United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 07 September 2026

Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II: match statistics

Toronto II crest
Toronto II
3 : 1half-time 3:0
FC Cincinnati II crest
FC Cincinnati II

Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Toronto II played FC Cincinnati II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 17 July 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Toronto II: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. FC Cincinnati II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Toronto II scores 1.50 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. FC Cincinnati II scores 0.94 and concedes 1.82. League average: 3.24 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Toronto II 56%, FC Cincinnati II 41%. Over 2.5: Toronto II 72%, FC Cincinnati II 59%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati II has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.26. Toronto II: 10.1 shots per match, FC Cincinnati II: 9.9.

Match halves

Toronto II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.89. FC Cincinnati II: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Toronto II: 61-75 (6 goals). FC Cincinnati II: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.24 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win. Toronto II have scored 27 goals this season versus 16 by FC Cincinnati II, and at home they average 1.75 goals with 4.5 shots on target, while the visitors average only 0.29 goals away and fail to score in 71% of their away matches. The hosts are also significantly more efficient in finishing chances (conversion rate 17% vs 3%) and record higher average xG (1.31 vs 1.22), indicating better quality of created opportunities. The risk for Toronto is a poor run in their last five games—they have scored 5 and conceded 16 (3.2 conceded per game on average); FC Cincinnati II in their last 5 matches have 1 win and 1 draw with 4 goals scored. Considering the seasonal attacking edge and the repeatedly documented away inefficiency of the visitors, I assign 60% probability to a home win, 20% to a draw and 20% to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Toronto II scores an average of 1.4 goals per match and has a 50% BTTS rate this season, whereas FC Cincinnati II averages only 0.29 goals per match with a 29% BTTS rate; the away side have failed to score in 71% of their matches. The difference in finishing efficiency is significant: Toronto converts 14% of shots versus Cincinnati's 3%, despite similar xG (1.32 vs 1.22), indicating the visitors create chances but rarely finish them. In the last 5 matches Toronto conceded an average of 3.2 goals (16 conceded), while Cincinnati scored 4 goals in 5 matches (0.8 avg.), so although the home side are defensively vulnerable, the visitors’ realistic goal-scoring ability is limited. Considering seasonal indicators (home BTTS 50% vs away 29%), 0% clean sheets for the visitors and 71% FTS for the away team, the signal for BTTS - No is stronger than signals for BTTS - Yes despite the league-wide BTTS level of 61%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect 1.64 goals for Toronto II and 1.43 for FC Cincinnati II, totaling 3.07 goals. The forecast is based on xG: the home side has xG_for 1.32 and concede an average xG_against 1.95 (home average after smoothing 1.64), while the visitors have xG_for 1.22 and the hosts xG_against 1.63 (visitor average 1.43). Seasonally Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of Toronto’s matches and 57% of Cincinnati’s, and in the last 5 matches Toronto produced Over 2.5 in 80% of cases and Cincinnati in 60%; the league average for Over 2.5 is 66%, which reinforces the signal for Over 2.5. Toronto averages 10.3 shots with 4.1 on target and a 14% conversion, while Cincinnati averages 9.43 shots with 3.43 on target and a 3% conversion; additionally Toronto conceded 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per game), and Cincinnati concedes 2.57 goals per game on the season, increasing goal likelihood. Given the expected 3.07 goals and strong seasonal and form-based Over indicators, I back the Over line at 1.5 as the strongest and most probable signal from the data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1 (home team leads at half-time and wins at full-time), which I assign a 37% probability. The home side scores an average of 1.4 goals per match versus 0.29 for the visitors and posts an xG of 1.32 versus 1.22, indicating an offensive edge for Toronto II. Away teams have been trailing at the break in 86% of their away matches and concede an average of 1.29 goals by half-time, while the hosts score an average of 0.3 goals before the break; this increases the likelihood of the home team holding a lead after 45 minutes. Second halves are key — the hosts have scored 4 goals in the 46–60 minute window and 4 in 61–75, while visitors have conceded 4 and 3 goals in those periods; additionally, 80% of the hosts’ matches featured more than 0.5 goals after the break and shot conversion is 14% versus 3% for the visitors, reinforcing the signal that Toronto II will maintain their lead.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
10Shots8
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
5Shots on target1
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.4xG1.09
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
7Corners6
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
58Dangerous attacks71
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
8Fouls9
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
2Cards1
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.5Goals scored / match0.94
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.94Goals conceded / match1.82
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
48%Average possession42%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
4.44Shots on target / match3.82
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.11Shots per match9.94
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
4.44Shots on target3.82
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
14.8%Shot conversion9.5%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
48%Possession42%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.26xG for1.28
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.7xG against1.76
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Shooting quality

Toronto II: Efficient finishingFC Cincinnati II: Balanced
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Toronto II
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W17% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-9
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
FC Cincinnati II
LLWDL
Season result split
24% W6% R71% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-12
0.76 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Toronto II is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Toronto II · 0.94 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II

FC Cincinnati II is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.94 goals / match - Toronto II · 1.82 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II

Toronto II scoring profile: very strong

Toronto II scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while FC Cincinnati II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

FC Cincinnati II scoring profile: strong

FC Cincinnati II scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

27Goals scored (season)16
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
35Goals conceded (season)31
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
3.44Average goals in match2.76
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
16Goals conceded (last 5)9
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal59%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
56%2 goals18%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
11%3 goals6%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
6%4 goals6%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal82%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
50%2 goals59%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
39%3 goals29%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
17%4 goals12%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time12%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
11%BTTS in both halves0%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
28%Scored in both halves6%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
60%BTTS - last 540%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
72%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
56%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Toronto II is 114% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Toronto II · 0.65 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II

Toronto II - half-time state
33% leading39% draw28% trailing
FC Cincinnati II - half-time state
12% leading29% draw59% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)0.65
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)1
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.06Average goals (1st half)1.24
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
67%Clean sheet before half-time29%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
56%No goal before half-time76%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)1
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
2.39Average goals (2nd half)1.53
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
33%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II
44%No goal after half-time59%
Toronto IIFC Cincinnati II

Toronto II - second-half results

17% W39% R44% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.1

Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati II - second-half results

24% W29% R47% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Toronto II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.02.2
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%80%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
FC Cincinnati II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Toronto II
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
4
31-45
4
7
46-60
6
6
61-75
6
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

FC Cincinnati II
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
2
6
16-30
1
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
4
5
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Toronto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

FC Cincinnati II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Toronto IILigaFC Cincinnati II
Average goals in match 3.443.24 2.76
Both teams scored 56%61% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 72%66% 59%
Clean sheets 22%22% 18%
Goal before half-time 67%75% 82%
Goal after half-time 78%84% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Toronto IIGoalAntone BossenberryAssist: Stefan Kapor
  2. FC Cincinnati IIYellow cardStiven Jimenez
  3. Toronto IIYellow cardReid Fisher
  4. Toronto IIYellow cardTheo Everton Rigopoulos-Brown
  5. Toronto IISubstitutionOn: Dekwon BarrowOff: Jahmarie Justin Kasheem Nolan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Toronto II 2 - 1 - 1 FC Cincinnati II. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.

FC Cincinnati II
5 : 0
Toronto II
Toronto FC II USL
1 : 0
FC Cincinnati II
FC Cincinnati II
1 : 1
Toronto FC II USL
FC Cincinnati II
0 : 1
Toronto FC II USL

FAQ

What was the result of Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Toronto II 3:1 FC Cincinnati II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Toronto II and FC Cincinnati II?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Toronto II won 2, FC Cincinnati II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II?

Toronto II score 1.50 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati II 0.94. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Toronto II's matches and 41% of FC Cincinnati II's.

What form are Toronto II and FC Cincinnati II in?

Over the last 5 games Toronto II have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and FC Cincinnati II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Toronto II vs FC Cincinnati II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.