Argentina - Primera DivisiónEstadio José DellagiovannaData current as of 03 November 2026

Tigre vs Sarmiento: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Tigre vs Sarmiento: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tigre play Sarmiento in Primera División (Argentina). The match date is 8 November 2026. Venue: Estadio José Dellagiovanna.

Current form

Tigre: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sarmiento: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tigre scores 1.06 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Sarmiento scores 1.16 and concedes 1.39. League average: 2.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tigre 52%, Sarmiento 55%. Over 2.5: Tigre 35%, Sarmiento 48%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Tigre has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.22. Tigre: 13.7 shots per match, Sarmiento: 10.5.

Match halves

Tigre: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.65. Sarmiento: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Tigre: 46-60 (9 goals). Sarmiento: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.19 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(1.73)
(3.35)
(5.00)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.06Goals scored / match1.16
TigreSarmiento
1Goals conceded / match1.39
TigreSarmiento
49%Average possession43%
TigreSarmiento
4.23Shots on target / match3.65
TigreSarmiento

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.71Shots per match10.48
TigreSarmiento
4.23Shots on target3.65
TigreSarmiento
7.8%Shot conversion11.1%
TigreSarmiento
49%Possession43%
TigreSarmiento
1.52xG for1.22
TigreSarmiento
1.33xG against1.76
TigreSarmiento

Shooting quality

Tigre: BalancedSarmiento: Balanced
TigreSarmiento
Accuracy (shots on target)31%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sarmiento is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Tigre · 1 pts / match - Sarmiento

Tigre
LLDLW
Season result split
26% W39% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-11
1.16 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Sarmiento
WDDLL
Season result split
39% W13% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-15
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-11
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sarmiento is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - Tigre · 1.16 goals / match - Sarmiento

Tigre is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Tigre · 1.39 goals / match - Sarmiento

Tigre scoring profile: strong

Tigre scores in 65% of matches (20 of 31 matches), while Sarmiento keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 matches).

Sarmiento scoring profile: very strong

Sarmiento scores in 77% of matches (24 of 31 matches), while Tigre keeps a clean sheet in 29% (9 of 31 matches).

33Goals scored (season)36
TigreSarmiento
31Goals conceded (season)43
TigreSarmiento
2.06Average goals in match2.55
TigreSarmiento
6Goals scored (last 5)6
TigreSarmiento
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
TigreSarmiento

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal77%
TigreSarmiento
29%2 goals35%
TigreSarmiento
10%3 goals3%
TigreSarmiento
3%4 goals0%
TigreSarmiento

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal74%
TigreSarmiento
26%2 goals39%
TigreSarmiento
3%3 goals19%
TigreSarmiento
0%4 goals6%
TigreSarmiento

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time13%
TigreSarmiento
3%BTTS in both halves0%
TigreSarmiento
16%Scored in both halves19%
TigreSarmiento

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
TigreSarmiento
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
TigreSarmiento
60%BTTS - last 580%
TigreSarmiento

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
TigreSarmiento
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
TigreSarmiento
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
TigreSarmiento

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
TigreSarmiento
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
TigreSarmiento
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
TigreSarmiento

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sarmiento is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - Tigre · 1.65 pts / match - Sarmiento

Tigre - half-time state
23% leading48% draw29% trailing
Sarmiento - half-time state
45% leading29% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.65
TigreSarmiento
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.65
TigreSarmiento
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
TigreSarmiento
0.84Average goals (1st half)1.1
TigreSarmiento
68%Clean sheet before half-time61%
TigreSarmiento
68%No goal before half-time45%
TigreSarmiento

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.87
TigreSarmiento
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
TigreSarmiento
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
TigreSarmiento
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.45
TigreSarmiento
48%Clean sheet after half-time32%
TigreSarmiento
52%No goal after half-time58%
TigreSarmiento

Tigre - second-half results

26% W52% D23% L
36
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sarmiento - second-half results

19% W29% D52% L
51
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tigre - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sarmiento - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tigre
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
7
4
16-30
2
5
31-45
9
6
46-60
4
7
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Sarmiento
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
7
5
16-30
6
6
31-45
2
9
46-60
5
8
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tigre

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Sarmiento

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

TigreLigaSarmiento
Average goals in match▼ 2.062.19▲ 2.55
Both teams scored▲ 52%48%▲ 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 35%39%▲ 48%
Clean sheets▼ 29%32%▼ 26%
Goal before half-time▼ 55%62%▲ 81%
Goal after half-time▼ 71%74%▲ 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.19
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Tigre 0 - 0 - 2 Sarmiento. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Sarmiento
1 : 0
Tigre
Sarmiento
2 : 0
Tigre

FAQ

When do Tigre and Sarmiento play?

Tigre face Sarmiento on 8 November 2026 in Primera División at Estadio José Dellagiovanna. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tigre and Sarmiento?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tigre won 0, Sarmiento won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tigre vs Sarmiento?

Tigre score 1.06 goals per game on average and Sarmiento 1.16. The Primera División average is 2.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Tigre's matches and 55% of Sarmiento's.

What form are Tigre and Sarmiento in?

Over the last 5 games Tigre have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sarmiento 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tigre vs Sarmiento?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tigre vs Sarmiento: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.