Toronto II vs Connecticut United: match statistics
Toronto II vs Connecticut United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Toronto II played Connecticut United in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: BMO Training Ground & Academy. Final score: 2:4.
Current form
Toronto II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Connecticut United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Toronto II scores 1.69 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Connecticut United scores 1.33 and concedes 1.83. League average: 3.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Toronto II 54%, Connecticut United 75%. Over 2.5: Toronto II 69%, Connecticut United 75%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Connecticut United has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.29. Toronto II: 10.5 shots per match, Connecticut United: 13.8.
Match halves
Toronto II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.00. Connecticut United: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Toronto II: 31-45+ (5 goals). Connecticut United: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Toronto II holds a clear home advantage: 67% home wins, averaging 1.83 goals scored and 1.33 conceded per home match. In the last 5 home games the hosts scored 9 goals, recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, and average 2 points per game, while Connecticut has 6 goals and 1 point per game over that period. The visitors create more chances (avg. 14.5 shots and 6.13 on target per away game, xG 1.79 vs hosts' xG 1.37) but are less efficient (12% vs 17%) and have a higher average goals conceded. Connecticut concedes 1.88 goals away and has registered no clean sheets on the road (0%), whereas Toronto concedes only 1.33 at home and has a lower loss rate (17%). Considering the hosts' superior efficiency (1.83 vs 1.75 goals), form advantage (PPG 2 vs 1) and the visitors' weaker defense, I assess the probabilities as: 60% Toronto win, 25% draw, 15% Connecticut win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes at 82% probability because Connecticut has a seasonal BTTS of 88% versus Toronto II’s 50%, while the league average BTTS is 61%, indicating a strong tendency for both sides to score. Visitors average 1.75 goals away, while Toronto concedes 1.75 goals at home on average, and Connecticut has no clean sheets on the road (0%), so an away goal is highly likely. Home side scores only 0.5 goals per game on the season at home, but in the last 5 matches Toronto averages 1.8 goals and has 80% BTTS in those five games, showing offensive improvement and increasing the chance of a home goal. xG is 1.56 for Toronto versus 1.79 for Connecticut, and the visitors’ shot conversion is 12% versus 4% for the home team, with average shots on target 6.13 vs 5.0, which further supports an exchange of goals. The sum of these indicators (high seasonal BTTS for visitors 88%, zero clean sheets 0%, and recent form 80% for home and 60% for visitors) justifies the selection of Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I get expected 1.42 goals for Toronto II and 1.42 for Connecticut United (average of home xG_for 1.56 and away xG_against 1.27, and away xG_for 1.79 and home xG_against 1.04), totaling 2.84 goals. With this total the Poisson distribution gives about a 78% chance of Over 1.5 goals, ~54% for Over 2.5 and ~32% for Over 3.5, which is consistent with the league average of 3.21 goals per game. The season share of matches with Over 2.5 goals is 50% for Toronto and 88% for Connecticut, and in the last 5 matches the hosts have 80% of games with >2.5 goals, which reinforces the Over argument. Connecticut is more offensively efficient (season 1.75 goals and 12% shot conversion) versus Toronto (0.5 goals and 4% conversion), while the share of matches with Both Teams to Score is 50% for Toronto and 88% for Connecticut (league 61%). Given the projected 2.84 goals, the clear offensive efficiency advantage for the visitors and high BTTS indicators for both teams, I recommend the Over side at the 1.5 line as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a half-time draw and an away win (X/2) based on specific figures: the home side drew at half-time in 75% of cases (3 times) and never led at the break (0%), while the visitors led at half-time in 38% of matches and have a 38% win rate this season. The visitors display superior attacking metrics: xG 1.79 versus the hosts' 1.56, shot conversion 12% vs 4%, average shots 14.5 vs 12.5 and more shots on target (6.13 vs 5.0). In the second half the visitors' advantage is even more pronounced — on average 2.13 goals in the second half vs 1.0 for the hosts, 100% of matches with at least 0.5 goals in the 2nd half for the visitors and 5 goals scored in minutes 76–90 versus 0 for the hosts, indicating dangerous finishes. Considering these numbers, I assign X/2 the highest probability (45%), followed by a full-time draw (X/X 20%) and the scenario of the visitors leading at the break and to the end (2/2 18%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Toronto II | Connecticut United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Toronto II is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Toronto II · 1 pts / match - Connecticut United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Toronto II is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.69 goals / match - Toronto II · 1.33 goals / match - Connecticut United
Toronto II is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.46 goals / match - Toronto II · 1.83 goals / match - Connecticut United
Toronto II scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Connecticut United keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).
Connecticut United scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Toronto II
Over / Under - Connecticut United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Toronto II is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / match - Toronto II · 1.17 pts / match - Connecticut United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Toronto II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Connecticut United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Toronto II
Connecticut United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Toronto II | Liga | Connecticut United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.15 | 3.23 | • 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 62% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 65% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 21% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 75% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 83% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Toronto II 1 - 0 - 0 Connecticut United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Toronto II vs Connecticut United?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Toronto II 2:4 Connecticut United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Toronto II vs Connecticut United?
Toronto II score 1.69 goals per game on average and Connecticut United 1.33. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Toronto II's matches and 75% of Connecticut United's.
What form are Toronto II and Connecticut United in?
Over the last 5 games Toronto II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Connecticut United 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Toronto II vs Connecticut United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


