United States - MLSData current as of 12 September 2026

Toronto vs Colorado Rapids: match statistics

Toronto crest
Toronto
3 : 2half-time 0:0
Colorado Rapids crest
Colorado Rapids

Toronto vs Colorado Rapids: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Toronto played Colorado Rapids in MLS (United States). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Toronto: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Colorado Rapids: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Toronto scores 1.20 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Colorado Rapids scores 2.20 and concedes 1.40. League average: 3.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Toronto 60%, Colorado Rapids 60%. Over 2.5: Toronto 60%, Colorado Rapids 60%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Colorado Rapids has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.25. Toronto: 10.4 shots per match, Colorado Rapids: 13.6.

Match halves

Toronto: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Colorado Rapids: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Toronto: 76-90+ (2 goals). Colorado Rapids: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). Toronto averages 1.5 goals scored and concedes only 1.0 at home, while Colorado on the road scores 1.67 and concedes 2.0 — roughly a 1.0-goal defensive advantage for the hosts. Toronto averages 12 shots per home match, including 6.5 on target, versus Rapids’ 11 shots and 4.67 on target away; additionally, average xG is 1.43 for Toronto versus 1.26 for the visitors, indicating higher quality chances despite lower possession (39% vs 55%). The hosts have not yet had a match without scoring at home (clean-sheet-less rate 0%), whereas Colorado failed to score in 33% of away games, increasing the likelihood Toronto will find the net at least once. Although Rapids have a better recent form over the last 5 matches (1.8 points vs Toronto’s 1.4) and a higher shot conversion (15% vs 13%), their 67% share of away losses and an average of 2.0 goals conceded demonstrate defensive instability. Overall, the home defensive edge, greater number of on-target shots (6.5 vs 4.67) and unbeaten home record (0% losses) make a Toronto victory the most probable outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates: Toronto 50% and Colorado 67%, and in the last 5 matches both record 60% BTTS, indicating a tendency toward Goal/Goal games. Toronto scores 3.0 goals seasonally (xG_for 1.95), but only 1.2 in the last 5, while Colorado has 1.67 goals seasonally (xG_for 1.26) and 2.2 in the last 5, so Colorado has been more effective offensively recently. Defensively Toronto concedes only 0.5 goals seasonally, but 1.6 in the last 5, and Colorado concedes 2.0 seasonally and 1.4 in the last 5, which together indicate increased susceptibility to goals lately. Additionally Toronto averages 7.5 shots on target versus Colorado's 4.67, and the league average BTTS is 51%, confirming the match is likely to be open. Considering the seasonal BTTS 50%/67%, the recent 60% for both teams, and the above xG and shooting stats, I price BTTS at 68% (yes) vs 32% (no) and recommend the pick: yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I back Over 1.5 as the best option: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals this season, and the league average is 3.03 goals per match. xG is 1.95 for Toronto and 1.26 for Colorado (total 3.21), which suggests roughly 3.2 expected goals and supports a minimum-2-goal scenario. Toronto averages 17.5 shots and 7.5 on target per match (conversion 17%), while Colorado has 11.0 shots and 4.67 on target (conversion 15%), so the home side clearly creates more chances. I rate Over 2.5 at about 65% because seasonally Over 2.5 is 50% for Toronto and 67% for Colorado, and in the last 5 matches both teams had 60% of games with over 2.5 goals. Over 3.5 is riskier (approx. 38%) — despite the seasonal 50%/67% figures, the combined xG 3.21 and the recent 5-match xG (1.25 for Toronto, 1.53 for Colorado) indicate exceeding 3.5 goals is less likely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Toronto has a clear offensive edge: season goals per game 3.0 versus Colorado’s 1.67, and xG 1.95 versus 1.26, indicating higher-quality created chances. The home side led at the break in 2 of 2 matches (100%), averaging 1.0 goals at half and conceding none (0.0), while Colorado led at the break in only 33% and concedes on average 1.33 goals before the interval. Toronto has a 100% home win rate and averages 3.0 points per home match, versus Colorado’s 33% win rate and 1.0 point average; additionally the hosts average 7.5 shots on target versus Colorado’s 4.67 and have a higher conversion rate of 17% versus 15%. On this basis the 1/1 (Half-Time/Full-Time: home leading at the break and winning) scenario is the strongest signal and I assign it 48% probability; realistic but weaker alternatives are X/1 at 15% and 1/X at 9%. Comebacks by Colorado are much less likely (2/1 2%) as is the away side holding their lead to the end (2/2 5%), given that Colorado concedes 2.0 goals per season on average and has the lower xG of 1.26.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
TorontoColorado Rapids
17Shots5
TorontoColorado Rapids
5Shots on target4
TorontoColorado Rapids
1.91xG0.77
TorontoColorado Rapids
7Corners4
TorontoColorado Rapids
67Dangerous attacks24
TorontoColorado Rapids
16Fouls13
TorontoColorado Rapids
5Cards7
TorontoColorado Rapids

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TorontoColorado Rapids
1.2Goals scored / match2.2
TorontoColorado Rapids
1.6Goals conceded / match1.4
TorontoColorado Rapids
43%Average possession55%
TorontoColorado Rapids
5Shots on target / match5.8
TorontoColorado Rapids

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match13.6
TorontoColorado Rapids
5Shots on target5.8
TorontoColorado Rapids
11.5%Shot conversion16.2%
TorontoColorado Rapids
43%Possession55%
TorontoColorado Rapids
1.25xG for1.54
TorontoColorado Rapids
1.41xG against1.42
TorontoColorado Rapids

Shooting quality

Toronto: BalancedColorado Rapids: Efficient finishing
TorontoColorado Rapids
Accuracy (shots on target)48%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Colorado Rapids is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Toronto · 1.8 pts / match - Colorado Rapids

Toronto
LLWDW
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Colorado Rapids
LWWLW
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Rapids is 83% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Toronto · 2.2 goals / match - Colorado Rapids

Colorado Rapids is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Toronto · 1.4 goals / match - Colorado Rapids

Toronto scoring profile: very strong

Toronto scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Rapids scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Toronto keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)11
TorontoColorado Rapids
8Goals conceded (season)7
TorontoColorado Rapids
2.8Average goals in match3.6
TorontoColorado Rapids
6Goals scored (last 5)11
TorontoColorado Rapids
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
TorontoColorado Rapids

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal80%
TorontoColorado Rapids
40%2 goals60%
TorontoColorado Rapids
0%3 goals40%
TorontoColorado Rapids
0%4 goals40%
TorontoColorado Rapids

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
TorontoColorado Rapids
40%2 goals40%
TorontoColorado Rapids
40%3 goals20%
TorontoColorado Rapids
0%4 goals0%
TorontoColorado Rapids

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time40%
TorontoColorado Rapids
20%BTTS in both halves0%
TorontoColorado Rapids
20%Scored in both halves60%
TorontoColorado Rapids

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
TorontoColorado Rapids
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TorontoColorado Rapids
60%BTTS - last 560%
TorontoColorado Rapids

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
TorontoColorado Rapids
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
TorontoColorado Rapids
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
TorontoColorado Rapids

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
TorontoColorado Rapids
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
TorontoColorado Rapids
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
TorontoColorado Rapids

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Colorado Rapids is 125% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Toronto · 1.8 pts / match - Colorado Rapids

Toronto - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing
Colorado Rapids - half-time state
60% leading0% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1.8
TorontoColorado Rapids
0.4Goals scored (1st half)1
TorontoColorado Rapids
1.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
TorontoColorado Rapids
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.8
TorontoColorado Rapids
40%Clean sheet before half-time40%
TorontoColorado Rapids
60%No goal before half-time20%
TorontoColorado Rapids

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.8
TorontoColorado Rapids
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
TorontoColorado Rapids
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
TorontoColorado Rapids
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.8
TorontoColorado Rapids
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
TorontoColorado Rapids
40%No goal after half-time40%
TorontoColorado Rapids

Toronto - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.8

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

60% W0% D40% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Toronto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Colorado Rapids - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Toronto
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Toronto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
202%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

TorontoLigaColorado Rapids
Average goals in match 2.803.03 3.60
Both teams scored 60%51% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%59% 60%
Clean sheets 20%28% 20%
Goal before half-time 80%73% 100%
Goal after half-time 80%81% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+77%
Home attack advantage
+44%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Colorado RapidsRed cardJackson Travis
  2. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Keegan RosenberryOff: Dante Sealy
  3. TorontoYellow cardWalker Dwain Zimmerman
  4. Colorado RapidsGoalPaxten Aaronson
  5. TorontoSubstitutionOn: Matheus Pereira de SouzaOff: Deandre Kerr
  6. Colorado RapidsGoalKeegan Rosenberry
  7. TorontoSubstitutionOn: Zane MonlouisOff: Walker Dwain Zimmerman
  8. Colorado RapidsYellow cardMiguel Ángel Navarro Zárate
  9. TorontoYellow cardZane Monlouis
  10. Colorado RapidsYellow cardJoshua Atencio
  11. Colorado RapidsYellow cardMiguel Ángel Navarro Zárate
  12. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Alexis Castillo ManyomaOff: Joshua Atencio
  13. Colorado RapidsGoalZack Steffen
  14. TorontoYellow cardRichmond Mamah Laryea
  15. Colorado RapidsYellow cardNoah Cobb
  16. Colorado RapidsYellow cardHamzat Basit Ojediran

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Toronto vs Colorado Rapids?

The MLS match finished Toronto 3:2 Colorado Rapids. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Toronto vs Colorado Rapids?

Toronto score 1.20 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids 2.20. The MLS average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Toronto's matches and 60% of Colorado Rapids's.

What form are Toronto and Colorado Rapids in?

Over the last 5 games Toronto have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Colorado Rapids 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Toronto vs Colorado Rapids?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.