Tiszakécske vs Videoton: match statistics
Videoton show significantly better form in their last five matches, earning 2.4 points per game and recording a four-game winning streak, while Tiszakécske are managing just 1 point per game with an LWDDL form. The hosts have a negative goal difference (-2) at their own stadium and concede an average of 1.4 goals per home game, indicating defensive fragility. Videoton, despite poorer away results (20% win rate), have recently shown a marked improvement with an LWWWW form, scoring 10 goals in their last five fixtures. The difference in attacking quality (xG For: 1.61 vs 1.44) is marginal, but the visitors' superior form and confidence strongly support their victory. Given the average of 2.6-2.9 goals per match for both teams, we expect an open game with Videoton coming out on top.
Tiszakécske vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tiszakécske played Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The match was played on 14 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Tiszakécske: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Videoton: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tiszakécske scores 1.14 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Videoton scores 1.29 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tiszakécske 62%, Videoton 43%. Over 2.5: Tiszakécske 48%, Videoton 38%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Tiszakécske has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.42. Tiszakécske: 11.3 shots per match, Videoton: 11.3.
Match halves
Tiszakécske: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.86. Videoton: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Tiszakécske: 46-60 (8 goals). Videoton: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB II: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Videoton show significantly better form in their last five matches, earning 2.4 points per game and recording a four-game winning streak, while Tiszakécske are managing just 1 point per game with an LWDDL form. The hosts have a negative goal difference (-2) at their own stadium and concede an average of 1.4 goals per home game, indicating defensive fragility. Videoton, despite poorer away results (20% win rate), have recently shown a marked improvement with an LWWWW form, scoring 10 goals in their last five fixtures. The difference in attacking quality (xG For: 1.61 vs 1.44) is marginal, but the visitors' superior form and confidence strongly support their victory. Given the average of 2.6-2.9 goals per match for both teams, we expect an open game with Videoton coming out on top.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tiszakécske | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Videoton is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Tiszakécske · 3 pts / match - Videoton
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Videoton is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - Tiszakécske · 1.29 goals / match - Videoton
Videoton is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.52 goals / match - Tiszakécske · 1.05 goals / match - Videoton
Tiszakécske scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).
Videoton scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Tiszakécske keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tiszakécske
Over / Under - Videoton
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Videoton is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / match - Tiszakécske · 1.52 pts / match - Videoton
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tiszakécske - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Videoton - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tiszakécske
Videoton
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Tiszakécske | Liga | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.67 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 48% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 45% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 29% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 71% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 80% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tiszakécske 0 - 0 - 1 Videoton. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tiszakécske vs Videoton?
The NB II match finished Tiszakécske 1:1 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tiszakécske vs Videoton?
Tiszakécske score 1.14 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.29. The NB II average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Tiszakécske's matches and 43% of Videoton's.
What form are Tiszakécske and Videoton in?
Over the last 5 games Tiszakécske have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Videoton 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tiszakécske vs Videoton?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.