Mexico - Liga MXData current as of 13 September 2026

Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM: match statistics

Tigres UANL crest
Tigres UANL
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Pumas UNAM crest
Pumas UNAM
165%(1.60)
X22%(3.40)
213%(5.00)

Tigres UANL display significantly superior home form, boasting an impressive 67% win rate and just 8% losses at their own stadium. The hosts average 2.42 goals scored per home game against only 0.75 conceded, resulting in a dominant +20 goal difference. Conversely, Pumas UNAM struggle on their travels with a mere 30% win rate and a 40% loss rate, conceding 1.9 goals per away match. xG metrics further support Tigres (1.88 vs 1.2), backed by superior possession statistics (54% vs 46%). Considering the home advantage, current form, and underlying data, Tigres UANL are the decisive favorites.

Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tigres UANL played Pumas UNAM in Liga MX (Mexico). The match was played on 15 January 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Tigres UANL: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Pumas UNAM: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tigres UANL scores 1.92 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Pumas UNAM scores 1.37 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tigres UANL 54%, Pumas UNAM 74%. Over 2.5: Tigres UANL 46%, Pumas UNAM 47%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tigres UANL has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.34. Tigres UANL: 15.5 shots per match, Pumas UNAM: 12.1.

Match halves

Tigres UANL: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.17. Pumas UNAM: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Tigres UANL: 46-60 (11 goals). Pumas UNAM: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga MX: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tigres UANL display significantly superior home form, boasting an impressive 67% win rate and just 8% losses at their own stadium. The hosts average 2.42 goals scored per home game against only 0.75 conceded, resulting in a dominant +20 goal difference. Conversely, Pumas UNAM struggle on their travels with a mere 30% win rate and a 40% loss rate, conceding 1.9 goals per away match. xG metrics further support Tigres (1.88 vs 1.2), backed by superior possession statistics (54% vs 46%). Considering the home advantage, current form, and underlying data, Tigres UANL are the decisive favorites.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
31Shots7
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
6Shots on target4
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
2.98xG0.91
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
18Corners2
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
86Dangerous attacks25
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
9Fouls15
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
3Cards6
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.92Goals scored / match1.37
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1Goals conceded / match1.53
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
54%Average possession53%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
5.71Shots on target / match3.63
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.5Shots per match12.05
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
5.71Shots on target3.63
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
12.4%Shot conversion11.4%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
54%Possession53%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.71xG for1.34
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.32xG against1.36
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Shooting quality

Tigres UANL: AttackingPumas UNAM: Balanced
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
Accuracy (shots on target)37%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tigres UANL
DDWLW
Season result split
54% W33% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-8-3
1.96 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.94Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Pumas UNAM
DWWLD
Season result split
26% W37% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-7
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tigres UANL is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.92 goals / match - Tigres UANL · 1.37 goals / match - Pumas UNAM

Tigres UANL is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Tigres UANL · 1.53 goals / match - Pumas UNAM

Tigres UANL scoring profile: very strong

Tigres UANL scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while Pumas UNAM keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Pumas UNAM scoring profile: strong

Pumas UNAM scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Tigres UANL keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 matches).

46Goals scored (season)26
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
24Goals conceded (season)29
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
2.92Average goals in match2.89
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
6Goals scored (last 5)10
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal84%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
46%2 goals26%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
21%3 goals16%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
17%4 goals11%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal84%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
25%2 goals37%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
17%3 goals26%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
0%4 goals5%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time21%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
33%Scored in both halves21%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tigres UANL is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Tigres UANL · 1.32 pts / match - Pumas UNAM

Tigres UANL - half-time state
29% leading63% draw8% trailing
Pumas UNAM - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.32
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.16
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
67%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
54%No goal before half-time58%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

After half-time (2nd half)

1.88Points per match (2nd half)1.05
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
1.79Average goals (2nd half)1.74
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
50%Clean sheet after half-time32%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM
25%No goal after half-time37%
Tigres UANLPumas UNAM

Tigres UANL - second-half results

54% W25% D21% L
36
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pumas UNAM - second-half results

21% W42% D37% L
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tigres UANL - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pumas UNAM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tigres UANL
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
7
4
31-45
11
4
46-60
10
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Pumas UNAM
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
4
6
46-60
2
7
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.91
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tigres UANL

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Pumas UNAM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga MX).

Teams vs league

Tigres UANLLigaPumas UNAM
Average goals in match 2.922.99 2.89
Both teams scored 54%58% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%55% 47%
Clean sheets 42%24% 16%
Goal before half-time 54%72% 58%
Goal after half-time 92%78% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pumas UNAMGoalRobert MoralesAssist: Jorge Ruvalcaba
  2. Tigres UANLYellow cardJuan José Sánchez Purata
  3. Pumas UNAMYellow cardKeylor Navas Gamboa
  4. Pumas UNAMYellow cardCesar Garza Cantu
  5. Tigres UANLSubstitutionOn: André-Pierre GignacOff: Nicolás Alejandro Ibáñez
  6. Pumas UNAMYellow cardJorge Ruvalcaba
  7. Pumas UNAMSubstitutionOn: Alan MedinaOff: Jorge Ruvalcaba
  8. Tigres UANLYellow cardAndré-Pierre Gignac
  9. Pumas UNAMYellow cardÁlvaro Anyiver Angulo Mosquera
  10. Tigres UANLYellow cardJoaquim Henrique Pereira
  11. Pumas UNAMYellow cardÁlvaro Anyiver Angulo Mosquera

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jesus Rafael Lopez ValleMatches officiated: 12
6.42Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 225%Home wins33%Draws42%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tigres UANL 0 - 1 - 0 Pumas UNAM. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Club Universidad Nacional
1 : 1
Tigres UANL

FAQ

What was the result of Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM?

The Liga MX match finished Tigres UANL 0:1 Pumas UNAM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM?

Tigres UANL score 1.92 goals per game on average and Pumas UNAM 1.37. The Liga MX average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Tigres UANL's matches and 74% of Pumas UNAM's.

What form are Tigres UANL and Pumas UNAM in?

Over the last 5 games Tigres UANL have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Pumas UNAM 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tigres UANL vs Pumas UNAM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.