Mexico - Liga MXData current as of 24 July 2026

Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM: match statistics

Tigres UANL crest
Tigres UANL
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Pumas UNAM crest
Pumas UNAM
165%(1.60)
X22%(3.40)
213%(5.00)

Tigres UANL display significantly superior home form, boasting an impressive 67% win rate and just 8% losses at their own stadium. The hosts average 2.42 goals scored per home game against only 0.75 conceded, resulting in a dominant +20 goal difference. Conversely, Pumas UNAM struggle on their travels with a mere 30% win rate and a 40% loss rate, conceding 1.9 goals per away match. xG metrics further support Tigres (1.88 vs 1.2), backed by superior possession statistics (54% vs 46%). Considering the home advantage, current form, and underlying data, Tigres UANL are the decisive favorites.

Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tigres UANL play Pumas UNAM in Liga MX (Mexico). The match date is 15 January 2026 at 04:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Tigres UANL: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Pumas UNAM: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tigres UANL scores 1.79 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Pumas UNAM scores 1.63 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tigres UANL 57%, Pumas UNAM 63%. Over 2.5: Tigres UANL 50%, Pumas UNAM 49%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tigres UANL has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.28. Tigres UANL: 15.0 shots per match, Pumas UNAM: 11.7.

Match halves

Tigres UANL: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.12. Pumas UNAM: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Tigres UANL: 46-60 (17 goals). Pumas UNAM: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga MX: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Tigres UANL display significantly superior home form, boasting an impressive 67% win rate and just 8% losses at their own stadium. The hosts average 2.42 goals scored per home game against only 0.75 conceded, resulting in a dominant +20 goal difference. Conversely, Pumas UNAM struggle on their travels with a mere 30% win rate and a 40% loss rate, conceding 1.9 goals per away match. xG metrics further support Tigres (1.88 vs 1.2), backed by superior possession statistics (54% vs 46%). Considering the home advantage, current form, and underlying data, Tigres UANL are the decisive favorites.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
31Shots7
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
6Shots on target4
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
2.98xG0.91
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
18Corners2
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
86Dangerous attacks25
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
9Fouls15
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
3Cards6
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.79Goals scored / match1.63
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.05Goals conceded / match1.32
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
54%Average possession50%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
5.48Shots on target / match3.8
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match11.71
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
5.48Shots on target3.8
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
11.9%Shot conversion14%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
54%Possession50%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.64xG for1.28
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.31xG against1.65
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Shooting quality

Tigres UANL: AttackingPumas UNAM: Efficient finishing
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tigres UANL is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Tigres UANL · 1 pts / match - Pumas UNAM

Tigres UANL
DDWWL
Season result split
48% W29% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-12-10
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
13-5-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Pumas UNAM
DLWDL
Season result split
39% W37% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-15-10
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-8-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.91BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tigres UANL is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.79 goals / match - Tigres UANL · 1.63 goals / match - Pumas UNAM

Tigres UANL is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.05 goals / match - Tigres UANL · 1.32 goals / match - Pumas UNAM

Tigres UANL scoring profile: very strong

Tigres UANL scores in 79% of matches (33 of 42 matches), while Pumas UNAM keeps a clean sheet in 29% (12 of 41 matches).

Pumas UNAM scoring profile: very strong

Pumas UNAM scores in 88% of matches (36 of 41 matches), while Tigres UANL keeps a clean sheet in 33% (14 of 42 matches).

75Goals scored (season)67
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
44Goals conceded (season)54
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
2.83Average goals in match2.95
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
9Goals scored (last 5)5
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal88%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
40%2 goals44%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
24%3 goals22%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
19%4 goals10%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal71%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
26%2 goals39%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
12%3 goals20%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
0%4 goals2%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time27%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
7%BTTS in both halves5%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
31%Scored in both halves22%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
60%BTTS - last 540%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pumas UNAM is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Tigres UANL · 1.56 pts / match - Pumas UNAM

Tigres UANL - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing
Pumas UNAM - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.56
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.51
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
62%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
57%No goal before half-time46%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

After half-time (2nd half)

1.76Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.12Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.44
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
52%Clean sheet after half-time54%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
33%No goal after half-time44%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Tigres UANL - second-half results

50% W26% R24% P
60
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
74
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pumas UNAM - second-half results

32% W37% R32% P
64
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tigres UANL - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pumas UNAM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tigres UANL
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
8
7
16-30
12
7
31-45
17
8
46-60
16
6
61-75
14
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Pumas UNAM
ScoredConceded
13
5
0-15
8
4
16-30
16
16
31-45
6
7
46-60
9
10
61-75
15
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tigres UANL

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Pumas UNAM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga MX).

Teams vs league

Tigres UANLLigaPumas UNAM
Average goals in match 2.832.91 2.95
Both teams scored 57%59% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%55% 49%
Clean sheets 33%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 57%72% 71%
Goal after half-time 83%76% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.69
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+40%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tigres UANL 0 - 1 - 0 Pumas UNAM. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Club Universidad Nacional
1 : 1
Tigres UANL

FAQ

What was the result of Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM?

The Liga MX match finished Tigres UANL 0:1 Pumas UNAM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM?

Tigres UANL score 1.79 goals per game on average and Pumas UNAM 1.63. The Liga MX average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Tigres UANL's matches and 63% of Pumas UNAM's.

What form are Tigres UANL and Pumas UNAM in?

Over the last 5 games Tigres UANL have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Pumas UNAM 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.