFram
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ThórFram
50%Scored in both halves50%
ThórFram

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
ThórFram
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ThórFram
100%BTTS - last 5100%
ThórFram

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
ThórFram
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
ThórFram
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ThórFram

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ThórFram
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
ThórFram
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time100%
ThórFram

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fram is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Thór · 2 pts / match - Fram

Thór - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Fram - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)2
ThórFram
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
ThórFram
1.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
ThórFram
2Average goals (1st half)0.5
ThórFram
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
ThórFram
50%No goal before half-time50%
ThórFram

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)2
ThórFram
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)2.5
ThórFram
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)2
ThórFram
3Average goals (2nd half)4.5
ThórFram
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
ThórFram
0%No goal after half-time0%
ThórFram

Thór - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fram - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+2.0

Concedes 2.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Thór - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.50
Goals scored / match0.51.5
Goals conceded / match1.51.5
Average goals in match2.03.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet0%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1
Fram - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.52.5
Goals conceded / match0.02.0
Average goals in match0.54.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Thór
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Fram
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

5.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 3.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
136%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Thór

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.79
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
167%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ThórLigaFram
Average goals in match 5.003.67 5.00
Both teams scored 100%80% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%60% 100%
Clean sheets 0%13% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%80% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%87% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.67
Average goals per match
80%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
13%
Clean sheets
1.87
Home goals / match
1.80
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
27%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FramYellow cardKyle McLagan
  2. ThórYellow cardIsaac Atanga
  3. ThórYellow cardEinar Freyr Halldórsson
  4. FramSubstitutionOn: Kristófer KonrádssonOff: Kyle McLagan
  5. ThórSubstitutionOn: Aron Ingi MagnússonOff: Christian Jakobsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Thór vs Fram?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Thór 1:0 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Thór vs Fram?

Thór score 2.00 goals per game on average and Fram 3.00. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Thór's matches and 100% of Fram's.

What form are Thór and Fram in?

Over the last 5 games Thór have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Fram 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thór vs Fram?

The statistical background for Thór vs Fram — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.