Tottenham Hotspur vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics
Tottenham Hotspur is in very poor home form with only 13% wins at their own stadium and a goal difference of -7, making them one of the weakest home teams in the league. Nottingham Forest shows slightly better away effectiveness with 27% wins, although they also have a negative goal difference (-9). Both teams have similar xG statistics (Tottenham 1.40 vs 1.25 Forest) and an identical shot accuracy (10%), suggesting balanced offensive strength. The form from the last five matches is comparable – Tottenham has earned 0.8 points per match, Forest 1.0 point, indicating a slight advantage for the visitors. Considering the hosts' poor form in home matches and Forest's relatively solid away performances, the most likely scenario seems to be a draw, although Tottenham's slight home advantage and Forest's marginally better form create a very balanced situation.
Tottenham Hotspur vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tottenham Hotspur played Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The match was played on 22 March 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Tottenham Hotspur: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Nottingham Forest: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tottenham Hotspur scores 1.33 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Nottingham Forest scores 0.93 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tottenham Hotspur 63%, Nottingham Forest 40%. Over 2.5: Tottenham Hotspur 67%, Nottingham Forest 50%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Nottingham Forest has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.30. Tottenham Hotspur: 11.1 shots per match, Nottingham Forest: 12.8.
Match halves
Tottenham Hotspur: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Nottingham Forest: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Tottenham Hotspur: 76-90+ (11 goals). Nottingham Forest: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tottenham Hotspur is in very poor home form with only 13% wins at their own stadium and a goal difference of -7, making them one of the weakest home teams in the league. Nottingham Forest shows slightly better away effectiveness with 27% wins, although they also have a negative goal difference (-9). Both teams have similar xG statistics (Tottenham 1.40 vs 1.25 Forest) and an identical shot accuracy (10%), suggesting balanced offensive strength. The form from the last five matches is comparable – Tottenham has earned 0.8 points per match, Forest 1.0 point, indicating a slight advantage for the visitors. Considering the hosts' poor form in home matches and Forest's relatively solid away performances, the most likely scenario seems to be a draw, although Tottenham's slight home advantage and Forest's marginally better form create a very balanced situation.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tottenham Hotspur | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nottingham Forest is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Tottenham Hotspur · 0.6 pts / match - Nottingham Forest
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tottenham Hotspur is 43% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Tottenham Hotspur · 0.93 goals / match - Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.57 goals / match - Tottenham Hotspur · 1.43 goals / match - Nottingham Forest
Tottenham Hotspur scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
Nottingham Forest scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Tottenham Hotspur keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tottenham Hotspur
Over / Under - Nottingham Forest
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tottenham Hotspur is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.9 pts / match - Tottenham Hotspur · 0.8 pts / match - Nottingham Forest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tottenham Hotspur - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Nottingham Forest - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tottenham Hotspur
Nottingham Forest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Tottenham Hotspur | Liga | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.90 | 2.74 | ▼ 2.37 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 56% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 26% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 70% | • 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 79% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tottenham Hotspur 0 - 0 - 1 Nottingham Forest. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tottenham Hotspur vs Nottingham Forest?
The Premier League match finished Tottenham Hotspur 0:3 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tottenham Hotspur vs Nottingham Forest?
Tottenham Hotspur score 1.33 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 0.93. The Premier League average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Tottenham Hotspur's matches and 40% of Nottingham Forest's.
What form are Tottenham Hotspur and Nottingham Forest in?
Over the last 5 games Tottenham Hotspur have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tottenham Hotspur vs Nottingham Forest?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tottenham Hotspur vs Nottingham Forest: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.