Finland - VeikkausliigaVeritas StadionData current as of 09 September 2026

TPS vs SJK: match statistics

TPS crest
TPS
0 : 0half-time 0:0
SJK crest
SJK

TPS vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

TPS played SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 8 September 2026. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

TPS: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. SJK: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

TPS scores 1.27 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. SJK scores 1.14 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: TPS 55%, SJK 55%. Over 2.5: TPS 45%, SJK 55%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.45. TPS: 11.8 shots per match, SJK: 13.4.

Match halves

TPS: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.68. SJK: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

TPS: 76-90+ (9 goals). SJK: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TPS remain unbeaten in their last five matches, scoring 8 goals and conceding just 3, while SJK have won only once during that period. At home, the hosts win 64% of their matches, average 1.64 goals scored and concede just 0.82, whereas SJK win only 9% of their away fixtures. The visitors have a clear efficiency problem on the road: they average 0.82 goals, fail to score in 55% of matches and convert just 7% of their shots, compared with 15% for TPS. TPS keep a clean sheet in 55% of their home matches, while SJK lose 55% of their away games and concede an average of 1.64 goals there. Although both teams have similar xG figures—1.38 for TPS and 1.34 for SJK—the hosts’ advantage in current form, chance conversion and home results clearly points to a TPS victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

TPS has a high seasonal rate of matches in which both teams score, at 64%, but SJK achieves only 45% in this regard, falling to just 40% in their last five matches. The strongest argument against BTTS - Yes is the visitors’ limited attacking efficiency: they score an average of 0.82 goals per match, have failed to score in 55% of their appearances, and convert only 7% of their shots. TPS have improved defensively over their last five league fixtures, conceding just 0.6 goals per match, or 3 goals in total, despite opponents creating chances worth an average of 1.84 xG against them. The hosts should create opportunities, given their seasonal xG of 1.79 and SJK’s average of 1.64 goals conceded, but it is more likely that at least one team—particularly the visitors—will fail to score. Therefore, the preferred market is BTTS - No: this means that at least one team will not score, and does not automatically imply a 0:0 result or that neither team will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

TPS create chances worth an average of 1.79 xG at home and take 15.73 shots per match, while SJK concede an average of 1.64 goals away from home. The hosts have scored at least two goals in total in 91% of their matches, compared with 73% for SJK, which clearly supports the Over 1.5 goals line. SJK have limited attacking potential away from home, averaging 0.82 goals scored and failing to score in as many as 55% of matches, so expectations for the visitors are lower. Nevertheless, TPS have scored 8 goals in their last five matches, while SJK have conceded 6 during the same period, giving the hosts a realistic chance of covering the low line on their own. The projected total of 2.45 goals suggests that Over 1.5 has the strongest support, while the 2.5 line remains considerably more balanced.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a TPS win, as SJK were level at the break in 6 of 11 matches, or 55% of cases. The opening stages point to a low-scoring game: TPS average 0.36 goals before half-time, SJK 0.27, while both teams keep a clean sheet at the break in 45% of matches. After the interval, the hosts’ advantage becomes clear: TPS score an average of 1.09 goals and concede 0.55, whereas SJK score 0.55 and concede as many as 1.09 goals. TPS win the second half in 55% of matches and average 1.91 points in those periods, compared with just 9% of second-half wins and 0.64 points for SJK. In addition, TPS have shown greater consistency, remaining unbeaten in their last 5 matches and conceding only 0.6 goals per game, which further supports the HT/FT turnaround scenario from a draw to a TPS victory.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
TPSSJK
10Shots10
TPSSJK
2Shots on target1
TPSSJK
1.09xG0.98
TPSSJK
5Corners6
TPSSJK
44Dangerous attacks38
TPSSJK
13Fouls23
TPSSJK
2Cards4
TPSSJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match1.14
TPSSJK
1.05Goals conceded / match1.5
TPSSJK
46%Average possession52%
TPSSJK
4.36Shots on target / match4.73
TPSSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.77Shots per match13.36
TPSSJK
4.36Shots on target4.73
TPSSJK
10.8%Shot conversion8.5%
TPSSJK
46%Possession52%
TPSSJK
1.45xG for1.57
TPSSJK
1.65xG against1.45
TPSSJK

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedSJK: Balanced
TPSSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TPS is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - TPS · 1 pts / match - SJK

TPS
WDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W32% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-7
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
SJK
WDLLD
Season result split
18% W32% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-11
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TPS is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - TPS · 1.14 goals / match - SJK

TPS is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.05 goals / match - TPS · 1.5 goals / match - SJK

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

28Goals scored (season)25
TPSSJK
23Goals conceded (season)33
TPSSJK
2.32Average goals in match2.64
TPSSJK
8Goals scored (last 5)6
TPSSJK
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
TPSSJK

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal64%
TPSSJK
32%2 goals32%
TPSSJK
18%3 goals18%
TPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSSJK

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal82%
TPSSJK
27%2 goals55%
TPSSJK
9%3 goals14%
TPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time14%
TPSSJK
5%BTTS in both halves9%
TPSSJK
27%Scored in both halves23%
TPSSJK

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
TPSSJK
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
TPSSJK
60%BTTS - last 540%
TPSSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
TPSSJK
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
TPSSJK
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
TPSSJK

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
TPSSJK
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
TPSSJK
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
TPSSJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TPS is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - TPS · 0.91 pts / match - SJK

TPS - half-time state
23% leading41% draw36% trailing
SJK - half-time state
18% leading36% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)0.91
TPSSJK
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.32
TPSSJK
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
TPSSJK
1.14Average goals (1st half)1
TPSSJK
59%Clean sheet before half-time45%
TPSSJK
59%No goal before half-time68%
TPSSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)1.27
TPSSJK
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
TPSSJK
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
TPSSJK
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.64
TPSSJK
55%Clean sheet after half-time41%
TPSSJK
36%No goal after half-time45%
TPSSJK

TPS - second-half results

32% W50% D18% L
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - second-half results

32% W32% D36% L
20
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

SJK
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
1
4
16-30
4
4
31-45
5
13
46-60
4
1
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaSJK
Average goals in match 2.322.58 2.64
Both teams scored 55%49% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%46% 55%
Clean sheets 32%29% 18%
Goal before half-time 64%73% 73%
Goal after half-time 77%75% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJKYellow cardLeon Vesterbacka
  2. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  3. TPSSubstitutionOn: Miika KauppilaOff: Oscar Häggström
  4. SJKYellow cardKarlson Nwanege
  5. TPSYellow cardMarius Konkkola
  6. SJKYellow cardSalim Giabo Yussif
  7. SJKSubstitutionOn: Aziz CisséOff: Elias Mastokangas

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): TPS 1 - 0 - 1 SJK. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of TPS vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 0:0 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between TPS and SJK?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches TPS won 1, SJK won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs SJK?

TPS score 1.27 goals per game on average and SJK 1.14. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 55% of TPS's matches and 55% of SJK's.

What form are TPS and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and SJK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs SJK?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.