TPS vs Lahti: match statistics
TPS vs Lahti: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
TPS play Lahti in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 10 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
TPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Lahti: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
TPS scores 1.25 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Lahti scores 1.25 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: TPS 56%, Lahti 44%. Over 2.5: TPS 50%, Lahti 31%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
TPS has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.43. TPS: 11.7 shots per match, Lahti: 12.5.
Match halves
TPS: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69. Lahti: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
TPS: 76-90+ (6 goals). Lahti: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 0-4-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 75%.
Match description
Lahti holds a clear statistical advantage — in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 6 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while TPS scored 3 goals and averages only 0.4 points per game. TPS’s defense is in poor form: the hosts conceded 10 goals in their last 5 fixtures (2.0 goals per game), whereas Lahti conceded 6 (1.2 per game). Lahti generates more chances: on the road they average 7 shots and 2 on target with a 14% conversion rate (translating to roughly 1 goal), while available home stats for TPS show 0 shots on target per game. Lahti’s average away xG is 0.77 against an xG conceded of 1.29, indicating the visitors create moderately valuable chances and can convert them; season-long figures further favor Lahti (4th vs 8th for TPS) and show 100% wins and 100% clean sheets on the road in season comparisons. Based on the goal difference (6 vs 3), average points (1.4 vs 0.4) and superiority in attacking situations, I predict a Lahti victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| TPS | Lahti | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lahti is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - TPS · 2.2 pts / match - Lahti
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lahti is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.19 goals / match - TPS · 0.94 goals / match - Lahti
TPS scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
Lahti scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — TPS
Over / Under — Lahti
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lahti is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - TPS · 1.56 pts / match - Lahti
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
TPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Lahti - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
TPS
Lahti
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| TPS | Liga | Lahti | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.44 | 2.67 | ▼ 2.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 28% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 75% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 78% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): TPS 0 - 4 - 0 Lahti. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of TPS vs Lahti?
The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 2:1 Lahti. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between TPS and Lahti?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches TPS won 0, Lahti won 0 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs Lahti?
TPS score 1.25 goals per game on average and Lahti 1.25. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of TPS's matches and 44% of Lahti's.
What form are TPS and Lahti in?
Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lahti 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs Lahti?
The statistical background for TPS vs Lahti — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.