TPS vs KuPS: match statistics
TPS vs KuPS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
TPS play KuPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 17 June 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
TPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. KuPS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
TPS scores 1.25 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. KuPS scores 1.81 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: TPS 56%, KuPS 63%. Over 2.5: TPS 50%, KuPS 44%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
KuPS has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.45. TPS: 11.7 shots per match, KuPS: 16.1.
Match halves
TPS: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69. KuPS: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
TPS: 76-90+ (6 goals). KuPS: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back TPS to win because at home they have an 80% win rate in their last five home matches (sequence 'wwdww'), concede only 0.4 goals per game on average with 60% clean sheets, despite an average xG against at home of 1.82. The hosts score 1.4 goals per home game on average and have 0% goalless matches (they always score), while KuPS averages 1.2 goals per away match and fail to score in 20% of away fixtures. The visitors do create more chances: on average 14 shots and 5 on target away with 62% possession, and their away xG is 1.73 versus TPS’s 1.13 home xG. In practice KuPS convert only 9% in away matches and have 0% clean sheets, whereas TPS have a 17% conversion rate at home, which favors the hosts in terms of finishing quality and defensive reliability. Considering TPS’s 80% home wins versus KuPS’s 20% away wins and recent average points per game of 0.6 for TPS and 1.8 for KuPS, I assign 55% probability to a home win, 30% to a draw and 15% to an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| TPS | KuPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KuPS is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - TPS · 2.6 pts / match - KuPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KuPS is 45% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - TPS · 1.81 goals / match - KuPS
KuPS is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.19 goals / match - TPS · 0.94 goals / match - KuPS
TPS scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
KuPS scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — TPS
Over / Under — KuPS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KuPS is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - TPS · 1.81 pts / match - KuPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
TPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
KuPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
TPS
KuPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| TPS | Liga | KuPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.44 | 2.67 | • 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 28% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 75% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of TPS vs KuPS?
The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 1:2 KuPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs KuPS?
TPS score 1.25 goals per game on average and KuPS 1.81. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of TPS's matches and 63% of KuPS's.
What form are TPS and KuPS in?
Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and KuPS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs KuPS?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for TPS vs KuPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.