Toronto vs Philadelphia Union: match statistics
Toronto vs Philadelphia Union: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Toronto played Philadelphia Union in MLS (United States). The match was played on 22 April 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
Toronto: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Philadelphia Union: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Toronto scores 1.63 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Philadelphia Union scores 0.75 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.18 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Toronto 75%, Philadelphia Union 63%. Over 2.5: Toronto 63%, Philadelphia Union 63%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Philadelphia Union has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.47. Toronto: 12.1 shots per match, Philadelphia Union: 14.5.
Match halves
Toronto: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 1.38. Philadelphia Union: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Toronto: 76-90+ (6 goals). Philadelphia Union: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.18 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Toronto shows better form and efficiency — 10 goals in the last 5 matches versus Philadelphia’s 5, and at home they score 2.0 goals per game compared to Union’s 1.0 on the road. The hosts average 6.4 shots on target per home match versus visitors’ 3.75 on the road; Toronto’s conversion rate is 14% against Philadelphia’s 7%, and xG for the hosts is 1.67 versus 1.60 for Union, indicating a quality edge for Toronto. Defensively the margins are smaller — Toronto concedes 1.6 goals on average at home while Philadelphia concedes 1.75 away, but Union suffer 75% losses on the road and have 25% of away games without scoring, which weakens their prospects. Additionally Toronto remain unbeaten at home (0 home defeats) and average 1.8 points per game over the last 5 matches, whereas Philadelphia average only 1.0 point per game in that period, so the hosts are favored. I predict a Toronto win, however given that the hosts draw 60% of their home matches a draw remains a realistic alternative.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams produce comparable xG: Toronto 1.69 vs Philadelphia 1.60, with xG against 1.14 and 1.03 respectively, meaning both sides create around 1.5–1.7 xG while being exposed to about 1.0–1.1 opponent xG, so goals from both teams are likely. Across the season Toronto scores on average 0.5 goals (13 total) and concedes 1.25 (14), while Philadelphia scores 1.0 (6) and concedes 1.75 (12); in the last 5 matches Toronto averages 2.0 goals and 100% BTTS, and Philadelphia 1.0 goals and 80% BTTS. Season BTTS rates are 50% for Toronto and 75% for Philadelphia, with the league BTTS level at 57%; additionally Philadelphia has 0% clean sheets this season versus 25% for Toronto, which reinforces the expectation of goals at both ends. Both teams register identical average shots (14.5) and shots on target (3.75), and the efficiency gap (Toronto 3% conversion vs Philadelphia 7%) indicates Philadelphia better converts chances, so BTTS is more probable. Given the 100% and 80% BTTS in the last 5, season figures 50%/75% and league 57%, with a weighted estimate (0.4*100 + 0.3*80 + 0.1*50 + 0.1*75 + 0.1*57 = 82.2%), I estimate BTTS - Yes at 82% vs No 18% and recommend a Yes bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: (1.69 + 1.03)/2 = 1.36 for Toronto and (1.60 + 1.14)/2 = 1.37 for Philadelphia, yielding a combined 2.73 expected goals. Seasonally, >1.5 occurs in 50% of home matches and 75% of away matches, and >2.5 occurs in 50% and 75% respectively; league average goals is 3.18, which supports a multi-goal scenario. In the last 5 matches Toronto averages 2.0 goals (10 goals in 5 matches), Philadelphia 1.0 goal (5 goals in 5 matches), and both teams have 60% of games with >2.5 goals in that period; hosts also have 100% BTTS, visitors 80%. Considering the estimated 2.73 goals and the cited stats (50%/75% for >1.5 and 60% >2.5 in last 5), I estimate Over 1.5 at ~86% and Over 2.5 at 63%. Over 3.5 is unlikely (~22%) given seasonal >3.5 rates of 0% (hosts) and 25% (guests); therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is X/2 (draw at half-time, away win at full-time). Toronto were level at the break in 75% of their home matches (3 of 4) and averaged only 0.25 goals by half-time, while Philadelphia averaged 0.0 goals at half-time but are significantly more active after the break — they average 1.0 goals in second halves and 1.75 goals as a second-half average and earn 1.25 points after the break. Both teams have similar xG: 1.69 for Toronto versus 1.60 for Philadelphia, yet the hosts convert chances at only 3.0% versus 7.0% for the visitors, which reduces the hosts’ chance of holding a lead. Additionally, the visitors have a positive second-half goal balance (+1.0) and have gained more points after the break (5 compared to Toronto’s 2); therefore I forecast a draw at half-time and a Philadelphia victory after 90 minutes.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Toronto | Philadelphia Union | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Toronto is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Toronto · 0.8 pts / match - Philadelphia Union
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Toronto is 117% better for: goals scored per match.
1.63 goals / match - Toronto · 0.75 goals / match - Philadelphia Union
Philadelphia Union is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.75 goals / match - Toronto · 1.5 goals / match - Philadelphia Union
Toronto scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Philadelphia Union keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).
Philadelphia Union scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Toronto keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Toronto
Over / Under - Philadelphia Union
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Toronto is 97% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.75 pts / match - Toronto · 0.38 pts / match - Philadelphia Union
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Toronto - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Philadelphia Union - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Toronto
Philadelphia Union
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Toronto | Liga | Philadelphia Union | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.38 | 3.18 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 58% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 63% | 64% | • 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 24% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 81% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Toronto vs Philadelphia Union?
The MLS match finished Toronto 3:3 Philadelphia Union. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Toronto vs Philadelphia Union?
Toronto score 1.63 goals per game on average and Philadelphia Union 0.75. The MLS average is 3.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Toronto's matches and 63% of Philadelphia Union's.
What form are Toronto and Philadelphia Union in?
Over the last 5 games Toronto have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Philadelphia Union 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Toronto vs Philadelphia Union?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Toronto vs Philadelphia Union: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


