Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

TPS vs HJK: match statistics

TPS crest
TPS
1 : 0half-time 0:0
HJK crest
HJK

TPS vs HJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

TPS played HJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 8 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

TPS: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. HJK: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

TPS scores 1.60 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. HJK scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: TPS 80%, HJK 33%. Over 2.5: TPS 40%, HJK 33%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

TPS has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.27. TPS: 12.6 shots per match, HJK: 10.2.

Match halves

TPS: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.00. HJK: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

TPS: 76-90+ (3 goals). HJK: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TPS has a clear edge in chance creation: at home they average 12 shots and 4.67 on target with average xG 1.47, while HJK away records 7.67 shots, 3 on target and xG 1.01. Both teams average 1.67 goals scored and concede 0.67, but TPS generates about 56% more shots and 0.46 higher xG, translating into a greater number of high-quality chances. HJK compensates for fewer opportunities with higher efficiency – their shot conversion is 22% versus TPS’s 14% – so a lower volume of shots can still yield away goals. In the last 5 matches TPS scored 8 and conceded 5 (PPG 1.8), while HJK scored 6 and conceded 3 (PPG 1.6), giving a slight points advantage to the hosts. Based on this I predict a TPS win, assigning the hosts 55% probability, a draw 25% and an HJK away win 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

TPS at home averages 1.33 goals scored and concedes 0.33 per game season-to-date, but in the last 5 matches they score 1.6 and concede 1.0, resulting in BTTS - Yes in 80% of those fixtures. HJK seasonally scores 1.67 and concedes 0.67, with BTTS occurring in 67% of their season matches; in HJK’s last 5 games they record 1.2 goals and 0.6 conceded with 40% BTTS. From chance quality, TPS generates xG 1.53, which is close to the xG HJK concedes away (1.55), while HJK’s away xG is 1.01 versus xG against TPS 1.21. Additionally, HJK shows high shot conversion at 22% on an average of 7.67 shots. TPS averages 12.67 shots and 4.67 on target; combining this with HJK’s seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and TPS’s last-5 form (80% BTTS) the balance shifts toward Goal/Goal. Although TPS records seasonally 67% clean sheets at home, the strongest signal from the data indicates a 65% probability for BTTS - Yes and 35% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Averaging offensive and defensive xG yields expected goals of 1.54 for TPS (1.53 attacking xG) and 1.11 for HJK (1.01 attacking xG), totaling 2.65 goals (1.53 vs 1.55 and 1.01 vs 1.21 when accounting for opponent xG). With a mean of 2.65, the Poisson distribution implies roughly a 74% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~49% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~27% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal data confirm HJK’s propensity for matches with more than 1.5 goals (100% of matches), while TPS has 33% of matches over 1.5; both teams have 33% of matches over 2.5 and 0% over 3.5, which explains the moderate probability for Over 2.5 and low probability for Over 3.5. TPS averages 12.67 shots with 4.67 on target, HJK 7.67 with 3.0 on target, and HJK has higher shot conversion 22% vs 11% for TPS, so despite fewer shots HJK can convert chances into goals. Consequently, the strongest and most justified signal from the data is backing the Over line at 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

TPS led at the break in 2 of 3 matches (67%), while HJK led in 1 of 3 (33%), indicating a clear home advantage in the first 45 minutes. TPS posts a higher xG (1.53 vs 1.01) and averages more shots (12.67 vs 7.67) and shots on target (4.67 vs 3.0), confirming superior chance creation. The hosts concede only 0.33 goals per game on average and have 67% clean sheets this season, whereas HJK concedes 0.67 and has 33% clean sheets, so the risk of TPS surrendering a lead is relatively low. Although HJK has higher shot conversion (22% vs 11%) and scores more on average in second halves (1.0 vs 0.67), TPS’s higher xG and higher average points at half-time (2.0 for TPS vs 1.33 for HJK) favor the scenario of TPS leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
TPSHJK
5Shots22
TPSHJK
4Shots on target4
TPSHJK
0.8xG2.31
TPSHJK
4Corners11
TPSHJK
27Dangerous attacks89
TPSHJK
13Fouls11
TPSHJK
2Cards1
TPSHJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match1.5
TPSHJK
1Goals conceded / match0.5
TPSHJK
49%Average possession49%
TPSHJK
4.8Shots on target / match3.83
TPSHJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.6Shots per match10.17
TPSHJK
4.8Shots on target3.83
TPSHJK
12.7%Shot conversion14.8%
TPSHJK
49%Possession49%
TPSHJK
1.55xG for1.27
TPSHJK
1.26xG against1.38
TPSHJK

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedHJK: Efficient finishing
TPSHJK
Accuracy (shots on target)38%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TPS is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - TPS · 1.6 pts / match - HJK

TPS
DWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W60% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
HJK
LWDDW
Season result split
50% W33% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 away
1-2-0
WDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TPS is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - TPS · 1.5 goals / match - HJK

HJK is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - TPS · 0.5 goals / match - HJK

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

HJK scoring profile: very strong

HJK scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)9
TPSHJK
5Goals conceded (season)3
TPSHJK
2.6Average goals in match2
TPSHJK
8Goals scored (last 5)6
TPSHJK
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
TPSHJK

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal83%
TPSHJK
60%2 goals33%
TPSHJK
0%3 goals33%
TPSHJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSHJK

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal50%
TPSHJK
20%2 goals0%
TPSHJK
0%3 goals0%
TPSHJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSHJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time17%
TPSHJK
20%BTTS in both halves0%
TPSHJK
60%Scored in both halves33%
TPSHJK

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
TPSHJK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
TPSHJK
80%BTTS - last 540%
TPSHJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
TPSHJK
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
TPSHJK
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TPSHJK

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
TPSHJK
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
TPSHJK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TPSHJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TPS - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
HJK - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.67
TPSHJK
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.67
TPSHJK
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
TPSHJK
1Average goals (1st half)1.17
TPSHJK
60%Clean sheet before half-time50%
TPSHJK
40%No goal before half-time33%
TPSHJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)2
TPSHJK
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
TPSHJK
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0
TPSHJK
1.6Average goals (2nd half)0.83
TPSHJK
40%Clean sheet after half-time100%
TPSHJK
0%No goal after half-time50%
TPSHJK

TPS - second-half results

40% W60% R0% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

HJK - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
HJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

TPS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

HJK
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.88
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaHJK
Average goals in match 2.602.34 2.00
Both teams scored 80%50% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%38% 33%
Clean sheets 20%28% 50%
Goal before half-time 80%78% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%78% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TPSYellow cardPau Juvanteny Costa
  2. HJKSubstitutionOn: Teemu PukkiOff: Martin Kirilov
  3. TPSSubstitutionOn: Miika KauppilaOff: Elmer Vauhkonen
  4. HJKYellow cardPyry Mentu
  5. HJKSubstitutionOn: David EzehOff: Mads Borchers
  6. TPSSubstitutionOn: Akim SairinenOff: Eetu Turkki
  7. TPSYellow cardEetu Turkki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of TPS vs HJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 1:0 HJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs HJK?

TPS score 1.60 goals per game on average and HJK 1.50. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 80% of TPS's matches and 33% of HJK's.

What form are TPS and HJK in?

Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and HJK 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs HJK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for TPS vs HJK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.