Hungary - NB IIData current as of 22 July 2026

Tiszakécske vs Videoton: match statistics

Tiszakécske crest
Tiszakécske
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Videoton crest
Videoton
130%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Videoton show significantly better form in their last five matches, earning 2.4 points per game and recording a four-game winning streak, while Tiszakécske are managing just 1 point per game with an LWDDL form. The hosts have a negative goal difference (-2) at their own stadium and concede an average of 1.4 goals per home game, indicating defensive fragility. Videoton, despite poorer away results (20% win rate), have recently shown a marked improvement with an LWWWW form, scoring 10 goals in their last five fixtures. The difference in attacking quality (xG For: 1.61 vs 1.44) is marginal, but the visitors' superior form and confidence strongly support their victory. Given the average of 2.6-2.9 goals per match for both teams, we expect an open game with Videoton coming out on top.

Tiszakécske vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tiszakécske play Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Tiszakécske: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Videoton: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tiszakécske scores 1.23 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Videoton scores 1.23 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tiszakécske 63%, Videoton 47%. Over 2.5: Tiszakécske 47%, Videoton 37%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Tiszakécske has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.38. Tiszakécske: 10.2 shots per match, Videoton: 9.9.

Match halves

Tiszakécske: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.93. Videoton: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Tiszakécske: 76-90+ (12 goals). Videoton: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Videoton show significantly better form in their last five matches, earning 2.4 points per game and recording a four-game winning streak, while Tiszakécske are managing just 1 point per game with an LWDDL form. The hosts have a negative goal difference (-2) at their own stadium and concede an average of 1.4 goals per home game, indicating defensive fragility. Videoton, despite poorer away results (20% win rate), have recently shown a marked improvement with an LWWWW form, scoring 10 goals in their last five fixtures. The difference in attacking quality (xG For: 1.61 vs 1.44) is marginal, but the visitors' superior form and confidence strongly support their victory. Given the average of 2.6-2.9 goals per match for both teams, we expect an open game with Videoton coming out on top.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Shots-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Shots on target-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
0xG0
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Corners-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
0Dangerous attacks0
TiszakécskeVideoton
-1Fouls-1
TiszakécskeVideoton
3Cards1
TiszakécskeVideoton

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TiszakécskeVideoton
1.23Goals scored / match1.23
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.47Goals conceded / match1.1
TiszakécskeVideoton
45%Average possession45%
TiszakécskeVideoton
3.23Shots on target / match3.4
TiszakécskeVideoton

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.2Shots per match9.93
TiszakécskeVideoton
3.23Shots on target3.4
TiszakécskeVideoton
12.1%Shot conversion12.4%
TiszakécskeVideoton
45%Possession45%
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.59xG for1.38
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.44xG against1.42
TiszakécskeVideoton

Shooting quality

Tiszakécske: Counter-attackingVideoton: Counter-attacking
TiszakécskeVideoton
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tiszakécske is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Tiszakécske · 0.6 pts / match - Videoton

Tiszakécske
LLWWL
Season result split
33% W30% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Videoton
WLLLL
Season result split
33% W30% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Videoton is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Tiszakécske · 1.1 goals / match - Videoton

Tiszakécske scoring profile: very strong

Tiszakécske scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Videoton scoring profile: very strong

Videoton scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Tiszakécske keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).

37Goals scored (season)37
TiszakécskeVideoton
44Goals conceded (season)33
TiszakécskeVideoton
2.7Average goals in match2.33
TiszakécskeVideoton
6Goals scored (last 5)5
TiszakécskeVideoton
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
TiszakécskeVideoton

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal73%
TiszakécskeVideoton
27%2 goals27%
TiszakécskeVideoton
10%3 goals10%
TiszakécskeVideoton
3%4 goals7%
TiszakécskeVideoton

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal67%
TiszakécskeVideoton
37%2 goals30%
TiszakécskeVideoton
17%3 goals13%
TiszakécskeVideoton
10%4 goals0%
TiszakécskeVideoton

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time17%
TiszakécskeVideoton
3%BTTS in both halves0%
TiszakécskeVideoton
20%Scored in both halves23%
TiszakécskeVideoton

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
TiszakécskeVideoton
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
TiszakécskeVideoton
60%BTTS - last 540%
TiszakécskeVideoton

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
TiszakécskeVideoton
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
TiszakécskeVideoton
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
TiszakécskeVideoton

2nd half

97%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
TiszakécskeVideoton
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
TiszakécskeVideoton
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
TiszakécskeVideoton

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Videoton is 84% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - Tiszakécske · 1.6 pts / match - Videoton

Tiszakécske - half-time state
17% leading37% draw47% trailing
Videoton - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)1.6
TiszakécskeVideoton
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.67
TiszakécskeVideoton
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.1
TiszakécskeVideoton
47%Clean sheet before half-time63%
TiszakécskeVideoton
73%No goal before half-time47%
TiszakécskeVideoton

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)1.2
TiszakécskeVideoton
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
TiszakécskeVideoton
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
TiszakécskeVideoton
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.23
TiszakécskeVideoton
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
TiszakécskeVideoton
23%No goal after half-time57%
TiszakécskeVideoton

Tiszakécske - second-half results

57% W13% R30% P
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Videoton - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
48
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tiszakécske - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Videoton - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tiszakécske
ScoredConceded
2
12
0-15
1
7
16-30
6
5
31-45
11
8
46-60
5
5
61-75
12
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Videoton
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
10
3
31-45
12
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
0
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+99%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tiszakécske

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Videoton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

TiszakécskeLigaVideoton
Average goals in match 2.702.51 2.33
Both teams scored 63%48% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%45% 37%
Clean sheets 23%29% 33%
Goal before half-time 67%70% 73%
Goal after half-time 97%80% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tiszakécske 0 - 0 - 1 Videoton. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Videoton FC Fehérvár
5 : 0
Duna Aszfalt TVSE Tiszakécske

FAQ

What was the result of Tiszakécske vs Videoton?

The NB II match finished Tiszakécske 1:1 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tiszakécske vs Videoton?

Tiszakécske score 1.23 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.23. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Tiszakécske's matches and 47% of Videoton's.

What form are Tiszakécske and Videoton in?

Over the last 5 games Tiszakécske have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Videoton 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tiszakécske vs Videoton?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.